World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
76
Citations
22141
World Ranking
500
National Ranking
238

Jonathan E. Fielding publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan E. Fielding sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 298 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Jonathan E. Fielding D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan E. Fielding sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1995 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)

Overview

Jonathan E. Fielding is affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles in the United States. Their research work spans multiple domains within health professions and economics, econometrics, and finance, with a particular focus on public health policy, healthcare systems, and economic evaluations.

Their most recent papers include:

  • Permanent Supportive Housing With Housing First to Reduce Homelessness and Promote Health Among Homeless Populations With Disability: A Community Guide Systematic Review, 2020, Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
  • False Positive Results With SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR Tests and How to Evaluate a RT-PCR-Positive Test for the Possibility of a False Positive Result, 2021, Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
  • Keeping governments accountable: the COVID-19 Assessment Scorecard (COVID-SCORE), 2020, Nature Medicine
  • Excess Medical Care Spending: The Categories, Magnitude, and Opportunity Costs of Wasteful Spending in the United States, 2020, American Journal of Public Health
  • Reduction in US Health Care Spending Required to Meet the Institute of Medicine's 2030 Target, 2020, American Journal of Public Health

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Fielding include:

  • Lawrence W. Green
  • Ross C. Brownson
  • Jeffrey V. Lazarus
  • Ayman El-Mohandes
  • Scott C. Ratzan

Fielding's publication record shows a concentration in several prominent venues, including:

  • American Journal of Public Health
  • Annual Review of Public Health
  • UNC Libraries
  • Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
  • Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

The main fields of study covered by their work are:

  • Health Professions
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Subfields of their research include:

  • General Health Professions
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Modeling and Simulation
  • Finance

Major topics addressed in Fielding's research are:

  • Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Healthcare cost, quality, practices
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Public Health Policies and Education
  • Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism

Fielding was recognized as a member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) in 1995.

Best Publications

  • Evidence-Based Public Health: A Fundamental Concept for Public Health Practice

    Ross C. Brownson;Jonathan E. Fielding;Christopher M. Maylahn

  • Culturally competent healthcare systems: A systematic review

    Laurie M Anderson;Susan C Scrimshaw;Mindy T Fullilove;Jonathan E Fielding

  • Health disparities and health equity: the issue is justice

    Paula Braveman;Shiriki K Kumanyika;Jonathan E. Fielding;Thomas A. LaVeist

  • The effectiveness of early childhood development programs. A systematic review.

    Laurie M Anderson;Carolynne Shinn;Mindy T Fullilove;Susan C Scrimshaw

  • Developing an Evidence-Based Guide to Community Preventive Services—Methods

    Peter A Briss;Stephanie Zaza;Marguerite Pappaioanou;Jonathan Fielding

  • The effectiveness of limiting alcohol outlet density as a means of reducing excessive alcohol consumption and alcohol-related harms.

    Carla Alexia Campbell;Robert A. Hahn;Randy Elder;Robert Brewer

  • Smoking: Health Effects and Control

    Jonathan E. Fielding

  • The Effectiveness of Tax Policy Interventions for Reducing Excessive Alcohol Consumption and Related Harms

    Randy W. Elder;Bruce A. Lawrence;Aneeqah Ferguson;Timothy S. Naimi

  • Addressing Social Determinants of Health and Health Inequalities.

    Nancy E. Adler;M. Maria Glymour;Jonathan Fielding

  • Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to reduce tobacco use and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke.

    David P Hopkins;Peter A Briss;Connie J Ricard;Corinne G Husten

  • Building Capacity for Evidence-Based Public Health: Reconciling the Pulls of Practice and the Push of Research

    Ross C. Brownson;Jonathan E. Fielding;Lawrence W. Green

  • Addressing Social Determinants of Health and Health Disparities: A Vital Direction for Health and Health Care

    Nancy E. Adler;David M. Cutler;Jonathan E. Fielding

  • Building Community Disaster Resilience: Perspectives From a Large Urban County Department of Public Health.

    Alonzo L. Plough;Jonathan E. Fielding;Anita Chandra;Malcolm V. Williams

  • Attrition in prevention research.

    William B. Hansen;Linda M. Collins;C. Kevin Malotte;C. Anderson Johnson

  • Population-based interventions engaging communities of color in healthy eating and active living: a review.

    Antronette K Yancey;Shiriki K Kumanyika;Ninez A Ponce;William J McCarthy

  • Healthy People A 2020 Vision for the Social Determinants Approach

    Howard K. Koh;Julie J. Piotrowski;Shiriki Kumanyika;Jonathan E. Fielding

  • School-Based Health Centers to Advance Health Equity: A Community Guide Systematic Review

    John A. Knopf;Ramona K.C. Finnie;Yinan Peng;Robert A. Hahn

  • Providing affordable family housing and reducing residential segregation by income. A systematic review.

    Laurie M Anderson;Joseph St. Charles;Mindy T Fullilove;Susan C Scrimshaw

  • Health effects of involuntary smoking.

    Jonathan E. Fielding;Kenneth J. Phenow

  • Frequency of worksite health promotion activities.

    J E Fielding;P V Piserchia

  • Health promotion and disease prevention at the worksite.

    Jonathan E. Fielding

Frequent Co-Authors

Ross C. Brownson
Ross C. Brownson Washington University in St. Louis
Lawrence W. Green
Lawrence W. Green University of California, San Francisco
Antronette K. Yancey
Antronette K. Yancey University of California, Los Angeles
Steven M. Asch
Steven M. Asch Stanford University
William J. McCarthy
William J. McCarthy University of California, Los Angeles
Traci L. Toomey
Traci L. Toomey University of Minnesota
Shiriki K. Kumanyika
Shiriki K. Kumanyika Drexel University
Frederick J. Zimmerman
Frederick J. Zimmerman University of California, Los Angeles
Mark A. Schuster
Mark A. Schuster Kaiser Permanente

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online Social Sciences and Humanities degrees in the USA offers flexible options for students at different stages of their careers. Many universities now offer affordable programs, making advanced study more accessible than ever. For those interested in social work, you can find some of the cheapest msw programs available online, combining cost savings with quality education.

In addition to traditional social work degrees, students can pursue bcba certification programs to become Board Certified Behavior Analysts, a highly in-demand credential in educational and clinical settings. If speed is a priority, consider enrolling in a masters in social work online through schools offering accelerated pathways.

For psychology-focused careers, options exist for those seeking the fastest online psychology degree, allowing graduates to enter the workforce quickly or move on to further studies. By choosing the right online program, you can align your education with your professional ambitions and set a strong foundation for your career.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan E. Fielding

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles