World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
74
Citations
19737
World Ranking
19405
National Ranking
9666

Chandrajit P. Raut publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chandrajit P. Raut sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 335 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Chandrajit P. Raut D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chandrajit P. Raut sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Chandrajit P. Raut is affiliated with Brigham and Women's Hospital in the United States and has contributed extensively to medical research, particularly in oncology and related fields. Their work spans over 264 publications that primarily focus on the field of Medicine, with a significant number of studies in several subfields including Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, and Gastroenterology.

The main topics covered in their research include:

  • Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Cardiac Tumors and Thrombi
  • Vascular Tumors and Angiosarcomas
  • Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
  • Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
  • Soft Tissue Tumor Case Studies
  • Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments

Their publication record features contributions to key medical journals with frequent publications in:

  • Annals of Surgical Oncology
  • Cancer
  • Cancer Research
  • Annals of Surgery
  • British Journal of Surgery

Chandrajit P. Raut has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Alessandro Gronchi
  • Mark Fairweather
  • Piotr Rutkowski
  • D. Strauß
  • Dario Callegaro

Several notable recent papers authored or coauthored by Raut demonstrate their engagement with significant oncological and surgical research topics. These include:

  • The management of desmoid tumours: A joint global consensus-based guideline approach for adult and paediatric patients, 2020, European Journal of Cancer
  • Preoperative radiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for patients with primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (EORTC-62092: STRASS): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial, 2020, The Lancet Oncology
  • The Angiosarcoma Project: enabling genomic and clinical discoveries in a rare cancer through patient-partnered research, 2020, Nature Medicine
  • Management of Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma (RPS) in the Adult: An Updated Consensus Approach from the Transatlantic Australasian RPS Working Group, 2021, Annals of Surgical Oncology
  • Ultra-rare sarcomas: A consensus paper from the Connective Tissue Oncology Society community of experts on the incidence threshold and the list of entities, 2021, Cancer

Best Publications

  • Cell-of-Origin Patterns Dominate the Molecular Classification of 10,000 Tumors from 33 Types of Cancer.

    Katherine A. Hoadley;Christina Yau;Christina Yau;Toshinori Hinoue;Denise M. Wolf

  • NCCN Task Force report: update on the management of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors

    George D. Demetri;Margaret Von Mehren;Cristina R. Antonescu;Ronald P. DeMatteo

  • Genomic and Functional Approaches to Understanding Cancer Aneuploidy

    Alison M. Taylor;Alison M. Taylor;Juliann Shih;Gavin Ha;Gavin Ha;Galen F. Gao

  • NCCN Task Force report: management of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST)--update of the NCCN clinical practice guidelines.

    George D. Demetri;Robert S. Benjamin;Charles D. Blanke;Jean Yves Blay

  • Comprehensive and Integrated Genomic Characterization of Adult Soft Tissue Sarcomas

    Adam Abeshouse;Clement Adebamowo;Sally N. Adebamowo;Rehan Akbani

  • Impact of resection status on pattern of failure and survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma

    Chandrajit P. Raut;Jennifer F. Tseng;Jennifer F. Tseng;Charlotte C. Sun;Huamin Wang

  • Pancreaticoduodenectomy with vascular resection: margin status and survival duration

    Jennifer F. Tseng;Chandrajit P. Raut;Jeffrey E. Lee;Peter W.T. Pisters

  • Erratum: Comprehensive Characterization of Cancer Driver Genes and Mutations (ARTICLE (2018) 173(2) (371–385), (S009286741830237X), (10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.060))

    Matthew H. Bailey;Collin Tokheim;Eduard Porta-Pardo;Sohini Sengupta

  • Surgical Management of Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors After Treatment With Targeted Systemic Therapy Using Kinase Inhibitors

    Chandrajit P. Raut;Matthew Posner;Jayesh Desai;Jeffrey A. Morgan

  • Variability in Patterns of Recurrence After Resection of Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma (RPS): A Report on 1007 Patients From the Multi-institutional Collaborative RPS Working Group

    Alessandro Gronchi;Dirk C. Strauss;Rosalba Miceli;Sylvie Bonvalot

  • Pan-cancer Alterations of the MYC Oncogene and Its Proximal Network across the Cancer Genome Atlas

    Franz X. Schaub;Varsha Dhankani;Ashton C. Berger;Mihir Trivedi

  • Loss of PTEN Is Associated with Resistance to Anti-PD-1 Checkpoint Blockade Therapy in Metastatic Uterine Leiomyosarcoma.

    Suzanne George;Diana Miao;Diana Miao;George D. Demetri;Dennis Adeegbe

  • Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in patients with presumed pancreatic cancer.

    Chandrajit P. Raut;Ana M. Grau;Gregg A. Staerkel;Madhukar Kaw

  • Preoperative radiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for patients with primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (EORTC-62092: STRASS): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.

    Sylvie Bonvalot;Alessandro Gronchi;Cécile Le Péchoux;Carol J. Swallow

  • The management of desmoid tumours : A joint global consensus-based guideline approach for adult and paediatric patients

    Ben Alman;Steven Attia;Christina Baumgarten;Charlotte Benson

  • Genomic, Pathway Network, and Immunologic Features Distinguishing Squamous Carcinomas

    Joshua D. Campbell;Joshua D. Campbell;Joshua D. Campbell;Christina Yau;Christina Yau;Reanne Bowlby;Yuexin Liu

  • Management of Recurrent Retroperitoneal Sarcoma (RPS) in the Adult: A Consensus Approach from the Trans-Atlantic RPS Working Group

    J Ahlen;N Ahuja;R Antbacka;S Bagaria

  • Technical Considerations in Surgery for Retroperitoneal Sarcomas: Position Paper from E-Surge, a Master Class in Sarcoma Surgery, and EORTC–STBSG

    Syvie Bonvalot;Chandrajit P. Raut;Raphael E. Pollock;Piotr Rutkowski

  • Local Cancer Recurrence: The Realities, Challenges, and Opportunities for New Therapies

    David A. Mahvi;Rong Liu;Mark W. Grinstaff;Yolonda L. Colson

  • Primary angiosarcoma of the breast: clinicopathologic analysis of 49 cases, suggesting that grade is not prognostic.

    Alessandra F. Nascimento;Chandrajit P. Raut;Christopher D. M. Fletcher

Frequent Co-Authors

Alessandro Gronchi
Alessandro Gronchi University of Milan
George D. Demetri
George D. Demetri Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Suzanne George
Suzanne George Harvard University
Piotr Rutkowski
Piotr Rutkowski Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology
Monica M. Bertagnolli
Monica M. Bertagnolli Brigham and Women's Hospital
Jason L. Hornick
Jason L. Hornick Brigham and Women's Hospital
Jonathan A. Fletcher
Jonathan A. Fletcher Brigham and Women's Hospital
Christopher D.M. Fletcher
Christopher D.M. Fletcher Brigham and Women's Hospital
Paolo G. Casali
Paolo G. Casali University of Milan
Peter Hohenberger
Peter Hohenberger Heidelberg University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Aspiring medical professionals have a range of flexible online degree options to support their education and career advancement. For registered nurses looking to grow without traditional on-site requirements, the rn to bsn online with no clinicals programs offer a pathway to earn a BSN fully online, making scheduling easier for working professionals.

Busy nurses seeking advanced practice or leadership roles can benefit from the convenience of accelerated online formats. Those wanting to quickly reach the highest level in nursing may consider a 1 year dnp program online, allowing for significant career advancement in a short time frame.

For students who may not want the intensive research requirements of a traditional doctoral program, online dnp programs without dissertation make the process more accessible while still providing top-tier credentials.

Additionally, if you’re starting out in healthcare, options like a 6 month lpn program offer a fast track into nursing careers. No matter your starting point or goals, these online pathways can help shape your future in medicine.

Best Scientists Citing Chandrajit P. Raut

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles