What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Plate tectonics
- Optics
- Seismology
His primary areas of investigation include Seismology, Crust, East European Craton, Lithosphere and Mantle.
His Seismology research incorporates themes from Massif and Trough.
His Crust research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Mohorovičić discontinuity, Craton and Terrane.
His work deals with themes such as Paleozoic, Precambrian, Rift and Suture, which intersect with East European Craton.
His Lithosphere study is focused on Tectonics in general.
In Mantle, Marek Grad works on issues like Transition zone, which are connected to Mineralogy, Geomorphology, Shear zone and Earth's internal heat budget.
His most cited work include:
- The Moho depth map of the European Plate (269 citations)
- Complex lithospheric structure under the central Baltic Shield from surface wave tomography (154 citations)
- Deep structure of the Earth's crust in the contact zone of the Palaeozoic and Precambrian Platforms in Poland (Tornquist-Teisseyre zone) (142 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Marek Grad mostly deals with Seismology, Crust, Lithosphere, East European Craton and Mantle.
His Seismology research includes themes of Precambrian and Transition zone.
His research integrates issues of Craton, Oceanic crust and Terrane in his study of Crust.
He works mostly in the field of Lithosphere, limiting it down to concerns involving Subduction and, occasionally, Trough.
The various areas that Marek Grad examines in his East European Craton study include Seismic tomography, Massif, Suture and Paleozoic.
His Mantle study incorporates themes from Sedimentary rock and Receiver function.
He most often published in these fields:
- Seismology (64.77%)
- Crust (48.70%)
- Lithosphere (39.38%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2012-2020)?
- Seismology (64.77%)
- East European Craton (29.02%)
- Crust (48.70%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Seismology, East European Craton, Crust, Lithosphere and Tectonics are his primary areas of study.
His work on Structural geology, Passive seismic, Seismic refraction and Seismic array as part of general Seismology research is frequently linked to Ambient noise level, thereby connecting diverse disciplines of science.
His research integrates issues of Precambrian, Archaeology and Geomorphology in his study of East European Craton.
His research in Crust focuses on subjects like Basement, which are connected to Submarine pipeline and Lithology.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Craton and Mantle.
His study in the field of Terrane and Suture is also linked to topics like Baltica.
Between 2012 and 2020, his most popular works were:
- Transcurrent nature of the Teisseyre–Tornquist Zone in Central Europe: results of the POLCRUST-01 deep reflection seismic profile (45 citations)
- Deep seismic reflection profile in Central Europe reveals complex pattern of Paleozoic and Alpine accretion at the East European Craton margin (41 citations)
- Seismic velocity model of the crust and upper mantle along profile PANCAKE across the Carpathians between the Pannonian Basin and the East European Craton (33 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Plate tectonics
- Optics
- Oceanography
Marek Grad focuses on Crust, Seismology, Tectonics, East European Craton and Lithosphere.
His Crust research includes themes of Peninsula, Craton, Mantle and Basement.
His Seismology study combines topics in areas such as Precambrian and Interferometry.
His Tectonics research incorporates themes from Seismic wave and Vertical seismic profile.
His East European Craton study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Sedimentary rock, Massif and Structural geology.
His research investigates the connection with Lithosphere and areas like Oceanic crust which intersect with concerns in Magmatism, Ultramafic rock, Laurentia, Olivine and Eclogite.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
