World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Best Female Scientists
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Best Female Scientists 140 238 224 150 141 926 73883
Medicine 146 1345 1243 781 710 1242 73539

Kelly K. Hunt publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kelly K. Hunt between 1969 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kelly K. Hunt published across 57 years, from 1969 to 2025, averaging 24.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 285 publications in 2023. 147 of the 1,399 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1969 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 285. Peak 285 publications in 2023. 1969: 1 publication 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 25 publications 2000: 18 publications 2001: 24 publications 2002: 35 publications 2003: 28 publications 2004: 58 publications 2005: 44 publications 2006: 47 publications 2007: 32 publications 2008: 40 publications 2009: 47 publications 2010: 37 publications 2011: 46 publications 2012: 45 publications 2013: 28 publications 2014: 32 publications 2015: 52 publications 2016: 46 publications 2017: 47 publications 2018: 36 publications 2019: 39 publications 2020: 43 publications 2021: 34 publications 2022: 53 publications 2023: 285 publications 2024: 112 publications 2025: 35 publications
1969 2025

1,399 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kelly K. Hunt: publications per year, 1969 to 2025
Year Publications
1969 1
1970 1
1971 0
1972 1
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 1
1993 0
1994 6
1995 3
1996 3
1997 9
1998 6
1999 25
2000 18
2001 24
2002 35
2003 28
2004 58
2005 44
2006 47
2007 32
2008 40
2009 47
2010 37
2011 46
2012 45
2013 28
2014 32
2015 52
2016 46
2017 47
2018 36
2019 39
2020 43
2021 34
2022 53
2023 285
2024 112
2025 35
Total 1,399
Download as CSV

Kelly K. Hunt publications per year - data summary

  • Kelly K. Hunt, a Medicine scholar from The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, has 1,399 publications recorded across 57 years, from 1969 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1969 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2023, with 285 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1969, 1970, 1972 and 1992, with 1 publication each.
  • 21 of the 57 years in the span carry no publications at all (1971, 1973, 1974, 1975 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 24.5 papers per year over the whole span, or 38.9 per year counting only the 36 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 519 publications, 37% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1969-1987: 3 publications (0.2 per year); 1988-2006: 307 publications (16.2 per year); 2007-2025: 1,089 publications (57.3 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Kelly K. Hunt publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kelly K. Hunt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 1,241–1,260 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,242 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36 1,242
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Kelly K. Hunt publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Kelly K. Hunt, a Medicine scholar from The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, records 1,242 publications - the 97th percentile of the discipline.
  • 97% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Kelly K. Hunt, and about 3% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Kelly K. Hunt ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Kelly K. Hunt D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kelly K. Hunt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 146–147 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 146 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106 146
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Kelly K. Hunt D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Kelly K. Hunt, a Medicine scholar from The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, records 146 D-Index - the 94th percentile of the discipline.
  • 94% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Kelly K. Hunt, and about 6% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Kelly K. Hunt ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Female Scientists Award
  • 2017 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Kelly K. Hunt is affiliated with The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on medicine with a significant emphasis on oncology and cancer-related fields. Hunt's contributions span multiple subfields, including oncology, cancer research, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, pathology and forensic medicine, and surgery.

The scientist's work extensively covers a range of topics in cancer studies and treatment. Key areas of research include breast cancer treatment studies, advanced breast cancer therapies, breast lesions and carcinomas, sarcoma diagnosis and treatment, breast implant and reconstruction, HER2/EGFR in cancer research, and cancer-related molecular pathways.

Kelly K. Hunt has a substantial record of publications, notably in the following venues:

  • Annals of Surgical Oncology
  • Cancer Research
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • UNC Libraries
  • Cancers

Frequent collaborators in their research include Mediget Teshome, Khandan Keyomarsi, Christina L. Roland, Emily Z. Keung, and Keila E. Torres.

Significant recent papers authored or co-authored by Kelly K. Hunt include:

  • Effect of Axillary Dissection vs No Axillary Dissection on 10-Year Overall Survival Among Women With Invasive Breast Cancer and Sentinel Node Metastasis: The ACOSOG Z0011 (Alliance) Randomized Clinical Trial (2020), published in UNC Libraries
  • Anthracycline-containing and taxane-containing chemotherapy for early-stage operable breast cancer: a patient-level meta-analysis of 100,000 women from 86 randomised trials (2023), published in The Lancet
  • Comparison of Cancer Prevalence in Patients With Neurofibromatosis Type 1 at an Academic Cancer Center vs in the General Population From 1985 to 2020 (2021), published in JAMA Network Open
  • Eliminating breast surgery for invasive breast cancer in exceptional responders to neoadjuvant systemic therapy: a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial (2022), published in The Lancet Oncology
  • 2022 Practice Recommendation Updates From the World Consensus Conference on BIA-ALCL (2022), published in Aesthetic Surgery Journal

Kelly K. Hunt was recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2017.

Best Publications

  • Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: A randomized clinical trial

    Armando E. Giuliano;Kelly K. Hunt;Karla V. Ballman;Peter D. Beitsch

  • Locoregional recurrence after sentinel lymph node dissection with or without axillary dissection in patients with sentinel lymph node metastases: the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 randomized trial.

    Armando E. Giuliano;Linda McCall;Peter Beitsch;Pat W. Whitworth

  • Significantly Higher Pathologic Complete Remission Rate After Neoadjuvant Therapy With Trastuzumab, Paclitaxel, and Epirubicin Chemotherapy: Results of a Randomized Trial in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Positive Operable Breast Cancer

    Aman U. Buzdar;Nuhad K. Ibrahim;Deborah Francis;Daniel J. Booser

  • Effect of Axillary Dissection vs No Axillary Dissection on 10-Year Overall Survival Among Women With Invasive Breast Cancer and Sentinel Node Metastasis: The ACOSOG Z0011 (Alliance) Randomized Clinical Trial

    Armando E. Giuliano;Karla V. Ballman;Linda McCall;Peter D. Beitsch

  • Clinical Course of Breast Cancer Patients With Complete Pathologic Primary Tumor and Axillary Lymph Node Response to Doxorubicin-Based Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

    Henry M. Kuerer;Lisa A. Newman;Terry L. Smith;Fred C. Ames

  • Sentinel Lymph Node Surgery After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Node-Positive Breast Cancer: The ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance) Clinical Trial

    Judy C. Boughey;Vera J. Suman;Elizabeth A. Mittendorf;Gretchen M. Ahrendt

  • Whole-genome analysis informs breast cancer response to aromatase inhibition

    Matthew J. Ellis;Li Ding;Dong Shen;Jingqin Luo

  • Surgical Complications Associated With Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection (SLND) Plus Axillary Lymph Node Dissection Compared With SLND Alone in the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Trial Z0011

    Anthony Lucci;Linda Mackie McCall;Peter D. Beitsch;Patrick W. Whitworth

  • Improved Axillary Evaluation Following Neoadjuvant Therapy for Patients With Node-Positive Breast Cancer Using Selective Evaluation of Clipped Nodes: Implementation of Targeted Axillary Dissection

    Abigail S. Caudle;Wei T. Yang;Savitri Krishnamurthy;Elizabeth A. Mittendorf

  • A Genomic Predictor of Response and Survival Following Taxane-Anthracycline Chemotherapy for Invasive Breast Cancer

    Christos Hatzis;Lajos Pusztai;Vicente Valero;Daniel J. Booser

  • Surgical Complications Associated With Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy: Results From a Prospective International Cooperative Group Trial

    Lee Gravatt Wilke;Linda M. McCall;Katherine E. Posther;Pat W. Whitworth

  • Randomized Phase II Neoadjuvant Comparison Between Letrozole, Anastrozole, and Exemestane for Postmenopausal Women With Estrogen Receptor–Rich Stage 2 to 3 Breast Cancer: Clinical and Biomarker Outcomes and Predictive Value of the Baseline PAM50-Based Intrinsic Subtype—ACOSOG Z1031

    Matthew J. Ellis;Vera J. Suman;Jeremy Hoog;Li Lin

  • Neoadjuvant Therapy with Paclitaxel followed by 5-Fluorouracil, Epirubicin, and Cyclophosphamide Chemotherapy and Concurrent Trastuzumab in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Positive Operable Breast Cancer: An Update of the Initial Randomized Study Population and Data of Additional Patients Treated with the Same Regimen

    Aman U. Buzdar;Vicente Valero;Nuhad K. Ibrahim;Deborah Francis

  • Long-Term Prognostic Risk After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Associated With Residual Cancer Burden and Breast Cancer Subtype.

    W. Fraser Symmans;Caimiao Wei;Rebekah Gould;Xian Yu

  • Primary treatment of cystosarcoma phyllodes of the breast.

    Arthur W. Chaney;Alan Pollack M.D.;Marsha D. Mcneese;Gunar K. Zagars

  • Locoregional Recurrence After Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection With or Without Axillary Dissection in Patients with Sentinel Lymph Node Metastases: Long-Term Follow-Up from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (Alliance) ACOSOG Z0011 Randomized Trial

    Armando E. Giuliano;Karla Ballman;Linda McCall;Peter Beitsch

  • Meta-analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy after preoperative chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.

    Y. Xing;M. Foy;D. D. Cox;H. M. Kuerer

  • Weekly Paclitaxel Improves Pathologic Complete Remission in Operable Breast Cancer When Compared With Paclitaxel Once Every 3 Weeks

    Marjorie C. Green;Aman U. Buzdar;Terry Smith;Nuhad K. Ibrahim

  • Identification and Resection of Clipped Node Decreases the False-negative Rate of Sentinel Lymph Node Surgery in Patients Presenting With Node-positive Breast Cancer (T0-T4, N1-N2) Who Receive Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Results From ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance).

    Judy C. Boughey;Karla V. Ballman;Huong T. Le-Petross;Linda M. McCall

  • Complete Surgical Excision Is Essential for the Management of Patients With Breast Implant–Associated Anaplastic Large-Cell Lymphoma

    Mark W. Clemens;L. Jeffrey Medeiros;Charles E. Butler;Kelly K. Hunt

Frequent Co-Authors

Henry Mark Kuerer
Henry Mark Kuerer The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Barry W. Feig
Barry W. Feig The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Thomas A. Buchholz
Thomas A. Buchholz The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Elizabeth A. Mittendorf
Elizabeth A. Mittendorf Brigham and Women's Hospital
Funda Meric-Bernstam
Funda Meric-Bernstam The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Merrick I. Ross
Merrick I. Ross The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Gildy Babiera
Gildy Babiera The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
S. Eva Singletary
S. Eva Singletary The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Gabriel N. Hortobagyi
Gabriel N. Hortobagyi The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Aysegul A. Sahin
Aysegul A. Sahin The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can open new doors for those interested in healthcare but not ready to commit to a full medical school program. For instance, becoming a medical coder is a fast-growing career, with medical billing and coding schools with financial aid making this field even more accessible.

Nursing is another rewarding pathway. Many universities now offer nursing programs without teas or other entrance exams, streamlining admission for aspiring nurses.

For those with leadership ambitions, an online health administration degree can lead to management roles in hospitals or clinics, with many programs designed to be completed quickly and flexibly.

Registered nurses looking to further specialize can explore adn to np bridge programs, allowing a direct path from an associate degree to becoming a nurse practitioner.

Each of these online options encourages progress in healthcare while accommodating busy schedules, different career goals, and varied educational backgrounds.

Best Scientists Citing Kelly K. Hunt

Trending Scientists