World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 85 14670 13817 7419 6870 208 24832

Patrick I. Borgen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Patrick I. Borgen between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Patrick I. Borgen published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 6.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2001. 11 of the 220 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2001. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 10 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 16 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 21 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 20 publications 2005: 20 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 2 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 1 publication 2014: 1 publication 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 5 publications 2025: 6 publications
1990 2025

220 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Patrick I. Borgen: publications per year, 1990 to 2025
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 2
1992 4
1993 2
1994 4
1995 9
1996 5
1997 10
1998 9
1999 16
2000 9
2001 21
2002 12
2003 9
2004 20
2005 20
2006 9
2007 12
2008 5
2009 4
2010 1
2011 2
2012 1
2013 1
2014 1
2015 0
2016 0
2017 2
2018 3
2019 5
2020 5
2021 2
2022 2
2023 1
2024 5
2025 6
Total 220
Download as CSV

Patrick I. Borgen publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick I. Borgen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 201–220 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 208 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363 208
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Patrick I. Borgen D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick I. Borgen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 84–85 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003 85
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Patrick I. Borgen is affiliated with Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in the United States and has a research focus predominantly in medicine with substantial contributions to biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their work spans several subfields including cancer research, oncology, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, surgery, and genetics.

The scientist's research topics extensively cover breast cancer treatment studies, advances in oncology and radiotherapy, BRCA gene mutations in cancer, anesthesia and pain management, breast lesions and carcinomas, diversity and career in medicine, as well as pain management and opioid use.

Patrick I. Borgen has published papers in various academic journals, with frequent appearances in the Annals of Surgical Oncology, where they have contributed to at least ten papers. Other notable venues include the International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, the Journal of Surgical Research, the Journal of Blood Medicine, and Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

  • The Clinical Utility of a 7-Gene Biosignature on Radiation Therapy Decision Making in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Following Breast-Conserving Surgery: An Updated Analysis of the DCISionRT® PREDICT Study (2024), Annals of Surgical Oncology
  • Obese Patients Who Receive an Opioid-Sparing Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocol are at Increased Risk of Persistent Pain After Breast Surgery (2020), Annals of Surgical Oncology
  • Correlation of Automated Chemiluminescent Method with Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) Antibody Titers in Convalescent COVID-19 Plasma Samples: Development of Rapid, Cost-Effective Semi-Quantitative Diagnostic Methods (2021), Journal of Blood Medicine
  • Lack of Racial Diversity in Surgery and Pathology Textbooks Depicting Diseases of the Breast (2023), Journal of Surgical Research
  • Opioid-Sparing Multimodal Analgesia Protocol for Lumpectomy Patients Results in Superior Postoperative Pain Control (2021), Annals of Surgical Oncology

Frequent collaborators in research include Kristin E. Rojas, Charusheela Andaz, Donna-Marie Manasseh, Pat W. Whitworth, and Troy Bremer. The scientist's work reflects a sustained engagement in interdisciplinary studies combining molecular biology, clinical oncology, and surgical practices.

Best Publications

  • Revision of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System for Breast Cancer

    S. Eva Singletary;Craig Allred;Pandora Ashley;Lawrence W. Bassett

  • Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.

    Noah D. Kauff;Jaya M. Satagopan;Mark E. Robson;Lauren Scheuer

  • A Nomogram for Predicting the Likelihood of Additional Nodal Metastases in Breast Cancer Patients With a Positive Sentinel Node Biopsy

    Kimberly J. Van Zee;Donna Marie E Manasseh;Jose L B Bevilacqua;Susan K. Boolbol

  • Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: initial experience at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.

    Brian J O’Hea;Arnold D.K Hill;Ayda M El-Shirbiny;Samuel D.J Yeh

  • Frequent Mutation of the PIK3CA Gene in Ovarian and Breast Cancers

    Douglas A. Levine;Faina Bogomolniy;Cindy J. Yee;Alex Lash

  • Outcome of Preventive Surgery and Screening for Breast and Ovarian Cancer in BRCA Mutation Carriers

    Lauren Scheuer;Noah Kauff;Mark Robson;Bridget Kelly

  • The risk of axillary relapse after sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer is comparable with that of axillary lymph node dissection: a follow-up study of 4008 procedures

    Arpana M. Naik;Jane Fey;Mary Gemignani;Alexandra Heerdt

  • The carrier frequency of the BRCA2 6174delT mutation among Ashkenazi Jewish individuals is approximately 1

    C. Oddoux;J. P. Struewing;C. M. Clayton;S. Neuhausen

  • Breast cancer screening and diagnosis: Clinical practice guidelines in oncology™

    Therese B. Bevers;Benjamin O. Anderson;Ermelinda Bonaccio;Patrick I. Borgen

  • Lessons learned from 500 cases of lymphatic mapping for breast cancer.

    Arnold D.k. Hill;Katherine N. Tran;Tim Akhurst;Henry Yeung

  • BRCA-associated breast cancer in young women.

    M Robson;T Gilewski;B Haas;D Levin

  • Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk reduction: oncologic or technical problem?

    Virgilio Sacchini;José A. Pinotti;Alfredo C.S.D. Barros;Alberto Luini

  • Sentinel lymph node biopsy: is it indicated in patients with high-risk ductal carcinoma-in-situ and ductal carcinoma-in-situ with microinvasion?

    Nancy Klauber-DeMore;Lee K. Tan;Laura Liberman;Stamatina Kaptain

  • Staging system for breast cancer: revisions for the 6th edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual.

    S.Eva Singletary;Craig Allred;Pandora Ashley;Lawrence W Bassett

  • Doctor, What Are My Chances of Having a Positive Sentinel Node? A Validated Nomogram for Risk Estimation

    José Luiz B. Bevilacqua;Michael W. Kattan;Jane V. Fey;Hiram S. Cody

  • Recurrent BRCA2 6174delT mutations in Ashkenazi Jewish women affected by breast cancer.

    Susan Neuhausen;Teresa Gilewski;Larry Norton;Thao Tran

  • Mutation Analysis of the Putative Tumor Suppressor Gene PTEN/MMAC1 in Primary Breast Carcinomas

    Esther Rhei;Lan Kang;Faina Bogomolniy;Mark G. Federici

  • Complementarity of blue dye and isotope in sentinel node localization for breast cancer: univariate and multivariate analysis of 966 procedures.

    Hiram S. Cody;Jane Fey;Tim Akhurst;Melissa Fazzari

  • N-cadherin promotes adhesion between invasive breast cancer cells and the stroma.

    Rachel B. Hazan;Lan Kang;Brian P. Whooley;Patrick I. Borgen

  • Hereditary breast cancer.

    Mark E. Robson;Jeff Boyd;Patrick I. Borgen;Hiram S. Cody

Frequent Co-Authors

Kimberly J. Van Zee
Kimberly J. Van Zee Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Larry Norton
Larry Norton Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Mark E. Robson
Mark E. Robson Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Kenneth Offit
Kenneth Offit Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Paul Peter Rosen
Paul Peter Rosen Cornell University
Jeff Boyd
Jeff Boyd Fox Chase Cancer Center
Clifford A. Hudis
Clifford A. Hudis Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Elizabeth A. Morris
Elizabeth A. Morris Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Laura Liberman
Laura Liberman Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Richard R. Barakat
Richard R. Barakat Northwell Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Aspiring healthcare professionals have a wide range of educational and career paths to consider beyond traditional medical school. For those exploring nursing, it is important to know the entrance requirements—some schools offer programs where do you have to take a teas test for lpn is not a concern, providing a more accessible route into licensed practical nursing.

Healthcare isn’t limited to direct patient care. Administrative roles are critical, and there are now flexible options to earn healthcare administration degrees online. These programs can help you move into management or leadership in various healthcare settings.

Nurses seeking to advance may be interested in RN to NP pathways, and there are several rn to np programs designed for RNs who want to become nurse practitioners. These bridge programs can typically be completed online, allowing working nurses to continue their education without putting their careers on hold.

For those passionate about preventative care and healthy lifestyles, pursuing a nutrition bachelor degree online can open doors to roles in dietetics, wellness coaching, and public health initiatives.

Best Scientists Citing Patrick I. Borgen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles