World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Genetics
France
2024
Award Badge
Genetics and Molecular Biology
France
2024

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 88 1175 1110 41 36 379 26764

Didier Lacombe publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Didier Lacombe between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Didier Lacombe published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 14.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 29 publications in 2018. 28 of the 495 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 29. Peak 29 publications in 2018. 1992: 2 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 10 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 18 publications 2006: 17 publications 2007: 19 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 21 publications 2013: 20 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 28 publications 2017: 23 publications 2018: 29 publications 2019: 26 publications 2020: 24 publications 2021: 24 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 11 publications
1992 2025

495 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Didier Lacombe: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 2
1993 8
1994 7
1995 6
1996 10
1997 5
1998 6
1999 9
2000 8
2001 6
2002 9
2003 12
2004 10
2005 18
2006 17
2007 19
2008 13
2009 16
2010 16
2011 17
2012 21
2013 20
2014 17
2015 13
2016 28
2017 23
2018 29
2019 26
2020 24
2021 24
2022 15
2023 13
2024 17
2025 11
Total 495
Download as CSV

Didier Lacombe publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Didier Lacombe sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 375–384 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 379 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46 379
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Didier Lacombe D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Didier Lacombe sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88–89 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102 88
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2024 - Research.com Genetics in France Leader Award
  • 2024 - Research.com Genetics and Molecular Biology in France Leader Award

Overview

Didier Lacombe is a researcher affiliated with the University of Bordeaux in France. Their work spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with 159 publications in these areas. Additionally, Lacombe has contributed to medicine, with 75 publications related to this field.

Their subfield expertise includes molecular biology and genetics, each with 68 publications, followed by physiology with 17 publications, surgery with 11, and cell biology with 9. Lacombe's main research topics concentrate on genetics and neurodevelopmental disorders, genomics and rare diseases, and lysosomal storage disorders research, alongside studies in genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities, mitochondrial function and pathology, congenital limb and hand anomalies, and epigenetics and DNA methylation.

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Lacombe include:

  • Evaluation of DNA Methylation Episignatures for Diagnosis and Phenotype Correlations in 42 Mendelian Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 2020, The American Journal of Human Genetics
  • Challenging the traditional approach for interpreting genetic variants: Lessons from Fabry disease, 2021, Clinical Genetics
  • Rubinstein-Taybi Syndrome: A Model of Epigenetic Disorder, 2021, Genes
  • BLOC1S5 pathogenic variants cause a new type of Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome, 2020, Genetics in Medicine
  • Phenotypic spectrum and genomics of undiagnosed arthrogryposis multiplex congenita, 2021, Journal of Medical Genetics

Lacombe frequently publishes in specific scientific journals, with the most publications in the following venues:

  • Clinical Genetics (9 publications)
  • European Journal of Human Genetics (8 publications)
  • Journal of Medical Genetics (7 publications)
  • European Journal of Medical Genetics (4 publications)
  • Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases (4 publications)

Their collaborative network includes co-authors such as Julien Van-Gils, Laurence Faivre, David Geneviève, Aurélien Trimouille, and Patricia Fergelot, with collaboration counts ranging from 13 to 21 publications per co-author.

Best Publications

  • LDL Receptor-Related Protein 5 (LRP5) Affects Bone Accrual and Eye Development

    Y. Q. Gong;R. B. Slee;N. Fukai;G. Rawadi

  • Mutation Spectrum and Genotype-Phenotype Analyses in Cowden Disease and Bannayan-Zonana Syndrome, Two Hamartoma Syndromes With Germline PTEN Mutation

    Debbie J. Marsh;Valérie Coulon;Kathryn L. Lunetta;Philippe Rocca-Serra

  • Mutations in genes encoding ribonuclease H2 subunits cause Aicardi-Goutières syndrome and mimic congenital viral brain infection.

    Yanick J Crow;Yanick J Crow;Andrea Leitch;Bruce E Hayward;Anna Garner

  • A human homologue of the Drosophila eyes absent gene underlies Branchio-Oto-Renal (BOR) syndrome and identifies a novel gene family

    Abdelhak S;Kalatzis;Heilig R;Compain S

  • Mutations in TUBG1 , DYNC1H1 , KIF5C and KIF2A cause malformations of cortical development and microcephaly

    Karine Poirier;Nicolas Lebrun;Nicolas Lebrun;Loic Broix;Loic Broix;Guoling Tian

  • Clinical and Molecular Phenotype of Aicardi-Goutières Syndrome

    Gillian Rice;Teresa Patrick;Rekha Parmar;Claire F Taylor

  • Mutations in LRP2 , which encodes the multiligand receptor megalin, cause Donnai-Barrow and facio-oculo-acoustico-renal syndromes

    Sibel Kantarci;Lihadh Al-Gazali;R Sean Hill;R Sean Hill;Dian Donnai

  • BBS10 encodes a vertebrate-specific chaperonin-like protein and is a major BBS locus.

    Corinne Stoetzel;Virginie Laurier;Erica E. Davis;Jean Muller

  • Comparison of Clinical Presentations and Outcomes Between Patients With TGFBR2 and FBN1 Mutations in Marfan Syndrome and Related Disorders

    David Attias;Chantal Stheneur;Carine Roy;Gwenaëlle Collod-Béroud

  • Cardio-facio-cutaneous and Noonan syndromes due to mutations in the RAS/MAPK signalling pathway: genotype–phenotype relationships and overlap with Costello syndrome

    Caroline Nava;Nadine Hanna;Caroline Michot;Sabrina Pereira

  • SLC26A4 gene is frequently involved in nonsyndromic hearing impairment with enlarged vestibular aqueduct in Caucasian populations

    Sébastien Albert;Hélène Blons;Laurence Jonard;Delphine Feldmann

  • Efficient strategy for the molecular diagnosis of intellectual disability using targeted high-throughput sequencing

    Claire Redin;Bénédicte Gérard;Julia Lauer;Yvan Herenger

  • Defining the Effect of the 16p11.2 Duplication on Cognition, Behavior, and Medical Comorbidities.

    Debra D'Angelo;Sébastien Lebon;Qixuan Chen;Sandra Martin-Brevet

  • NF1 microdeletions in neurofibromatosis type 1: from genotype to phenotype†

    Eric Pasmant;Audrey Sabbagh;Gillian Spurlock;Ingrid Laurendeau

  • Heterozygous endothelin receptor B (EDNRB) mutations in isolated Hirschsprung disease

    Jeanne Amiel;Tania Attié;Dominique Jan;Anna Pelet

  • Five new TTF1/NKX2.1 mutations in brain–lung–thyroid syndrome: rescue by PAX8 synergism in one case

    Aurore Carré;Gabor Szinnai;Mireille Castanet;Mireille Castanet;Sylvia Sura-Trueba

  • Mutations in PHF8 are associated with X linked mental retardation and cleft lip/cleft palate

    F. Laumonnier;S. Holbert;N. Ronce;F. Faravelli

  • Genotype-phenotype correlation in Costello syndrome: HRAS mutation analysis in 43 cases

    B. Kerr;M. A. Delrue;S. Sigaudy;R. Perveen

  • NF1 microdeletions in neurofibromatosis type 1: from genotype to phenotype. Hum Mutat 31:E1506-E1518

    Eric Pasmant;Audrey Sabbagh;Gill Spurlock;Ingrid Laurendeau

Frequent Co-Authors

Benoit Arveiler
Benoit Arveiler University of Bordeaux
Laurence Faivre
Laurence Faivre University of Burgundy
Alain Verloes
Alain Verloes Université Paris Cité
Annick Toutain
Annick Toutain François Rabelais University
Stanislas Lyonnet
Stanislas Lyonnet Université Paris Cité
Valérie Cormier-Daire
Valérie Cormier-Daire Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital
Albert David
Albert David University of Nantes
Sylvie Odent
Sylvie Odent University of Rennes
Delphine Héron
Delphine Héron Sorbonne University
Tania Attié-Bitach
Tania Attié-Bitach Université Paris Cité

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a future in Genetics, there are several flexible study options and career pathways available online. Many students begin with foundational courses in biology before advancing to specialized Genetics degrees. There are financial aid for medical billing and coding programs, making it easier for aspiring healthcare professionals to start their journey affordably and transition into related healthcare fields.

Those interested in accelerating their academic timeline can explore fast track college degree programs. These enable students to complete coursework and earn credentials more quickly, opening doors to internships and research opportunities in less time.

For learners who need more scheduling flexibility, self paced online colleges are ideal. You can progress at your own speed, which is especially helpful if you’re balancing work or family obligations alongside your studies.

Starting your application process is now easier and more cost-effective, with schools like majuba college online application offering zero application fees. This removes financial barriers for students eager to pursue online genetics and healthcare-related programs.

Best Scientists Citing Didier Lacombe

Trending Scientists