World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
49
Citations
16869
World Ranking
5549
National Ranking
3030

Derek M. Isaacowitz publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Derek M. Isaacowitz sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 165 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Derek M. Isaacowitz D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Derek M. Isaacowitz sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2008 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Derek M. Isaacowitz is affiliated with Northeastern University in the United States and conducts research primarily in the field of psychology. Their work focuses on aging and related psychological processes, contributing extensively across multiple subfields such as neuropsychology and physiological psychology, social psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, health, and cognitive neuroscience.

Their research addresses a variety of topics, including:

  • Aging and gerontology research
  • Psychological well-being and life satisfaction
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Global health workforce issues
  • Public health policies and education
  • Healthcare policy and management
  • Mental health research topics

Derek M. Isaacowitz has published in several prominent academic venues, notably:

  • Innovation in Aging
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B
  • Aging & Mental Health
  • Emotion
  • Current Opinion in Psychology

The scientist's recent papers demonstrate their focus on aging and emotion regulation, including:

  • What Do We Know About Aging and Emotion Regulation? (2022), published in Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • Age-Related Changes in the Role of Social Motivation: Implications for Healthy Aging (2021), published in The Journals of Gerontology Series B
  • Aging and emotion regulation during the COVID-19 pandemic (2021), published in Aging & Mental Health
  • Motivation and Healthy Aging: A Heuristic Model (2021), published in The Journals of Gerontology Series B
  • Age differences in emotion regulation strategy use and flexibility in daily life (2023), published in Aging & Mental Health

Frequent co-authors in Derek M. Isaacowitz's research include:

  • Hannah Wolfe
  • Suzanne Meeks
  • Steven M. Albert
  • Rozalyn M. Anderson
  • Judith L. Howe

Recognized within their professional community, Derek M. Isaacowitz was awarded the status of Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2008.

Best Publications

  • Taking Time Seriously. A Theory of Socioemotional Selectivity

    Laura L. Carstensen;Derek M. Isaacowitz;Susan T. Charles

  • Selective preference in visual fixation away from negative images in old age? An eye-tracking study.

    Derek M. Isaacowitz;Heather A. Wadlinger;Deborah Goren;Hugh R. Wilson

  • Fixing Our Focus: Training Attention to Regulate Emotion:

    Heather A. Wadlinger;Derek M. Isaacowitz

  • Positive mood broadens visual attention to positive stimuli

    Heather A. Wadlinger;Derek M. Isaacowitz

  • Mechanisms of motivation-cognition interaction: Challenges and opportunities

    Todd S. Braver;Marie K. Krug;Kimberly S. Chiew;Wouter Kool

  • Age differences in recognition of emotion in lexical stimuli and facial expressions.

    Derek M. Isaacowitz;Corinna E. Löckenhoff;Richard D. Lane;Ron Wright

  • Preferences for emotional information in older and younger adults: A meta-analysis of memory and attention tasks.

    Nora A. Murphy;Derek M. Isaacowitz

  • Pupillometry as a measure of cognitive effort in younger and older adults.

    Tepring Piquado;Derek Isaacowitz;Arthur Wingfield

  • Is there an age-related positivity effect in visual attention? A comparison of two methodologies.

    Derek M. Isaacowitz;Heather A. Wadlinger;Deborah Goren;Hugh R. Wilson

  • Looking While Unhappy Mood-Congruent Gaze in Young Adults, Positive Gaze in Older Adults

    Derek M. Isaacowitz;Kaitlin Toner;Deborah Goren;Hugh R. Wilson

  • The Gaze of the Optimist

    Derek M. Isaacowitz

  • Linking Process and Outcome in the Study of Emotion and Aging.

    Derek M. Isaacowitz;Fredda Blanchard-Fields

  • Looking Happy: The Experimental Manipulation of a Positive Visual Attention Bias

    Heather A. Wadlinger;Derek M. Isaacowitz

  • Use of gaze for real-time mood regulation: effects of age and attentional functioning.

    Derek M. Isaacowitz;Kaitlin Toner;Shevaun D. Neupert

  • Motivated Gaze: The View From the Gazer

    Derek M. Isaacowitz

  • Positive and Negative Affect in Very Old Age

    Derek M. Isaacowitz;Jacqui Smith

  • Bringing an Ecological Perspective to the Study of Aging and Recognition of Emotional Facial Expressions: Past, Current, and Future Methods.

    Derek M. Isaacowitz;Jennifer Tehan Stanley

  • The Time Course of Age-Related Preferences Toward Positive and Negative Stimuli

    Derek M. Isaacowitz;Eric S. Allard;Nora A. Murphy;Mark Schlangel

  • A consensus-based transparency checklist

    Balazs Aczel;Barnabas Szaszi;Alexandra Sarafoglou;Zoltan Kekecs

  • Strengths and satisfaction across the adult lifespan.

    Derek M. Isaacowitz;George E. Vaillant;Martin E. P. Seligman

  • Correlates of well-being in adulthood and old age: A tale of two optimisms

    Derek M. Isaacowitz

Frequent Co-Authors

Helene H. Fung
Helene H. Fung Chinese University of Hong Kong
Alexandra M. Freund
Alexandra M. Freund University of Zurich
Hugh R. Wilson
Hugh R. Wilson York University
Scott O. Lilienfeld
Scott O. Lilienfeld Emory University
David DeSteno
David DeSteno Northeastern University
Laura L. Carstensen
Laura L. Carstensen Stanford University
Daniel J. Simons
Daniel J. Simons University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
M. Gareth Gaskell
M. Gareth Gaskell University of York
Dolores Albarracín
Dolores Albarracín University of Pennsylvania
Martin E. P. Seligman
Martin E. P. Seligman University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering studying Psychology in the USA, it’s worth exploring related fields and online degree options. Social work is a closely aligned career pathway that offers rewarding roles in counseling, community services, and mental health support. Many students choose to pursue a social work degree because the skills and knowledge gained often overlap with psychology.

Affordability is a key concern for many students. Fortunately, there are several options for the cheapest social work degrees in Michigan and cheapest social work degrees in New York City. For those interested in alternative locations, consider these affordable social work degrees in Minneapolis or look into affordable social work programs in Mississippi as well.

By researching these options, you can discover programs that fit your budget and career goals, whether you choose to study psychology directly or pursue a closely related profession like social work.

Best Scientists Citing Derek M. Isaacowitz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles