World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Medicine
New Zealand
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 139 1767 1641 7 5 700 69506

Ian R. Reid publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ian R. Reid between 1984 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ian R. Reid published across 43 years, from 1984 to 2026, averaging 17.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 45 publications in 2013. 13 of the 743 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 45. Peak 45 publications in 2013. 1984: 2 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 7 publications 1987: 8 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 10 publications 1990: 12 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 13 publications 1993: 10 publications 1994: 11 publications 1995: 12 publications 1996: 18 publications 1997: 17 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 11 publications 2000: 18 publications 2001: 15 publications 2002: 17 publications 2003: 16 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 21 publications 2006: 24 publications 2007: 26 publications 2008: 32 publications 2009: 34 publications 2010: 35 publications 2011: 35 publications 2012: 38 publications 2013: 45 publications 2014: 37 publications 2015: 30 publications 2016: 19 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 20 publications 2020: 20 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 18 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 11 publications 2026: 2 publications
1984 2026

743 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ian R. Reid: publications per year, 1984 to 2026
Year Publications
1984 2
1985 3
1986 7
1987 8
1988 4
1989 10
1990 12
1991 5
1992 13
1993 10
1994 11
1995 12
1996 18
1997 17
1998 8
1999 11
2000 18
2001 15
2002 17
2003 16
2004 13
2005 21
2006 24
2007 26
2008 32
2009 34
2010 35
2011 35
2012 38
2013 45
2014 37
2015 30
2016 19
2017 18
2018 10
2019 20
2020 20
2021 19
2022 18
2023 11
2024 8
2025 11
2026 2
Total 743
Download as CSV

Ian R. Reid publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian R. Reid sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 681–700 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 700 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336 700
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Ian R. Reid D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian R. Reid sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 138–139 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 139 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134 139
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Medicine in New Zealand Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Medicine in New Zealand Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in New Zealand Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Medicine in New Zealand Leader Award
  • 1997 - Fellow of the Royal Society of New Zealand

Overview

Ian R. Reid is affiliated with the University of Auckland in New Zealand and conducts research primarily in the field of medicine. Their work focuses extensively on bone health and osteoporosis, covering clinical and molecular aspects related to bone metabolism and diseases.

The scientist's research spans several main topics including:

  • Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Bone health and treatments
  • Vitamin D research studies
  • Bone metabolism and diseases
  • Bone and joint diseases
  • Hip and femur fractures
  • Vitamin C and antioxidants research

Ian R. Reid has contributed to multiple subfields of study such as orthopedics and sports medicine, oncology, pathology and forensic medicine, molecular biology, and surgery. These subfields reflect the multidisciplinary nature of their work in understanding and addressing bone-related conditions.

Frequent publication venues for their research include:

  • Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
  • The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
  • Osteoporosis International
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Key recent papers authored by Ian R. Reid are:

  • A broader strategy for osteoporosis interventions, 2020, Nature Reviews Endocrinology
  • Calcium and/or Vitamin D Supplementation for the Prevention of Fragility Fractures: Who Needs It?, 2020, Nutrients
  • Zoledronate, 2020, Bone

Other significant publications related to their research area, authored by collaborators, include:

  • Efficacy and Safety of Romosozumab Among Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis and Mild-to-Moderate Chronic Kidney Disease, 2020, Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
  • Development of the Asia Pacific Consortium on Osteoporosis (APCO) Framework: clinical standards of care for the screening, diagnosis, and management of osteoporosis in the Asia-Pacific region, 2021, Osteoporosis International

Ian R. Reid has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Anne Horne
  • Borislav Mihov
  • Mark J Bolland
  • Gregory D. Gamble
  • Greg Gamble

The scientist holds the distinction of being a Fellow of the Royal Society of New Zealand since 1997, reflecting recognition within the national scientific community.

Best Publications

  • Once-yearly zoledronic acid for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis

    Dennis M. Black;Pierre D. Delmas;Richard Eastell;Ian R. Reid

  • Denosumab for Prevention of Fractures in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis

    Steven R. Cummings;Javier San Martin;Michael R. Mcclung;Ethel S. Siris

  • Effect of calcium supplements on risk of myocardial infarction and cardiovascular events: meta-analysis

    Mark J Bolland;Alison Avenell;John A Baron;Andrew Grey

  • Diagnosis and Management of Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: A Systematic Review and International Consensus

    Aliya A Khan;Archie Morrison;David A Hanley;Dieter Felsenberg

  • Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies 56 bone mineral density loci and reveals 14 loci associated with risk of fracture

    Karol Estrada;Unnur Styrkarsdottir;Evangelos Evangelou;Yi-Hsiang Hsu

  • Calcium supplements with or without vitamin D and risk of cardiovascular events: reanalysis of the Women’s Health Initiative limited access dataset and meta-analysis

    Mark J Bolland;Andrew Grey;Alison Avenell;Greg D Gamble

  • Interim Report and Recommendations of the World Health Organization Task-Force for Osteoporosis

    H K Genant;C Cooper;G Poor;I Reid

  • Intravenous zoledronic acid in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density.

    Ian R. Reid;Jacques P. Brown;Peter Burckhardt;Zebulun Horowitz

  • Vascular events in healthy older women receiving calcium supplementation: randomised controlled trial

    Mark J Bolland;P Alan Barber;Robert N Doughty;Barbara Mason

  • Relationships among body mass, its components, and bone.

    Reid Ir

  • The Effect of 3 Versus 6 Years of Zoledronic Acid Treatment of Osteoporosis: A Randomized Extension to the HORIZON-Pivotal Fracture Trial (PFT)

    Dennis M Black;Ian R Reid;Steven Boonen;Christina Bucci-Rechtweg

  • Effects of vitamin D supplements on bone mineral density: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Ian R Reid;Mark J Bolland;Andrew Grey

  • Determinants of total body and regional bone mineral density in normal postmenopausal women--a key role for fat mass.

    I. R. Reid;R. Ames;M. C. Evans;S. Sharpe

  • Effect of calcium supplementation on bone loss in postmenopausal women

    Ian R. Reid;Ruth W. Ames;Margaret C. Evans;Gregory D. Gamble

  • Relationships between fat and bone.

    I. R. Reid

  • Long-Term Effects of Calcium Supplementation on Bone Loss and Fractures in Postmenopausal Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Ian R. Reid;Ruth W. Ames;Margaret C. Evans;Gregory D. Gamble

  • Leptin directly regulates bone cell function in vitro and reduces bone fragility in vivo

    J Cornish;KE Callon;U Bava;C Lin

  • The Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-γ Agonist Rosiglitazone Decreases Bone Formation and Bone Mineral Density in Healthy Postmenopausal Women: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

    Andrew Grey;Mark Bolland;Greg Gamble;Diana Wattie

  • Fat mass is an important determinant of whole body bone density in premenopausal women but not in men.

    Ian R. Reid;Lindsay D. Plank;Margaret C. Evans

  • The effect of vitamin D supplementation on skeletal, vascular, or cancer outcomes: a trial sequential meta-analysis.

    Mark J Bolland;Andrew Grey;Greg D Gamble;Ian R Reid

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew Grey
Andrew Grey University of Auckland
Greg D. Gamble
Greg D. Gamble University of Auckland
Richard Eastell
Richard Eastell University of Sheffield
Steven Boonen
Steven Boonen KU Leuven
Dennis M. Black
Dennis M. Black University of California, San Francisco
John A. Eisman
John A. Eisman Garvan Institute of Medical Research
Steven R. Cummings
Steven R. Cummings University of California, San Francisco
Felicia Cosman
Felicia Cosman Columbia University
Jacques P. Brown
Jacques P. Brown Université Laval
Garth J. S. Cooper
Garth J. S. Cooper University of Auckland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative healthcare degrees online can offer flexibility and affordability, especially for students seeking to advance or change their careers while balancing work or family responsibilities. Online nursing programs are increasingly popular, catering to a wide range of backgrounds and goals.

For those looking to become advanced practice nurses, finding the cheapest dnp online program is key to minimizing long-term educational debt. Registered nurses interested in expanding their qualifications may consider the cheapest bsn programs for a cost-effective pathway to earning a Bachelor of Science in Nursing.

If you have a non-nursing bachelor’s degree, direct msn programs online allow for a quicker transition into a nursing career without repeating a four-year undergraduate program. Additionally, some students may benefit from researching nursing programs with high acceptance rates, which can improve your chances of beginning your medical or healthcare journey soon.

Best Scientists Citing Ian R. Reid

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles