World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
38
Citations
6836
World Ranking
5904
National Ranking
2812

Joanne L. Miller publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joanne L. Miller sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 100 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Joanne L. Miller D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joanne L. Miller sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joanne L. Miller is affiliated with Northeastern University in the United States. Their recent research outputs span topics relevant to acoustics and political science as reflected in their publications from 2021 and 2022.

Among their recent papers, the following stand out:

  • ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA Silver Medal in Speech Communication 2021: Joanne L. Miller (2021) published in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
  • XPS volume 9 issue 2 Cover and Back matter (2022) published in Journal of Experimental Political Science

The diverse venues reflect a multidisciplinary engagement, with publications appearing in:

  • The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
  • Journal of Experimental Political Science

Joanne L. Miller has collaborated with several other researchers, including:

  • Philip Moniz
  • Brendan Apfeld
  • Emanuel Coman
  • John Gerring
  • Stephen Jessee

The scientist's research touches on subjects within acoustics and political science, highlighting an interdisciplinary approach that engages different scholarly communities. Their coauthorship with investigators active in political science further suggests a cross-domain scholarly network.

In academic publishing, the range and nature of venues provide an insight into their areas of specialization and intellectual interests. The representation in a specialized acoustics journal alongside a political science journal illustrates a blending of methodologies or thematic interests across these fields.

Best Publications

  • Some effects of later-occurring information on the perception of stop consonant and semivowel

    Joanne L. Miller;Alvin M. Liberman

  • Individual talker differences in voice-onset-time.

    J. Sean Allen;Joanne L. Miller;David DeSteno

  • Articulation Rate and Its Variability in Spontaneous Speech: A Reanalysis and Some Implications

    Joanne L. Miller;François Grosjean;Concetta Lomanto

  • Effect of speaking rate on the perceptual structure of a phonetic category

    Joanne L. Miller;Lydia E. Volaitis

  • Phonetic prototypes: Influence of place of articulation and speaking rate on the internal structure of voicing categories

    Lydia E. Volaitis;Joanne L. Miller

  • Speaking Rate and Segments: A Look at the Relation between Speech Production and Speech Perception for the Voicing Contrast

    J.L. Miller;K.P. Green;A. Reeves

  • Contextual effects in infant speech perception

    Peter D. Eimas;Joanne L. Miller

  • Perspectives on the study of speech

    Peter D. Eimas;Joanne L. Miller

  • Going in and out of Languages: An Example of Bilingual Flexibility:

    Francois Grosjean;Joanne L. Miller

  • Listener sensitivity to individual talker differences in voice-onset-time.

    J. Sean Allen;Joanne L. Miller

  • On the internal structure of phonetic categories: a progress report.

    Joanne L. Miller

  • Speech, language, and communication

    Joanne L. Miller;Peter D. Eimas

  • Individual talker differences in voice-onset-time: contextual influences.

    Rachel M. Theodore;Joanne L. Miller;David DeSteno

  • Studies on the categorization of speech by infants.

    Joanne L. Miller;Peter D. Eimas

  • Some effects of speaking rate on the production of /b/ and /w/

    Joanne L. Miller;Thomas Baer

  • Effects of speaking rate and lexical status on phonetic perception.

    Joanne L. Miller;Emily R. Dexter

  • On the role of visual rate information in phonetic perception

    Kerry P. Green;Joanne L. Miller

  • Effects of syllable-initial voicing and speaking rate on the temporal characteristics of monosyllabic words

    J. Sean Allen;Joanne L. Miller

  • Discrimination of information for manner of articulation

    Peter D. Eimas;Joanne L. Miller

  • Internal structure of voicing categories in early infancy

    Joanne L. Miller;Peter D. Eimas

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter D. Eimas
Peter D. Eimas Brown University
François Grosjean
François Grosjean University of Neuchâtel
David DeSteno
David DeSteno Northeastern University
Peter W. Jusczyk
Peter W. Jusczyk Johns Hopkins University
Alvin M. Liberman
Alvin M. Liberman Haskins Laboratories
Barbara L. Davis
Barbara L. Davis The University of Texas at Austin
Carol Stoel-Gammon
Carol Stoel-Gammon University of Washington
Robert J. Zatorre
Robert J. Zatorre McGill University
Nancy J. Keuthen
Nancy J. Keuthen Harvard University
Peter F. MacNeilage
Peter F. MacNeilage The University of Texas at Austin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities online opens up a wide range of degree options and flexible career pathways. Popular choices include psychology, social work, marriage and family therapy, and counseling. These areas cater to students passionate about understanding people and helping communities.

Many students begin with a psychology online degree, which provides a strong foundation in human behavior and research methods. For those interested in clinical work or therapy roles, earning a Master of Social Work (MSW) is a practical next step. Some of the msw programs are offered online, making it easier for students to continue working while studying.

To advance further in mental health professions, students might consider doctorate-level options like the cheapest psyd programs. These equip learners with specialized clinical training and boost employability. If your focus is on relationship and family dynamics, the mft degree can lead to a rewarding career as a Marriage and Family Therapist.

With increasing demand for mental health and social services, these career paths offer diverse opportunities and growth, all accessible through accredited online programs in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Joanne L. Miller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles