World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
80
Citations
24976
World Ranking
17050
National Ranking
36

Andrew Grey publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew Grey sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 367 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Andrew Grey D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew Grey sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andrew Grey is affiliated with the University of Auckland in New Zealand and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a focus on various subfields including statistics, probability and uncertainty, public health, environmental and occupational health, orthopedics and sports medicine, safety research, and pathology and forensic medicine.

Their research topics cover a breadth of areas with notable emphasis on meta-analysis and systematic reviews, academic integrity and plagiarism, bone health and osteoporosis research, vitamin D research studies, ethics in clinical research, bone health treatments, and health systems, economic evaluations, and quality of life.

Andrew Grey has authored several recent papers including:

  • Check for publication integrity before misconduct, 2020, Nature
  • Ten Years of Very Infrequent Zoledronate Therapy in Older Women: An Open-Label Extension of a Randomized Trial, 2020, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Frequent co-authors of Andrew Grey include:

  • Mark J Bolland
  • Alison Avenell
  • Greg Gamble
  • Ian R. Reid
  • Anne Horne

Andrew Grey commonly publishes in several scholarly venues, including:

  • Accountability in Research
  • Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
  • Clinical Endocrinology
  • Nature
  • BMJ Open

Best Publications

  • Effect of calcium supplements on risk of myocardial infarction and cardiovascular events: meta-analysis

    Mark J Bolland;Alison Avenell;John A Baron;Andrew Grey

  • Calcium supplements with or without vitamin D and risk of cardiovascular events: reanalysis of the Women’s Health Initiative limited access dataset and meta-analysis

    Mark J Bolland;Andrew Grey;Alison Avenell;Greg D Gamble

  • Vascular events in healthy older women receiving calcium supplementation: randomised controlled trial

    Mark J Bolland;P Alan Barber;Robert N Doughty;Barbara Mason

  • Effects of vitamin D supplements on bone mineral density: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Ian R Reid;Mark J Bolland;Andrew Grey

  • Leptin directly regulates bone cell function in vitro and reduces bone fragility in vivo

    J Cornish;KE Callon;U Bava;C Lin

  • The Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-γ Agonist Rosiglitazone Decreases Bone Formation and Bone Mineral Density in Healthy Postmenopausal Women: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

    Andrew Grey;Mark Bolland;Greg Gamble;Diana Wattie

  • The effect of vitamin D supplementation on skeletal, vascular, or cancer outcomes: a trial sequential meta-analysis.

    Mark J Bolland;Andrew Grey;Greg D Gamble;Ian R Reid

  • Is bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaw caused by soft tissue toxicity?

    Ian R. Reid;Mark J. Bolland;Andrew B. Grey

  • Calcium intake and bone mineral density: systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Vicky Tai;William Leung;Andrew Grey;Ian R Reid

  • Effects of vitamin D supplementation on musculoskeletal health: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis.

    Mark J Bolland;Andrew Grey;Alison Avenell

  • Calcium intake and risk of fracture: systematic review

    Mark J Bolland;William Leung;Vicky Tai;Sonja Bastin

  • Effect of Osteoporosis Treatment on Mortality: A Meta-Analysis

    Mark J. Bolland;Andrew B. Grey;Greg D. Gamble;Ian R. Reid

  • Lactoferrin Is a Potent Regulator of Bone Cell Activity and Increases Bone Formation in Vivo

    Jillian Cornish;Karen E. Callon;Dorit Naot;Kate P. Palmano

  • Calcium and vitamin D supplements and health outcomes: a reanalysis of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) limited-access data set

    Mark J Bolland;Andrew Grey;Greg D Gamble;Ian R Reid

  • Cardiovascular disease and vitamin D supplementation: trial analysis, systematic review, and meta-analysis

    John A Ford;Graeme S MacLennan;Alison Avenell;Mark Bolland

  • The Antiresorptive Effects of a Single Dose of Zoledronate Persist for Two Years: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial in Osteopenic Postmenopausal Women

    Andrew Grey;Mark J. Bolland;Diana Wattie;Anne Horne

  • Vitamin D repletion in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism and coexistent vitamin D insufficiency.

    Andrew Grey;Jenny Lucas;Anne Horne;Greg Gamble

  • Prolonged antiresorptive activity of zoledronate: a randomized, controlled trial.

    Andrew Grey;Mark Bolland;Diana Wattie;Anne Horne

  • The effects of seasonal variation of 25-hydroxyvitamin D and fat mass on a diagnosis of vitamin D sufficiency

    Mark J Bolland;Andrew B Grey;Ruth W Ames;Barbara H Mason

  • A pooled analysis of Vitamin D dose requirements for fracture prevention

    Bo Abrahamsen;Alison Avenell;Mark Bolland;Lars Rejnmark

Frequent Co-Authors

Ian R. Reid
Ian R. Reid University of Auckland
Greg D. Gamble
Greg D. Gamble University of Auckland
Keith J. Petrie
Keith J. Petrie University of Auckland
Mark G. Thomas
Mark G. Thomas University College London
Nicola Dalbeth
Nicola Dalbeth University of Auckland
John A. Baron
John A. Baron University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Garth J. S. Cooper
Garth J. S. Cooper University of Auckland
Peter R. Shepherd
Peter R. Shepherd University of Auckland
Piera Valenti
Piera Valenti Sapienza University of Rome
Peter R. Ebeling
Peter R. Ebeling Monash University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering studying Medicine in the USA, there are many alternative online degrees and career pathways to explore. Online programs can offer flexibility and specialized training for those looking to expand their healthcare credentials.

For those already holding a nursing license, pursuing an rn to np bridge program can be a strategic choice to advance from registered nurse (RN) to nurse practitioner (NP). These programs often combine theoretical learning with practical clinical experiences.

If you’re interested in public health, wellness, or dietetics, a nutrition degree online is an option to consider. These degrees can lead to careers in counseling, education, or nutritional research.

Aspiring healthcare administrators may benefit from enrolling in one of the best online mha programs. Earning a Master of Health Administration (MHA) opens doors for leadership roles in hospitals or health organizations.

Lastly, for nurses seeking to upgrade their qualifications without traditional clinical requirements, several rn to bsn no clinical hours programs are available, allowing career growth alongside work or family commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew Grey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles