World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
78
Citations
17701
World Ranking
18196
National Ranking
201

Kim Brixen publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kim Brixen sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 406 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Kim Brixen D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kim Brixen sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kim Brixen is affiliated with the University of Southern Denmark in Denmark. Their research primarily focuses on the intersection of economics, econometrics, and finance, with specific expertise in economics and econometrics.

Their contributions extend into several subfields, including biomedical engineering, public health, environmental and occupational health, management information systems, and general health professions. These interdisciplinary interests support comprehensive approaches to topics such as health systems, economic evaluations, and quality of life.

Key topics in Kim Brixen's body of work include:

  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Biomedical and Engineering Education
  • Health and Medical Research Impacts
  • Quality and Supply Management
  • Healthcare Cost, Quality, Practices

Kim Brixen has published in venues such as BMJ Open, which hosts multiple papers coauthored by them. Their recent publications involve the application of Lean Management methods to research processes. These include:

  • How to increase value and reduce waste in research: initial experiences of applying Lean thinking and visual management in research leadership (2022), published in BMJ Open
  • The use and application of Lean Management methods to research processes-a scoping review protocol (2024), published in BMJ Open

Their work often involves collaboration with other researchers, including frequent coauthors such as Kirsten Ohm Kyvik, Malene Grubbe Hildebrandt, Kristian Kidholm, Jørgen Ejler Pedersen, and Mohammad Naghavi-Behzad. These collaborations reflect cross-disciplinary efforts in management and health research contexts.

Best Publications

  • Fracture Risk and Zoledronic Acid Therapy in Men with Osteoporosis

    Steven Boonen;Jean-Yves Reginster;Jean-Marc Kaufman;Kurt Lippuner

  • Patient level pooled analysis of 68 500 patients from seven major vitamin D fracture trials in US and Europe

    B Abrahamsen;T Masud;A Avenell;F Anderson

  • Effects of long‐term strontium ranelate treatment on the risk of nonvertebral and vertebral fractures in postmenopausal osteoporosis: Results of a five‐year, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial

    Jean Yves Reginster;Dieter Felsenberg;Steven Boonen;Adolfo Diez-Perez

  • Strontium ranelate reduces the risk of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in women eighty years of age and older.

    Ego Seeman;Bruno Vellas;Claude Benhamou;Jean Pierre Aquino

  • Hip fracture patients at risk of second hip fracture: a nationwide population-based cohort study of 169,145 cases during 1977-2001.

    Jesper Ryg;Jesper Ryg;Lars Rejnmark;Soren Overgaard;Soren Overgaard;Kim Brixen;Kim Brixen

  • Large-Scale Analysis of Association Between LRP5 and LRP6 Variants and Osteoporosis

    Joyce B J. van Meurs;Thomas A. Trikalinos;Thomas A. Trikalinos;Stuart H. Ralston;Susana Balcells

  • Incidence and prevalence of nutritional and hereditary rickets in southern Denmark

    Signe Sparre Beck-Nielsen;Bendt Brock-Jacobsen;Jeppe Gram;Kim Brixen

  • Vitamin D with calcium reduces mortality: patient level pooled analysis of 70,528 patients from eight major vitamin D trials.

    Lars Rejnmark;Alison Avenell;Tahir Masud;Tahir Masud;Frazer Anderson

  • Fractures in patients with anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and other eating disorders—A nationwide register study

    Peter Vestergaard;Charlotte Emborg;René K. Støving;Claus Hagen

  • Suppression of endogenous testosterone production attenuates the response to strength training: a randomized, placebo-controlled, and blinded intervention study.

    Thue Kvorning;Marianne Andersen;Kim Brixen;Klavs Madsen

  • Sequential treatment of severe postmenopausal osteoporosis after teriparatide: final results of the randomized, controlled European Study of Forsteo (EUROFORS).

    Richard Eastell;Thomas Nickelsen;Fernando Marin;Clare Barker

  • Risk assessment tools to identify women with increased risk of osteoporotic fracture. Complexity or simplicity? A systematic review

    Katrine Hass Rubin;Teresa Friis-Holmberg;Anne Pernille Hermann;Bo Abrahamsen

  • Discriminative power of three indices of renal calcium excretion for the distinction between familial hypocalciuric hypercalcaemia and primary hyperparathyroidism: a follow-up study on methods.

    Signe Engkjaer Christensen;Peter H Nissen;Peter Vestergaard;Lene Heickendorff

  • A short course of recombinant human growth hormone treatment stimulates osteoblasts and activates bone remodeling in normal human volunteers.

    Kim Brixen;Henning K. Nielsen;Leif Mosekilde;Allan Flyvbjerg

  • Relationship Between Bone Mineral Density Changes and Fracture Risk Reduction in Patients Treated With Strontium Ranelate

    Olivier Bruyere;Christian Roux;Johann Detilleux;Daniel O. Slosman

  • Differing effects of PTH 1–34, PTH 1–84, and zoledronic acid on bone microarchitecture and estimated strength in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: An 18-month open-labeled observational study using HR-pQCT

    Stinus Hansen;Stinus Hansen;Ellen Margrethe Hauge;Jens-Erik Beck Jensen;Kim Brixen;Kim Brixen

  • Polymorphisms in the vitamin D receptor gene and bone mass, bone turnover and osteoporotic fractures.

    B L Langdahl;C H Gravholt;K Brixen;E F Eriksen

  • Compromised cortical bone compartment in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with microvascular disease

    Vikram Vinod Shanbhogue;Stinus Hansen;Morten Frost;Niklas Rye Jorgensen

  • Bone Geometry, Volumetric Density, Microarchitecture, and Estimated Bone Strength Assessed by HR-pQCT in Adult Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

    Vikram Vinod Shanbhogue;Vikram Vinod Shanbhogue;Stinus Jørn Hansen;Stinus Jørn Hansen;Morten Frost;Morten Frost;Niklas Rye Jørgensen

  • Suppression of endogenous testosterone production attenuates the response to strength training

    Thue Kvorning;Marianne Andersen;Kim Brixen;Klavs Madsen

Frequent Co-Authors

Leif Mosekilde
Leif Mosekilde Aarhus University Hospital
Peter Vestergaard
Peter Vestergaard Aalborg University
Jean-Yves Reginster
Jean-Yves Reginster University of Liège
Lars Rejnmark
Lars Rejnmark Aarhus University
Moustapha Kassem
Moustapha Kassem University of Southern Denmark
Erik Fink Eriksen
Erik Fink Eriksen University of Oslo
Ulla Feldt-Rasmussen
Ulla Feldt-Rasmussen University of Copenhagen
Steven Boonen
Steven Boonen KU Leuven
Allan Flyvbjerg
Allan Flyvbjerg Steno Diabetes Center
Wim Van Hul
Wim Van Hul University of Antwerp

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in healthcare careers but not ready to commit to medical school, there are flexible online alternatives. For instance, an him associate degree online can open doors to managing patient data and working with cutting-edge health information systems.

Another in-demand field is medical billing and coding. Interested individuals should consider the average cost of medical billing and coding program before enrolling, as affordability and accreditation vary widely across institutions.

Nursing remains an excellent career path for those seeking to combine patient care with professional advancement. Many students are now seeking the cheapest fnp programs to become family nurse practitioners efficiently and economically.

Additionally, the rise of online nursing school options makes it easier than ever to earn a nursing degree while balancing work and personal responsibilities. These diverse online pathways can help you launch or advance your career in health care, all while allowing flexibility and cost savings.

Best Scientists Citing Kim Brixen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles