World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
64
Citations
14152
World Ranking
1873
National Ranking
687

Daniel C. Reed publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel C. Reed sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 182 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Daniel C. Reed D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel C. Reed sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel C. Reed is affiliated with the University of California, Santa Barbara in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within environmental science and earth and planetary sciences, with a strong emphasis on marine and coastal ecosystems.

The main fields of study for Daniel C. Reed include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences

More specific subfields of study are:

  • Ecology
  • Oceanography
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Ecological Modeling
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Daniel C. Reed's work centers on several key scientific topics, including:

  • Marine and coastal plant biology
  • Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
  • Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
  • Marine and fisheries research
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Marine Biology and Ecology Research
  • Marine and coastal ecosystems

They have contributed to numerous recent papers with a focus on marine environments and ecosystem dynamics. Notable publications include:

  • Challenges for Restoration of Coastal Marine Ecosystems in the Anthropocene (2020), published in Frontiers in Marine Science
  • Foundation species promote community stability by increasing diversity in a giant kelp forest (2020), published in Ecology
  • Evidence that spillover from Marine Protected Areas benefits the spiny lobster (Panulirus interruptus) fishery in southern California (2021), published in Scientific Reports
  • A Review of the Opportunities and Challenges for Using Remote Sensing for Management of Surface-Canopy Forming Kelps (2021), published in Frontiers in Marine Science
  • The Blob marine heatwave transforms California kelp forest ecosystems (2022), published in Communications Biology

Frequently, Daniel C. Reed collaborates with other researchers, including:

  • Robert J. Miller
  • Adrian C. Stier
  • Filipe Alberto
  • Hunter S. Lenihan
  • Tom W. Bell

The scientist regularly publishes in venues such as:

  • Frontiers in Marine Science
  • Ecology
  • Scientific Reports
  • Communications Biology
  • Journal of Phycology

Best Publications

  • Global patterns of kelp forest change over the past half-century

    Kira A. Krumhansl;Daniel K. Okamoto;Andrew Rassweiler;Mark Novak

  • The Effects of Canopy Shadings on Algal Recruitment and Growth in a Giant Kelp Forest

    Daniel C. Reed;Michael S. Foster

  • Food Availability, Sea Urchin Grazing, and Kelp Forest Community Structure

    Christopher Harrold;Daniel C. Reed

  • BioTIME: A database of biodiversity time series for the Anthropocene

    Maria Dornelas;Laura H. Antão;Laura H. Antão;Faye Moyes;Amanda E. Bates;Amanda E. Bates

  • Herbivory on coral reefs: community structure following mass mortalities of sea urchins

    Terence P. Hughes;Daniel C. Reed;Mary-Jo Boyle

  • Conceptual Issues Relevant to Marine Harvest Refuges: Examples from Temperate Reef Fishes

    Mark H. Carr;Daniel C. Reed

  • Variation in Algal Dispersal and Recruitment: The Importance of Episodic Events

    Daniel C. Reed;David R. Laur;Alfred W. Ebeling

  • The Effects of Variable Settlement and Early Competition on Patterns of Kelp Recruitment

    Daniel C. Reed

  • Climate-driven increases in storm frequency simplify kelp forest food webs

    Jarrett E. Byrnes;Daniel C. Reed;Bradley J. Cardinale;Kyle C. Cavanaugh

  • A welcome can of worms? Hypoxia mitigation by an invasive species

    Joanna Norkko;Joanna Norkko;Daniel C. Reed;Daniel C. Reed;Karen Timmermann;Alf Norkko;Alf Norkko

  • Hypoxia in the Baltic Sea: Biogeochemical Cycles, Benthic Fauna, and Management

    Jacob Carstensen;Daniel J. Conley;Erik Bonsdorff;Bo G. Gustafsson

  • A PHYSICALLY BASED MODEL OF MACROALGAL SPORE DISPERSAL IN THE WAVE AND CURRENT‐DOMINATED NEARSHORE

    Brian Gaylord;Daniel C. Reed;Peter T. Raimondi;Libe Washburn

  • Biomass rather than growth rate determines variation in net primary production by giant kelp.

    Daniel C. Reed;Andrew Rassweiler;Katie K. Arkema

  • Spatial patterns of flow and their modification within and around a giant kelp forest

    Brian Gaylord;Johanna Heidi Rosman;Daniel C. Reed;Jeffrey R. Koseff

  • The microbiology of deep-sea hydrothermal vent plumes: ecological and biogeographic linkages to seafloor and water column habitats

    Gregory J. Dick;Karthik Anantharaman;Brett J. Baker;Meng Li

  • Wave disturbance overwhelms top-down and bottom-up control of primary production in California kelp forests.

    Daniel C. Reed;Andrew Rassweiler;Mark H. Carr;Kyle C. Cavanaugh

  • Environmental controls of giant-kelp biomass in the Santa Barbara Channel, California

    Kyle C. Cavanaugh;David A. Siegel;Daniel C. Reed;Philip E. Dennison

  • Dispersal in Kelps: Factors Affecting Spore Swimming and Competency

    Daniel C. Reed;Charles D. Amsler;Alfred W. Ebeling

  • Gene-centric approach to integrating environmental genomics and biogeochemical models

    Daniel C. Reed;Christopher K. Algar;Julie A. Huber;Gregory J. Dick

  • Coupled dynamics of iron and phosphorus in sediments of an oligotrophic coastal basin and the impact of anaerobic oxidation of methane.

    Caroline P. Slomp;Haydon P. Mort;Haydon P. Mort;Tom Jilbert;Daniel C. Reed

  • Sedimentary phosphorus dynamics and the evolution of bottom-water hypoxia: A coupled benthic-pelagic model of a coastal system

    Daniel C. Reed;Caroline P. Slomp;Bo G. Gustafsson

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert J. Miller
Robert J. Miller University of California, Santa Barbara
Peter T. Raimondi
Peter T. Raimondi University of California, Santa Cruz
Sally J. Holbrook
Sally J. Holbrook University of California, Santa Barbara
Kyle C. Cavanaugh
Kyle C. Cavanaugh University of California, Los Angeles
Caroline P. Slomp
Caroline P. Slomp Radboud University
David A. Siegel
David A. Siegel University of California, Santa Barbara
Mark A. Brzezinski
Mark A. Brzezinski University of California, Santa Barbara
Bo G. Gustafsson
Bo G. Gustafsson Stockholm University
Libe Washburn
Libe Washburn University of California, Santa Barbara
Brian Gaylord
Brian Gaylord University of California, Davis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution opens doors to a variety of related fields and flexible online degree options. For students seeking versatile programs, consider online interdisciplinary studies bachelor programs low cost. These allow you to tailor your studies to emerging topics in biology, environmental science, and beyond.

If you’re interested in understanding how living systems have changed over time, pursuing a masters in history can be an excellent way to develop research and analytical skills relevant to evolutionary studies.

Careers in science communication or supporting research may require further credentials. The cheapest masters in library science can prepare you for roles in academic libraries, digital archiving, or data management—important for sharing discoveries in ecology.

For those drawn to applied science careers, asha accredited online slp programs offer pathways to clinical practice and support roles, especially where biology and communication intersect.

Expanding your education with these online programs can create new opportunities to apply ecological knowledge across industries.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel C. Reed

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles