World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Gregory R. Samanez-Larkin

Gregory R. Samanez-Larkin

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 40 8089 7549 4335 3943 110 10116

Gregory R. Samanez-Larkin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Gregory R. Samanez-Larkin between 1970 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Gregory R. Samanez-Larkin published across 57 years, from 1970 to 2026, averaging 2.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2017. 5 of the 134 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2017. 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 2 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 9 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 4 publications 2026: 1 publication
1970 2026

134 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Gregory R. Samanez-Larkin: publications per year, 1970 to 2026
Year Publications
1970 1
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 0
2006 0
2007 1
2008 2
2009 3
2010 1
2011 9
2012 3
2013 8
2014 8
2015 3
2016 10
2017 19
2018 12
2019 18
2020 7
2021 8
2022 5
2023 9
2024 2
2025 4
2026 1
Total 134
Download as CSV

Gregory R. Samanez-Larkin publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gregory R. Samanez-Larkin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 110 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 110
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Gregory R. Samanez-Larkin D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gregory R. Samanez-Larkin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 40
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Gregory R. Samanez-Larkin is affiliated with Duke University in the United States. Their research spans multiple domains within psychology and neuroscience, with a particular focus on aging and gerontology, mental health, neural and behavioral psychology, and decision-making processes.

The main fields of study for this scientist include:

  • Psychology (23 publications)
  • Neuroscience (11 publications)

Within these fields, the subfields of study encompass:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience (10 publications)
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (7 publications)
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (6 publications)
  • Sociology and Political Science (5 publications)
  • Applied Psychology (5 publications)

The primary research topics covered by Gregory R. Samanez-Larkin include:

  • Aging and Gerontology Research (14 publications)
  • Mental Health Research Topics (10 publications)
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (10 publications)
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions (10 publications)
  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (6 publications)
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts (6 publications)
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (4 publications)

Notable frequent coauthors in their work are:

  • Kendra Leigh Seaman (7 collaborations)
  • Jaime J. Castrellon (5 collaborations)
  • Alyssa Hannah Sinclair (5 collaborations)
  • Morgan Taylor (5 collaborations)
  • David H. Zald (4 collaborations)

Gregory R. Samanez-Larkin has published consistently in certain venues, which include:

  • Psychology and Aging (3 publications)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (3 publications)
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B (2 publications)
  • Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition (2 publications)
  • Emotion (1 publication)

Some recent papers reflecting their research focus are:

  • "Emotion dynamics across adulthood in everyday life: Older adults are more emotionally stable and better at regulating desires." (2020, Emotion)
  • "Temporal discounting across adulthood: A systematic review and meta-analysis." (2022, Psychology and Aging)
  • "Pairing facts with imagined consequences improves pandemic-related risk perception" (2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
  • "Reasons for Receiving or Not Receiving Bivalent COVID-19 Booster Vaccinations Among Adults - United States, November 1-December 10, 2022" (2023, MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report)
  • "Dopaminergic modulation of reward discounting in healthy rats: a systematic review and meta-analysis" (2020, Psychopharmacology)

Best Publications

  • Emotional experience improves with age: evidence based on over 10 years of experience sampling.

    Laura L. Carstensen;Bulent Turan;Susanne Scheibe;Nilam Ram

  • Variability in the analysis of a single neuroimaging dataset by many teams

    Rotem Botvinik-Nezer;Rotem Botvinik-Nezer;Felix Holzmeister;Colin F. Camerer;Anna Dreber;Anna Dreber

  • Moment-to-moment brain signal variability: A next frontier in human brain mapping?

    Douglas D. Garrett;Gregory R. Samanez-Larkin;Stuart W.S. MacDonald;Ulman Lindenberger

  • Age differences in risky choice: a meta-analysis

    Rui Mata;Anika K. Josef;Gregory R. Samanez-Larkin;Ralph Hertwig

  • Mechanisms of motivation-cognition interaction: Challenges and opportunities

    Todd S. Braver;Marie K. Krug;Kimberly S. Chiew;Wouter Kool

  • Anticipation of monetary gain but not loss in healthy older adults

    Gregory R Samanez-Larkin;Sasha E B Gibbs;Sasha E B Gibbs;Kabir Khanna;Lisbeth Nielsen

  • Don't stop thinking about tomorrow: Individual differences in future self-continuity account for saving.

    Hal Ersner-Hershfield;M. Tess Garton;Kacey Ballard;Gregory R. Samanez-Larkin

  • Decision making in the ageing brain: changes in affective and motivational circuits

    Gregory R. Samanez-Larkin;Brian Knutson

  • Stability and change in risk-taking propensity across the adult life span.

    Anika K. Josef;David Richter;Gregory R. Samanez-Larkin;Gert G. Wagner

  • Variability in nucleus accumbens activity mediates age-related suboptimal financial risk taking

    Gregory R. Samanez-Larkin;Camelia M. Kuhnen;Daniel J. Yoo;Brian Knutson

  • Reduced dopamine receptors and transporters but not synthesis capacity in normal aging adults: a meta-analysis.

    Teresa M. Karrer;Anika K. Josef;Rui Mata;Evan D. Morris

  • Individual Differences in Insular Sensitivity During Loss Anticipation Predict Avoidance Learning

    Gregory R. Samanez-Larkin;Nick G. Hollon;Laura L. Carstensen;Brian Knutson

  • Affective traits link to reliable neural markers of incentive anticipation

    Charlene C. Wu;Gregory R. Samanez-Larkin;Kiefer Katovich;Brian Knutson

  • Frontostriatal White Matter Integrity Mediates Adult Age Differences in Probabilistic Reward Learning

    Gregory R. Samanez-Larkin;Sara M. Levens;Lee M. Perry;Robert F. Dougherty

  • Group comparisons: imaging the aging brain

    Gregory R. Samanez-Larkin;Mark D’Esposito

  • Adult age differences in frontostriatal representation of prediction error but not reward outcome.

    Gregory R. Samanez-Larkin;Darrell A. Worthy;Rui Mata;Rui Mata;Samuel M. McClure

  • Replicating the positivity effect in picture memory in Koreans: evidence for cross-cultural generalizability.

    Yookyung Kwon;Susanne Scheibe;Gregory R. Samanez-Larkin;Jeanne L. Tsai

  • Socioemotional Functioning and the Aging Brain

    Gregory R. Samanez-Larkin;Laura L. Carstensen

  • Age Differences in Striatal Delay Sensitivity during Intertemporal Choice in Healthy Adults.

    Gregory R. Samanez-Larkin;Rui Mata;Peter T. Radu;Ian C. Ballard

  • White-Matter Tract Connecting Anterior Insula to Nucleus Accumbens Correlates with Reduced Preference for Positively Skewed Gambles

    Josiah K. Leong;Franco Pestilli;Charlene C. Wu;Gregory R. Samanez-Larkin

Frequent Co-Authors

Brian Knutson
Brian Knutson Stanford University
David H. Zald
David H. Zald Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Rui Mata
Rui Mata University of Basel
Laura L. Carstensen
Laura L. Carstensen Stanford University
Jean M. Vettel
Jean M. Vettel United States Army Research Laboratory
Anna Dreber
Anna Dreber Stockholm School of Economics
Bharat B. Biswal
Bharat B. Biswal New Jersey Institute of Technology
Scott A. Huettel
Scott A. Huettel Duke University
Ralph Hertwig
Ralph Hertwig Max Planck Institute for Human Development
Colin F. Camerer
Colin F. Camerer California Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of rewarding career paths. Among the most impactful roles is that of a school counselor. Each state has its own unique requirements, so it’s important to understand the educational pathways and certifications needed.

Many aspiring counselors begin with a bachelor’s degree in psychology or a related field, followed by a master’s degree in school counseling. If you’re considering this path, reviewing state-specific regulations is essential. For example, you can learn more about the requirements to be a school counselor in Utah, explore the steps on how to become a school counselor in Vermont, or read about becoming a school counselor in Virginia.

Online psychology degrees can offer flexibility and accessibility for working professionals or those balancing multiple commitments. If you’re interested in working in a different region, find out how to become a school counselor in Washington. No matter where you are, online programs can help you pursue licensure and make a meaningful difference in students’ lives.

Best Scientists Citing Gregory R. Samanez-Larkin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles