World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 70 2248 2135 34 31 283 22899

Wim Van Hul publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Wim Van Hul between 1987 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Wim Van Hul published across 40 years, from 1987 to 2026, averaging 22.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 535 publications in 2009. 5 of the 889 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 535. Peak 535 publications in 2009. 1987: 3 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 4 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 4 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 15 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 18 publications 2009: 535 publications 2010: 31 publications 2011: 26 publications 2012: 18 publications 2013: 25 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 4 publications 2026: 1 publication
1987 2026

889 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Wim Van Hul: publications per year, 1987 to 2026
Year Publications
1987 3
1988 1
1989 1
1990 4
1991 3
1992 4
1993 2
1994 1
1995 1
1996 4
1997 6
1998 5
1999 10
2000 12
2001 15
2002 8
2003 11
2004 8
2005 15
2006 8
2007 15
2008 18
2009 535
2010 31
2011 26
2012 18
2013 25
2014 5
2015 9
2016 15
2017 5
2018 8
2019 8
2020 15
2021 9
2022 11
2023 4
2024 5
2025 4
2026 1
Total 889
Download as CSV

Wim Van Hul publications per year - data summary

  • Wim Van Hul, a Genetics scholar from University of Antwerp, has 889 publications recorded across 40 years, from 1987 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1987 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2009, with 535 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1988, 1989, 1994, 1995 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • The rate of publication averages 22.2 papers per year over the whole span, or 22.2 per year counting only the 40 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 25 publications, 3% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1987-2000: 57 publications (4.1 per year); 2001-2014: 738 publications (52.7 per year); 2015-2026: 94 publications (7.8 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Wim Van Hul publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wim Van Hul sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 275–284 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 283 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87 283
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Wim Van Hul publication distribution in Genetics in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 4,342 Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 67 ranges running from 45–54 to 703+ publications.
  • Wim Van Hul, a Genetics scholar from University of Antwerp, records 283 publications - the 73rd percentile of the discipline.
  • 73% of ranked Genetics scientists score the same or lower than Wim Van Hul, and about 27% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 195–204 publications range, and Wim Van Hul ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 125–134 publications, holding 217 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 56% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 205–214 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 703 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (2% of the field).

Wim Van Hul D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wim Van Hul sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 70–71 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158 70
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Wim Van Hul D-index placement in Genetics in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 4,342 Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 61 ranges running from 40–41 to 160+ D-Index.
  • Wim Van Hul, a Genetics scholar from University of Antwerp, records 70 D-Index - the 49th percentile of the discipline.
  • 49% of ranked Genetics scientists score the same or lower than Wim Van Hul, and about 51% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 70–71 D-Index range, and Wim Van Hul falls inside that same range.
  • The most crowded range is 62–63 D-Index, holding 191 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 51% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 70–71 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more, 96 scientists in all (2% of the field).

Overview

Wim Van Hul is affiliated with the University of Antwerp in Belgium. Their research primarily spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Medicine, with a particular focus on Genetics and Molecular Biology as key subfields. Additional areas of study include Oncology, Cell Biology, and Rheumatology.

The main topics of Van Hul's work include:

  • Bone health and treatments
  • Connective tissue disorders research
  • Bone Metabolism and Diseases
  • Dermatological and Skeletal Disorders
  • Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer
  • Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation

Van Hul has published extensively in several scientific venues. The most frequent publication forums are:

  • Frontiers in Endocrinology
  • Bone Reports
  • Calcified Tissue International
  • Bone
  • Genes

Among recent papers, notable titles include:

  • WNT Signaling and Bone: Lessons From Skeletal Dysplasias and Disorders, 2020, Frontiers in Endocrinology
  • Germline and Mosaic Variants in PRKACA and PRKACB Cause a Multiple Congenital Malformation Syndrome, 2020, The American Journal of Human Genetics
  • Insights into the multifactorial causation of obesity by integrated genetic and epigenetic analysis, 2020, Obesity Reviews
  • A Roadmap to Gene Discoveries and Novel Therapies in Monogenic Low and High Bone Mass Disorders, 2021, Frontiers in Endocrinology
  • Perspective of the GEMSTONE Consortium on Current and Future Approaches to Functional Validation for Skeletal Genetic Disease Using Cellular, Molecular and Animal-Modeling Techniques, 2021, Frontiers in Endocrinology

Van Hul collaborates frequently with a group of coauthors including:

  • Geert Mortier
  • Eveline Boudin
  • Yentl Huybrechts
  • Gretl Hendrickx
  • Ellen Steenackers

The researcher's work covers a range of genetic and molecular mechanisms underlying bone and connective tissue disorders, with an integrative approach that blends genetic discoveries with epigenetic and cellular analysis. This multidisciplinary expertise supports advances in understanding skeletal diseases and exploring potential therapeutic approaches.

Best Publications

  • Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies 56 bone mineral density loci and reveals 14 loci associated with risk of fracture

    Karol Estrada;Unnur Styrkarsdottir;Evangelos Evangelou;Yi-Hsiang Hsu

  • Presenile dementia and cerebral haemorrhage linked to a mutation at codon 692 of the β–amyloid precursor protein gene

    Lydia Hendriks;Cornelia M. van Duijn;Patrick Cras;Marc Cruts

  • TGF-Β1-induced migration of bone mesenchymal stem cells couples bone resorption with formation

    Yi Tang;Xiangwei Wu;Xiangwei Wu;Xiangwei Wu;Weiqi Lei;Lijuan Pang;Lijuan Pang

  • Transforming Growth Factor-β1 to the Bone

    Katrien Janssens;Peter ten Dijke;Sophie Janssens;Wim Van Hul

  • Extracellular regulation of BMP signaling in vertebrates: a cocktail of modulators.

    Wendy Balemans;Wim Van Hul

  • Dysfunction of lipid sensor GPR120 leads to obesity in both mouse and human

    Atsuhiko Ichimura;Akira Hirasawa;Odile Poulain-Godefroy;Odile Poulain-Godefroy;Amélie Bonnefond;Amélie Bonnefond

  • Six Novel Missense Mutations in the LDL Receptor-Related Protein 5 (LRP5) Gene in Different Conditions with an Increased Bone Density

    Liesbeth Van Wesenbeeck;Erna Cleiren;Jeppe Gram;Rodney K. Beals

  • Loss-of-function mutations in LEMD3 result in osteopoikilosis, Buschke-Ollendorff syndrome and melorheostosis.

    Jan Hellemans;Olena Preobrazhenska;Andy Willaert;Philippe Debeer

  • Albers-Schönberg disease (autosomal dominant osteopetrosis, type II) results from mutations in the ClCN7 chloride channel gene

    Erna Cleiren;Olivier Bénichou;Els Van Hul;Jeppe Gram

  • Domain-specific mutations in sequestosome 1 (SQSTM1) cause familial and sporadic Paget's disease

    Lynne J. Hocking;Gavin J.A. Lucas;Anna Daroszewska;Jon Mangion

  • Mutations in the CCN gene family member WISP3 cause progressive pseudorheumatoid dysplasia.

    J R Hurvitz;W M Suwairi;W Van Hul;H El-Shanti

  • PPARα gene expression correlates with severity and histological treatment response in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis

    Sven Francque;An Verrijken;Sandrine Caron;Janne Prawitt

  • Large-Scale Analysis of Association Between LRP5 and LRP6 Variants and Osteoporosis

    Joyce B J. van Meurs;Thomas A. Trikalinos;Thomas A. Trikalinos;Stuart H. Ralston;Susana Balcells

  • Bone Overgrowth-associated Mutations in the LRP4 Gene Impair Sclerostin Facilitator Function

    Olivier Leupin;Elke Piters;Christine Halleux;Shouih Hu

  • Reduced affinity to and inhibition by DKK1 form a common mechanism by which high bone mass-associated missense mutations in LRP5 affect canonical Wnt signaling.

    Minrong Ai;Sheri L. Holmen;Wim Van Hul;Bart O. Williams

  • A look behind the scenes: the risk and pathogenesis of primary osteoporosis

    Gretl Hendrickx;Eveline Boudin;Wim Van Hul

  • Molecular basis of multiple exostoses: mutations in the EXT1 and EXT2 genes.

    Wim Wuyts;Wim Van Hul

  • LRP5 and Wnt signaling: a union made for bone.

    Mark L Johnson;Kimberley Harnish;Roel Nusse;Wim Van Hul

  • EXT-mutation analysis and loss of heterozygosity in sporadic and hereditary osteochondromas and secondary chondrosarcomas.

    Judith V.M.G. Bovée;Anne-Marie Cleton-Jansen;Wim Wuyts;Goedele Caethoven

  • Involvement of PLEKHM1 in osteoclastic vesicular transport and osteopetrosis in incisors absent rats and humans

    Liesbeth Van Wesenbeeck;Paul R. Odgren;Fraser Coxon;Annalisa Frattini

Frequent Co-Authors

Luc Van Gaal
Luc Van Gaal University of Antwerp
Geert Mortier
Geert Mortier University of Antwerp
Wim Wuyts
Wim Wuyts University of Antwerp
Stuart H. Ralston
Stuart H. Ralston University of Edinburgh
Kim Brixen
Kim Brixen University of Southern Denmark
Jean-Pierre Devogelaer
Jean-Pierre Devogelaer Université Catholique de Louvain
Jens Bollerslev
Jens Bollerslev Oslo University Hospital
Erik Fransen
Erik Fransen University of Antwerp
Philippe Froguel
Philippe Froguel Imperial College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Genetics in the USA opens doors to a range of healthcare careers that increasingly value flexibility and advanced skills. Many students look for rn to bsn programs with no clinicals, which allow working nurses to advance their education online while balancing work and family commitments. Such programs can provide strong foundational knowledge for transitioning into genetics-based nursing roles.

If you’re interested in taking your education further, pursuing the fastest bsn to dnp program can equip you with leadership and research skills critical in genetics and genomics. For those looking for a quicker entry into healthcare, options like an accelerated ma program can fast-track your pathway to becoming a medical assistant with a focus on genetic testing or laboratory work.

Many students also seek out the easiest online dnp programs to balance advanced study with work and life responsibilities. All of these online degree options support evolving career pathways in genetics, allowing you to customize your education and professional journey.

Best Scientists Citing Wim Van Hul

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles