World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
85
Citations
24832
World Ranking
14671
National Ranking
7420

Patrick I. Borgen publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick I. Borgen sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 208 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Patrick I. Borgen D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick I. Borgen sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Patrick I. Borgen is affiliated with Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in the United States and has a research focus predominantly in medicine with substantial contributions to biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their work spans several subfields including cancer research, oncology, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, surgery, and genetics.

The scientist's research topics extensively cover breast cancer treatment studies, advances in oncology and radiotherapy, BRCA gene mutations in cancer, anesthesia and pain management, breast lesions and carcinomas, diversity and career in medicine, as well as pain management and opioid use.

Patrick I. Borgen has published papers in various academic journals, with frequent appearances in the Annals of Surgical Oncology, where they have contributed to at least ten papers. Other notable venues include the International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, the Journal of Surgical Research, the Journal of Blood Medicine, and Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

  • The Clinical Utility of a 7-Gene Biosignature on Radiation Therapy Decision Making in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Following Breast-Conserving Surgery: An Updated Analysis of the DCISionRT® PREDICT Study (2024), Annals of Surgical Oncology
  • Obese Patients Who Receive an Opioid-Sparing Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocol are at Increased Risk of Persistent Pain After Breast Surgery (2020), Annals of Surgical Oncology
  • Correlation of Automated Chemiluminescent Method with Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) Antibody Titers in Convalescent COVID-19 Plasma Samples: Development of Rapid, Cost-Effective Semi-Quantitative Diagnostic Methods (2021), Journal of Blood Medicine
  • Lack of Racial Diversity in Surgery and Pathology Textbooks Depicting Diseases of the Breast (2023), Journal of Surgical Research
  • Opioid-Sparing Multimodal Analgesia Protocol for Lumpectomy Patients Results in Superior Postoperative Pain Control (2021), Annals of Surgical Oncology

Frequent collaborators in research include Kristin E. Rojas, Charusheela Andaz, Donna-Marie Manasseh, Pat W. Whitworth, and Troy Bremer. The scientist's work reflects a sustained engagement in interdisciplinary studies combining molecular biology, clinical oncology, and surgical practices.

Best Publications

  • Revision of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System for Breast Cancer

    S. Eva Singletary;Craig Allred;Pandora Ashley;Lawrence W. Bassett

  • Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.

    Noah D. Kauff;Jaya M. Satagopan;Mark E. Robson;Lauren Scheuer

  • A Nomogram for Predicting the Likelihood of Additional Nodal Metastases in Breast Cancer Patients With a Positive Sentinel Node Biopsy

    Kimberly J. Van Zee;Donna Marie E Manasseh;Jose L B Bevilacqua;Susan K. Boolbol

  • Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: initial experience at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.

    Brian J O’Hea;Arnold D.K Hill;Ayda M El-Shirbiny;Samuel D.J Yeh

  • Frequent Mutation of the PIK3CA Gene in Ovarian and Breast Cancers

    Douglas A. Levine;Faina Bogomolniy;Cindy J. Yee;Alex Lash

  • Outcome of Preventive Surgery and Screening for Breast and Ovarian Cancer in BRCA Mutation Carriers

    Lauren Scheuer;Noah Kauff;Mark Robson;Bridget Kelly

  • The risk of axillary relapse after sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer is comparable with that of axillary lymph node dissection: a follow-up study of 4008 procedures

    Arpana M. Naik;Jane Fey;Mary Gemignani;Alexandra Heerdt

  • The carrier frequency of the BRCA2 6174delT mutation among Ashkenazi Jewish individuals is approximately 1

    C. Oddoux;J. P. Struewing;C. M. Clayton;S. Neuhausen

  • Breast cancer screening and diagnosis: Clinical practice guidelines in oncology™

    Therese B. Bevers;Benjamin O. Anderson;Ermelinda Bonaccio;Patrick I. Borgen

  • Lessons learned from 500 cases of lymphatic mapping for breast cancer.

    Arnold D.k. Hill;Katherine N. Tran;Tim Akhurst;Henry Yeung

  • BRCA-associated breast cancer in young women.

    M Robson;T Gilewski;B Haas;D Levin

  • Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk reduction: oncologic or technical problem?

    Virgilio Sacchini;José A. Pinotti;Alfredo C.S.D. Barros;Alberto Luini

  • Sentinel lymph node biopsy: is it indicated in patients with high-risk ductal carcinoma-in-situ and ductal carcinoma-in-situ with microinvasion?

    Nancy Klauber-DeMore;Lee K. Tan;Laura Liberman;Stamatina Kaptain

  • Staging system for breast cancer: revisions for the 6th edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual.

    S.Eva Singletary;Craig Allred;Pandora Ashley;Lawrence W Bassett

  • Doctor, What Are My Chances of Having a Positive Sentinel Node? A Validated Nomogram for Risk Estimation

    José Luiz B. Bevilacqua;Michael W. Kattan;Jane V. Fey;Hiram S. Cody

  • Recurrent BRCA2 6174delT mutations in Ashkenazi Jewish women affected by breast cancer.

    Susan Neuhausen;Teresa Gilewski;Larry Norton;Thao Tran

  • Mutation Analysis of the Putative Tumor Suppressor Gene PTEN/MMAC1 in Primary Breast Carcinomas

    Esther Rhei;Lan Kang;Faina Bogomolniy;Mark G. Federici

  • Complementarity of blue dye and isotope in sentinel node localization for breast cancer: univariate and multivariate analysis of 966 procedures.

    Hiram S. Cody;Jane Fey;Tim Akhurst;Melissa Fazzari

  • N-cadherin promotes adhesion between invasive breast cancer cells and the stroma.

    Rachel B. Hazan;Lan Kang;Brian P. Whooley;Patrick I. Borgen

  • Hereditary breast cancer.

    Mark E. Robson;Jeff Boyd;Patrick I. Borgen;Hiram S. Cody

Frequent Co-Authors

Kimberly J. Van Zee
Kimberly J. Van Zee Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Larry Norton
Larry Norton Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Mark E. Robson
Mark E. Robson Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Kenneth Offit
Kenneth Offit Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Paul Peter Rosen
Paul Peter Rosen Cornell University
Jeff Boyd
Jeff Boyd Fox Chase Cancer Center
Clifford A. Hudis
Clifford A. Hudis Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Elizabeth A. Morris
Elizabeth A. Morris Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Laura Liberman
Laura Liberman Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Richard R. Barakat
Richard R. Barakat Northwell Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Aspiring healthcare professionals have a wide range of educational and career paths to consider beyond traditional medical school. For those exploring nursing, it is important to know the entrance requirements—some schools offer programs where do you have to take a teas test for lpn is not a concern, providing a more accessible route into licensed practical nursing.

Healthcare isn’t limited to direct patient care. Administrative roles are critical, and there are now flexible options to earn healthcare administration degrees online. These programs can help you move into management or leadership in various healthcare settings.

Nurses seeking to advance may be interested in RN to NP pathways, and there are several rn to np programs designed for RNs who want to become nurse practitioners. These bridge programs can typically be completed online, allowing working nurses to continue their education without putting their careers on hold.

For those passionate about preventative care and healthy lifestyles, pursuing a nutrition bachelor degree online can open doors to roles in dietetics, wellness coaching, and public health initiatives.

Best Scientists Citing Patrick I. Borgen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles