World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
51
Citations
6148
World Ranking
3320
National Ranking
224

C. Prodehl publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where C. Prodehl sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 603+

This scientist: 152 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

C. Prodehl D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where C. Prodehl sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

Overview

C. Prodehl is affiliated with the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on Earth and Planetary Sciences, with an emphasis on the subfields of Geophysics and Geochemistry and Petrology. This interdisciplinary approach reflects in their work related to seismic and geological processes.

Their recent publications include the paper titled Data from the 1978-79 Rhenish Massif seismic refraction experiment published in 2020 in the venue GFZ Data Services.

C. Prodehl collaborates frequently with several researchers, including:

  • J. Mechie
  • W. Kaminski
  • Karl Fuchs

Their work covers various topics within geosciences, particularly focused on:

  • Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
  • Geological Modeling and Analysis
  • Seismic Waves and Analysis

The scientist also publishes primarily in venues such as GFZ Data Services, contributing to the dissemination of geoscientific data and findings.

Best Publications

  • LISPB — IV. Crustal structure of Northern Britain

    D. Bamford;K. Nunn;C. Prodehl;B. Jacob

  • A seismic study of the crust and upper mantle of the Jordan-Dead Sea Rift and their transition toward the Mediterranean Sea

    Avihu Ginzburg;Jannis Makris;Karl Fuchs;Claus Prodehl

  • Deep structure of the southern Rhinegraben area from seismic refraction investigations

    J.B. Edel;K. Fuchs;C. Gelbke;C. Prodehl

  • An interpretation of wide-angle compressional and shear wave data in southwest Germany: Poisson's ratio and petrological implications

    W. Steven Holbrook;Dirk Gajewski;Anton Krammer;Claus Prodehl

  • Seismic-refraction studies of the Afro-Arabian rift system — a brief review

    C. Prodehl;K. Fuchs;J. Mechie

  • VRANCEA99—the crustal structure beneath the southeastern Carpathians and the Moesian Platform from a seismic refraction profile in Romania

    F. Hauser;V. Raileanu;W. Fielitz;A. Bala

  • A Lithospheric Seismic Profile in Britain—I Preliminary Results*

    D. Bamford;S. Faber;B. Jacob;W. Kaminski

  • A model for the structure, composition and evolution of the Kenya rift

    J. Mechie;G.R. Keller;C. Prodehl;M.A. Khan

  • Crustal structure of the Fennoscandian Shield: A traveltime interpretation of the long-range FENNOLORA seismic refraction profile

    B. Guggisberg;W. Kaminski;C. Prodehl

  • Structure and evolution of the lithosphere beneath the rocky mountains: Initial results from the CD-ROM experiment

    K. E. Karlstrom;S. A. Bowring;K. R. Chamberlain;K. G. Dueker

  • Crustal structure of the Western United States

    Unknown

  • Crustal structure along the Central Segment of the EGT from seismic-refraction studies

    B Aichroth;C Prodehl;H Thybo

  • A crustal structure study of Jordan derived from seismic refraction data

    Unknown

  • Large-scale variation in lithospheric structure along and across the Kenya rift

    C. Prodehl;J. Mechie;W. Kaminski;K. Fuchs

  • Seismic crustal structure between the Transylvanian Basin and the Black Sea, Romania

    F. Hauser;V. Raileanu;W. Fielitz;C. Dinu

  • Fault systems of the 1971 San Fernando and 1994 Northridge earthquakes, southern California: Relocated aftershocks and seismic images from LARSE II

    Gary S. Fuis;Robert W. Clayton;Paul M. Davis;Trond Ryberg

  • Crustal structure beneath the Kenya Rift from axial profile data

    J. Mechie;Gordon R. Keller;C. Prodehl;S. Gaciri

  • The Yellowstone-Snake River Plain Seismic Profiling Experiment: Crustal structure of the Eastern Snake River Plain

    L. W. Braile;R. B. Smith;J. Ansorge;M. R. Baker

  • Detailed structure of the crust and upper mantle along the Jordan‐Dead Sea Rift

    Avihu Ginzburg;Jannis Makris;Karl Fuchs;Bertram Perathoner

  • LISPB–III. Upper crustal structure of northern Britain

    Unknown

  • The structure of the crust and upper mantle in the Dead Sea rift

    Avihu Ginzburg;Jannis Makris;Karl Fuchs;Claus Prodehl

  • The Long-Range Seismic Refraction Experiment in the Rhenish Massif

    J. Mechie;C. Prodehl;K. Fuchs

  • Crustal evolution of the Rhinegraben area. 1. Exploring the lower crust in the Rhinegraben rift by unified geophysical experiments

    K. Fuchs;K.-P. Bonjer;D. Gajewski;E. Lüschen

  • Seismic refraction investigation of the Black Forest

    D. Gajewski;C. Prodehl

Frequent Co-Authors

Karl Fuchs
Karl Fuchs Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Walter D. Mooney
Walter D. Mooney United States Geological Survey
Hans Thybo
Hans Thybo Istanbul Technical University
James Mechie
James Mechie University of Potsdam
Dirk Gajewski
Dirk Gajewski Universität Hamburg
Lawrence W. Braile
Lawrence W. Braile Purdue University West Lafayette
Paul M. Davis
Paul M. Davis University of California, Los Angeles
George A. Thompson
George A. Thompson Stanford University
Patrick M. Shannon
Patrick M. Shannon University College Dublin
Marc Tittgemeyer
Marc Tittgemeyer Max Planck Society

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science often opens doors to diverse career paths that blend science with other disciplines. For students interested in expanding their skills, pursuing related online degrees can be a strategic choice. For example, combining Earth Science with language skills can enhance communication in global environmental projects, making programs like spanish degrees online a valuable option.

Veterans looking for flexible education options may find programs tailored to their needs. The veteran friendly online spanish degree is one such program that balances quality education with the unique circumstances of veterans, supporting their transition to civilian careers in Earth Science fields.

Some students might also consider creative arts to complement their scientific expertise. For these learners, online mfa programs offer affordable options to develop skills that benefit environmental communication and education roles.

Finally, management skills are invaluable in Earth Science careers that involve leading teams or projects. Earning a degree like the best online human resource management masters degree can prepare graduates for leadership positions in environmental organizations and research institutions.

Best Scientists Citing C. Prodehl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles