World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Medicine
Poland
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
109
Citations
79791
World Ranking
5650
National Ranking
5

Piotr Rutkowski publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Piotr Rutkowski sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 713 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Piotr Rutkowski D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Piotr Rutkowski sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 109 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Medicine in Poland Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Medicine in Poland Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in Poland Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Medicine in Poland Leader Award

Overview

Piotr Rutkowski is affiliated with the Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology in Poland. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a notable emphasis on Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Biology, Immunology, and Rheumatology.

The areas of study and scientific topics covered in Rutkowski's work include:

  • Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • CAR-T cell therapy research
  • Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
  • Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment

Rutkowski's publications have appeared in various academic venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Annals of Oncology
  • Oncology in Clinical Practice
  • Cancers
  • European Journal of Cancer

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Rutkowski include:

  • Soft tissue and visceral sarcomas: ESMO-EURACAN-GENTURIS Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up, 2021, Annals of Oncology
  • Overall Survival Benefit with Tebentafusp in Metastatic Uveal Melanoma, 2021, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Atezolizumab, vemurafenib, and cobimetinib as first-line treatment for unresectable advanced BRAFV600 mutation-positive melanoma (IMspire150): primary analysis of the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, 2020, The Lancet
  • Long-Term Outcomes With Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab or Nivolumab Alone Versus Ipilimumab in Patients With Advanced Melanoma, 2022, Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
  • Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: ESMO-EURACAN-GENTURIS Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up, 2021, Annals of Oncology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Rutkowski include:

  • Anna M. Czarnecka
  • Paolo A. Ascierto
  • Anna Szumera-Ciećkiewicz
  • Georgina V. Long
  • Dirk Schadendorf

Best Publications

  • Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Monotherapy in Untreated Melanoma.

    James Larkin;Vanna Chiarion-Sileni;Rene Gonzalez;Jean Jacques Grob

  • Nivolumab in previously untreated melanoma without BRAF mutation.

    Caroline Robert;Georgina V. Long;Benjamin Brady;Caroline Dutriaux

  • Overall Survival with Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma

    Jedd D. Wolchok;Vanna Chiarion-Sileni;Rene Gonzalez;Piotr Rutkowski

  • Five-year survival with combined nivolumab and ipilimumab in advanced melanoma: New England Journal of Medicine

    J. Larkin;V. Chiarion-Sileni;R. Gonzalez;J.-J. Grob

  • Dabrafenib in BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma: a multicentre, open-label, phase 3 randomised controlled trial

    Axel Hauschild;Jean Jacques Grob;Lev V. Demidov;Thomas Jouary

  • Improved Overall Survival in Melanoma with Combined Dabrafenib and Trametinib

    Caroline Robert;Boguslawa Karaszewska;Jacob Schachter;Piotr Rutkowski

  • Improved Survival with MEK Inhibition in BRAF-Mutated Melanoma

    Keith T. Flaherty;Caroline Robert;Peter Hersey;Paul Nathan

  • Adjuvant Nivolumab versus Ipilimumab in Resected Stage III or IV Melanoma

    Jeffrey Weber;Mario Mandala;Michele Del Vecchio;Helen J. Gogas

  • Improved survival with MEK Inhibition in BRAF-mutated melanoma for the METRIC Study Group

    K T Flaherty;C Robert;P Hersey;P Nathan;P Nathan

  • Adjuvant Pembrolizumab versus Placebo in Resected Stage III Melanoma

    Alexander M.M. Eggermont;Christian U. Blank;Mario Mandala;Georgina V. Long

  • Efficacy and safety of regorafenib for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours after failure of imatinib and sunitinib (GRID): an international, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

    George D Demetri;Peter Reichardt;Yoon-Koo Kang;Jean-Yves Blay

  • Soft tissue and visceral sarcomas: ESMO–EURACAN Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up†

    P.G. Casali;N. Abecassis;S. Bauer;R. Biagini

  • Nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab alone versus ipilimumab alone in advanced melanoma (CheckMate 067): 4-year outcomes of a multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial.

    Frank Stephen Hodi;Vanna Chiarion-Sileni;Rene Gonzalez;Jean Jacques Grob

  • Five-Year Outcomes with Dabrafenib plus Trametinib in Metastatic Melanoma.

    Caroline Robert;Jean J Grob;Daniil Stroyakovskiy;Boguslawa Karaszewska

  • Risk of recurrence of gastrointestinal stromal tumour after surgery: an analysis of pooled population-based cohorts

    Heikki Joensuu;Aki Vehtari;Jaakko Riihimäki;Toshirou Nishida

  • Consensus meeting for the management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors Report of the GIST Consensus Conference of 20–21 March 2004, under the auspices of ESMO

    Jean Yves Blay;Sylvie Bonvalot;Paolo Casali;Haesun Choi

  • Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: ESMO-EURACAN Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

    P.G. Casali;N. Abecassis;S. Bauer;R. Biagini

  • Safety and efficacy of denosumab for adults and skeletally mature adolescents with giant cell tumour of bone: interim analysis of an open-label, parallel-group, phase 2 study.

    Sant Chawla;Robert Henshaw;Leanne Seeger;Edwin Choy

  • Atezolizumab, vemurafenib, and cobimetinib as first-line treatment for unresectable advanced BRAFV600 mutation-positive melanoma (IMspire150): primary analysis of the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

    Ralf Gutzmer;Daniil Stroyakovskiy;Helen Gogas;Caroline Robert

  • Overall Survival Benefit with Tebentafusp in Metastatic Uveal Melanoma

    Paul Nathan;Jessica C. Hassel;Piotr Rutkowski;Jean-Francois Baurain

Frequent Co-Authors

Alessandro Gronchi
Alessandro Gronchi University of Milan
Hans Gelderblom
Hans Gelderblom Leiden University Medical Center
Dirk Schadendorf
Dirk Schadendorf University of Duisburg-Essen
Jean-Yves Blay
Jean-Yves Blay Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
Caroline Robert
Caroline Robert University of Paris-Saclay
Paolo G. Casali
Paolo G. Casali University of Milan
Peter Hohenberger
Peter Hohenberger Heidelberg University
Paolo A. Ascierto
Paolo A. Ascierto National Institutes of Health
Chandrajit P. Raut
Chandrajit P. Raut Brigham and Women's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Medicine opens the door to numerous healthcare pathways—including flexible options through online degrees. With increasing demand for skilled nurses and healthcare professionals, online programs offer an accessible route to advance your education while balancing work or family commitments.

Many students look for the cheapest np school online to become a Nurse Practitioner, allowing them to gain advanced clinical skills with minimal financial burden. Similarly, understanding how much is online nursing school can help future nurses budget wisely for their education.

Professionals aiming for leadership or academic roles might consider reputable online nursing doctoral programs that accommodate busy schedules without sacrificing quality. For registered nurses seeking career advancement, affordable rn to bsn programs provide a streamlined and cost-effective way to earn a bachelor’s degree.

Online healthcare degrees create diverse career options, from clinical roles to administration. Carefully research program costs, accreditation, and flexibility to find the right fit for your goals.

Best Scientists Citing Piotr Rutkowski

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles