World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
40
Citations
14928
World Ranking
8040
National Ranking
4301

David DeSteno publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David DeSteno sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 71 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

David DeSteno D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David DeSteno sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

David DeSteno is affiliated with Northeastern University in the United States. Their research spans several subfields including social psychology, psychiatry and mental health, family practice, public health, environmental and occupational health, and clinical psychology. The focus of their work is reflected in a range of topics such as empathy and medical education, clinical reasoning and diagnostic skills, innovations in medical education, mindfulness and compassion interventions, religion, spirituality, and psychology, emotions and moral behavior, and psychological well-being and life satisfaction.

DeSteno has contributed to multiple recent papers, which include a diverse set of themes and publication venues:

  • What is clinical empathy? Perspectives of community members, university students, cancer patients, and physicians (2020) in Patient Education and Counseling
  • Gratitude reduces consumption of depleting resources. (2020) in Emotion
  • Intertemporal empathy decline: Feeling less distress for future others' suffering. (2024) in Emotion
  • Guilt underlies compassion among those who have suffered adversity. (2022) in Emotion
  • Gratitude and sustainability (2020) in Arabixiv (OSF Preprints)

Their work is published frequently in prominent venues, with multiple papers appearing in the journal Emotion. Other publication venues include Patient Education and Counseling, Arabixiv (OSF Preprints), Character Lab Tips, and Motivation and Emotion.

DeSteno collaborates with various researchers in their field. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Shanyu Kates
  • Judith A. Hall
  • Rachel Schwartz
  • Fred Duong
  • Yuan Niu

Best Publications

  • Gratitude and Prosocial Behavior: Helping When It Costs You

    Monica Y. Bartlett;David DeSteno

  • Manipulations of Emotional Context Shape Moral Judgment

    Piercarlo Valdesolo;David DeSteno

  • Pride and perseverance: the motivational role of pride.

    Lisa A. Williams;David DeSteno

  • Synchrony and the social tuning of compassion.

    Piercarlo Valdesolo;David DeSteno

  • The rhythm of joint action: Synchrony promotes cooperative ability

    Piercarlo Valdesolo;Jennifer Ouyang;David DeSteno

  • Beyond valence in the perception of likelihood: the role of emotion specificity.

    David DeSteno;Richard E. Petty;Duane T. Wegener;Derek D. Rucker

  • Meditation Increases Compassionate Responses to Suffering

    Paul Condon;Gaëlle Desbordes;Willa B. Miller;David DeSteno

  • Discrete Emotions and Persuasion: The Role of Emotion-Induced Expectancies

    David DeSteno;Richard E. Petty;Derek D. Rucker;Duane T. Wegener

  • Affective science and health: the importance of emotion and emotion regulation.

    David DeSteno;James J. Gross;Laura Kubzansky

  • Evolutionary Origins of Sex Differences in Jealousy? Questioning the “Fitness” of the Model:

    David A. DeSteno;Peter Salovey

  • Gratitude as moral sentiment: emotion-guided cooperation in economic exchange.

    David DeSteno;Monica Y. Bartlett;Jolie Baumann;Lisa A. Williams

  • Prejudice From Thin Air The Effect of Emotion on Automatic Intergroup Attitudes

    David DeSteno;Nilanjana Dasgupta;Monica Y. Bartlett;Aida Cajdric

  • Sex differences in jealousy: evolutionary mechanism or artifact of measurement?

    David DeSteno;Monica Y. Bartlett;Julia Braverman;Peter Salovey

  • Individual talker differences in voice-onset-time.

    J. Sean Allen;Joanne L. Miller;David DeSteno

  • Moral Hypocrisy: Social Groups and the Flexibility of Virtue

    Piercarlo Valdesolo;David DeSteno

  • Suffering and compassion: The links among adverse life experiences, empathy, compassion, and prosocial behavior.

    Daniel Lim;David DeSteno

  • Fanning the flames of prejudice: The influence of specific incidental emotions on implicit prejudice.

    Nilanjana Dasgupta;David DeSteno;Lisa A. Williams;Matthew Hunsinger

  • Gratitude: Prompting behaviours that build relationships

    Monica Y. Bartlett;Paul Condon;Jourdan Cruz;Jolie Baumann

  • Jealousy and the threatened self: getting to the heart of the green-eyed monster.

    David DeSteno;Piercarlo Valdesolo;Monica Y. Bartlett

  • Mindfulness and Compassion: An Examination of Mechanism and Scalability

    Daniel Lim;Paul Condon;David DeSteno

  • The duality of virtue: Deconstructing the moral hypocrite.

    Piercarlo Valdesolo;David DeSteno

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Salovey
Peter Salovey Yale University
Joanne L. Miller
Joanne L. Miller Northeastern University
Richard E. Petty
Richard E. Petty The Ohio State University
Paul L. Harris
Paul L. Harris Harvard University
Duane T. Wegener
Duane T. Wegener The Ohio State University
Derek D. Rucker
Derek D. Rucker Northwestern University
Derek M. Isaacowitz
Derek M. Isaacowitz Northeastern University
Judith A. Hall
Judith A. Hall Northeastern University
Nilanjana Dasgupta
Nilanjana Dasgupta University of Massachusetts Amherst

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study psychology in the USA opens the door to a variety of related online degrees and rewarding career pathways. Many students consider specialized counseling programs, which offer focused training in mental health, school, marriage and family, or substance abuse counseling.

Exploring the top counseling degree programs in Washington can give insight into state-specific opportunities and licensure requirements. Similarly, those interested in the capital’s vibrant healthcare scene may want to review Washington, D.C. counseling degree programs for potential urban career connections.

If location flexibility is important, the best college counseling programs in the West highlight top regional choices, some of which offer robust online or hybrid learning formats.

Students searching for high-quality Midwest programs can explore the best counseling program rankings in Wisconsin, giving perspective on affordable or accredited options.

Whether your interest lies in clinical settings, school environments, or private practice, these pathways provide the academic foundation and credentials to succeed in the growing field of psychology and counseling.

Best Scientists Citing David DeSteno

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles