World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
35
Citations
9412
World Ranking
9687
National Ranking
427

Susanne Scheibe publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Susanne Scheibe sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 106 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Susanne Scheibe D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Susanne Scheibe sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Susanne Scheibe is affiliated with the University of Groningen in the Netherlands. Their research spans several areas in psychology and social sciences, with a focus on topics related to work, aging, and well-being.

The main fields of study in Scheibe's work include:

  • Psychology
  • Social Sciences

Subfields of particular interest are:

  • General Health Professions
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Social Psychology
  • Demography
  • Sociology and Political Science

Prominent research topics covered in Scheibe's publications are:

  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Retirement, Disability, and Employment
  • Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Emotional Intelligence and Performance

Scheibe has contributed to multiple journals and venues, with frequent publications in:

  • Work Aging and Retirement
  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
  • Journal of Vocational Behavior
  • Innovation in Aging

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Scheibe include:

  • "Face masks reduce emotion-recognition accuracy and perceived closeness," 2021, PLoS ONE
  • "Generativity at work: A meta-analysis," 2020, Journal of Vocational Behavior
  • "Resilience during Crisis and the Role of Age: Involuntary Telework during the COVID-19 Pandemic," 2022, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • "Exceptional circumstances: Changes in teachers' work characteristics and well-being during COVID-19 lockdown," 2021, School Psychology
  • "Reaching the Heart or the Mind? Test of Two Theory-Based Training Programs to Improve Interactions Between Age-Diverse Coworkers," 2020, Academy of Management Learning and Education

Frequent co-authors in Scheibe's research network include:

  • Elissa El Khawli
  • Anita C. Keller
  • Felix Grundmann
  • Kai Epstude
  • Susan Reh

Best Publications

  • Emotional experience improves with age: evidence based on over 10 years of experience sampling.

    Laura L. Carstensen;Bulent Turan;Susanne Scheibe;Nilam Ram

  • Emotion-Regulation Choice

    Gal Sheppes;Susanne Scheibe;Gaurav Suri;James J. Gross

  • Emotional Aging: Recent Findings and Future Trends

    Susanne Scheibe;Laura L. Carstensen

  • Emotion regulation choice: A conceptual framework and supporting evidence.

    Gal Sheppes;Susanne Scheibe;Gaurav Suri;Peter Radu

  • Age-related differences in valence and arousal ratings of pictures from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Do ratings become more extreme with age?

    Daniel Grühn;Susanne Scheibe

  • Effects of regulating emotions on cognitive performance: What is costly for young adults is not so costly for older adults.

    Susanne Scheibe;Fredda Blanchard-Fields

  • Face masks reduce emotion-recognition accuracy and perceived closeness.

    Felix Grundmann;Kai Epstude;Susanne Scheibe

  • Distract or reappraise? Age-related differences in emotion-regulation choice.

    Susanne Scheibe;Gal Sheppes;Ursula M. Staudinger

  • When Feeling Bad Can Be Good: Mixed Emotions Benefit Physical Health Across Adulthood

    Hal E. Hershfield;Susanne Scheibe;Tamara L. Sims;Laura L. Carstensen

  • A lifespan perspective on emotion regulation, stress, and well-being in the workplace

    Susanne Scheibe;Hannes Zacher

  • Striving to Feel Good: Ideal Affect, Actual Affect, and Their Correspondence Across Adulthood

    Susanne Scheibe;Tammy English;Jeanne L. Tsai;Laura L. Carstensen

  • The selection, optimization, and compensation model in the work context: A systematic review and meta-analysis of two decades of research

    Darya Moghimi;Hannes Zacher;Susanne Scheibe;Nico W. Van Yperen

  • A literature review and emotion-based model of age and leadership: New directions for the trait approach

    Frank Walter;Susanne Scheibe

  • Life contexts make a difference: Emotional stability in younger and older adults.

    Annette Brose;Susanne Scheibe;Florian Schmiedek

  • Reduced negativity effect in older adults' memory for emotional pictures: the heterogeneity-homogeneity list paradigm.

    Daniel Grühn;Susanne Scheibe;Paul B. Baltes

  • Toward a developmental psychology of Sehnsucht (life-longings) : The optimal (utopian) life

    Susanne Scheibe;Alexandra M. Freund;Paul B. Baltes

  • Replicating the positivity effect in picture memory in Koreans: evidence for cross-cultural generalizability.

    Yookyung Kwon;Susanne Scheibe;Gregory R. Samanez-Larkin;Jeanne L. Tsai

  • Are there gender differences in major depression and its response to antidepressants

    Susanne Scheibe;Claudia Preuschhof;Carolina Cristi;R.Michael Bagby

  • Catering to the Needs of an Aging Workforce: The Role of Employee Age in the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Employee Satisfaction

    Barbara Wisse;Rob van Eijbergen;Eric F. Rietzschel;Susanne Scheibe

  • Emotional competencies across adulthood : State of knowledge and implications for the work context

    Friederike Doerwald;Susanne Scheibe;Hannes Zacher;Nico W. Van Yperen

Frequent Co-Authors

Nico W. Van Yperen
Nico W. Van Yperen University of Groningen
Hannes Zacher
Hannes Zacher Leipzig University
Paul B. Baltes
Paul B. Baltes Max Planck Institute for Human Development
Laura L. Carstensen
Laura L. Carstensen Stanford University
Tom Postmes
Tom Postmes University of Groningen
Barbara Wisse
Barbara Wisse University of Groningen
Alexandra M. Freund
Alexandra M. Freund University of Zurich
Gal Sheppes
Gal Sheppes Tel Aviv University
Andreas Hirschi
Andreas Hirschi University of Bern
Fredda Blanchard-Fields
Fredda Blanchard-Fields Georgia Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens a wide array of academic and professional options. Many students consider the flexibility and affordability of online programs. For those seeking advanced credentials, cheap psyd programs online can offer a cost-effective route to a doctoral degree and clinical practice.

For students interested in the intersection of psychology and the law, a specialized degree can lead to a rewarding career in criminal justice. It's useful to be informed about criminal psychologist salary expectations before deciding on this pathway.

Graduate students often debate between a counseling or social work focus. Understanding the difference between a masters in counseling vs masters in social work is key to choosing the best match for your career aspirations in mental health and community services.

If you want a quicker route to entry-level roles, it's also worth reviewing what are the easiest psychology degrees to get. These degrees can provide a solid foundation and open doors to a variety of fields, from human resources to case management.

Best Scientists Citing Susanne Scheibe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles