World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
57
Citations
10434
World Ranking
4069
National Ranking
2278

Nancy J. Keuthen publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nancy J. Keuthen sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 159 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Nancy J. Keuthen D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nancy J. Keuthen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nancy J. Keuthen is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on psychological and neuroscientific aspects of obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders and related areas.

Their body of work encompasses several key topics, including:

  • Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders

Keuthen's publications cover a variety of subfields such as clinical psychology, cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry and mental health, developmental and educational psychology, and dermatology. The majority of their scholarly output lies within clinical psychology.

They have been frequently published in certain venues, which include:

  • Journal of Psychiatric Research
  • Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders
  • Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy
  • Brain Imaging and Behavior
  • Child Psychiatry & Human Development

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Keuthen consist of:

  • Identifying subtypes of trichotillomania (hair pulling disorder) and excoriation (skin picking) disorder using mixture modeling in a multicenter sample, 2020, Journal of Psychiatric Research
  • The Generic BFRB Scale-8 (GBS-8): a transdiagnostic scale to measure the severity of body-focused repetitive behaviours, 2022, Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy
  • Reward processing in trichotillomania and skin picking disorder, 2021, Brain Imaging and Behavior
  • Clinical Characteristics of Youth with Trichotillomania (Hair-Pulling Disorder) and Excoriation (Skin-Picking) Disorder, 2022, Child Psychiatry & Human Development
  • Prevalence and Correlates of Hair Pulling Disorder and Skin Picking Disorder in an Acute Psychiatric Sample, 2023, The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease

Their research collaborations include frequent co-authors such as:

  • Jon E. Grant
  • Darin D. Dougherty
  • John Piacentini
  • Tara S. Peris
  • Emily J. Ricketts

The main fields of study within their research profile cover psychology, neuroscience, and medicine, with the largest emphasis on psychology. Their work integrates psychological theories and clinical applications related to body-focused repetitive behaviors and related psychiatric conditions.

Best Publications

  • Organizational strategies mediate nonverbal memory impairment in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Cary R Savage;Lee Baer;Nancy J Keuthen;Halle D Brown

  • The Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Hairpulling Scale: 1. Development and Factor Analyses

    Nancy J. Keuthen;Richard L. O’Sullivan;Joseph N. Ricciardi;David Shera

  • Cerebral structural abnormalities in obsessive-compulsive disorder. A quantitative morphometric magnetic resonance imaging study.

    Michael A. Jenike;Hans C. Breiter;Lee Baer;David N. Kennedy

  • Self-Injurious Skin Picking: Clinical Characteristics and Comorbidity

    Sabine Wilhelm;Nancy J. Keuthen;Thilo Deckersbach;Iris M. Engelhard

  • The Trichotillomania Impact Project (TIP): exploring phenomenology, functional impairment, and treatment utilization.

    Douglas W Woods;Christopher A Flessner;Martin E Franklin;Nancy J Keuthen

  • Trichotillomania (hair pulling disorder), skin picking disorder, and stereotypic movement disorder: toward DSM-V

    Dan J. Stein;E M D J D Jon Grant;Martin E. Franklin;Nancy Keuthen

  • The Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Hairpulling Scale: 2. Reliability and Validity

    R L O'Sullivan;N J Keuthen;C F Hayday;J N Ricciardi

  • REPETITIVE SKIN PICKING IN A STUDENT POPULATION AND COMPARISON WITH A SAMPLE OF SELF-INJURIOUS SKIN-PICKERS

    Nancy J. Keuthen;Thilo Deckersbach;Sabine Wilhelm;Edward Hale

  • Prevalence of Symptoms of Body Dysmorphic Disorder and Its Correlates: A Cross-Cultural Comparison

    Antje Bohne;Nancy J. Keuthen;Sabine Wilhelm;Thilo Deckersbach

  • Skin Picking Disorder

    Jon E. Grant;Brian L. Odlaug;Samuel R. Chamberlain;Nancy J. Keuthen

  • Reduced basal ganglia volumes in trichotillomania measured via morphometric magnetic resonance imaging.

    Richard L. O'Sullivan;Scott L. Rauch;Hans C. Breiter;Igor D. Grachev

  • The prevalence of pathologic skin picking in US adults.

    Nancy J. Keuthen;Lorrin M. Koran;Elias Aboujaoude;Michael D. Large

  • Prevalence of body dysmorphic disorder in a German college student sample.

    Antje Bohne;Sabine Wilhelm;Nancy J Keuthen;Irmela Florin

  • Skin picking in German students. Prevalence, phenomenology, and associated characteristics.

    Antje Bohne;Sabine Wilhelm;Nancy J. Keuthen;L. E. E. Baer

  • The child and adolescent trichotillomania impact project: descriptive psychopathology, comorbidity, functional impairment, and treatment utilization.

    Martin E. Franklin;Christopher A. Flessner;Douglas W. Woods;Nancy J. Keuthen

  • Styles of pulling in trichotillomania: exploring differences in symptom severity, phenomenology, and functional impact.

    Christopher A. Flessner;Christine A. Conelea;Douglas W. Woods;Martin E. Franklin

  • The Skin Picking Scale: scale construction and psychometric analyses.

    Nancy J Keuthen;Sabine Wilhelm;Thilo Deckersbach;Iris M Engelhard

  • DBT-enhanced cognitive-behavioral treatment for trichotillomania: A randomized controlled trial.

    Nancy J. Keuthen;Barbara O. Rothbaum;Jeanne Fama;Erin Altenburger

  • Affective regulation in trichotillomania: Evidence from a large-scale internet survey.

    Anna Shusterman;Lauren Feld;Lee Baer;Nancy Keuthen

  • Development of Major Depressive Disorder During Smoking-Cessation Treatment

    Belinda Borrelli;Raymond Niaura;Nancy J. Keuthen;Michael G. Goldstein

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael A. Jenike
Michael A. Jenike Harvard University
Douglas W. Woods
Douglas W. Woods Marquette University
Dan J. Stein
Dan J. Stein University of Cape Town
Martin E. Franklin
Martin E. Franklin University of Pennsylvania
Lee Baer
Lee Baer Harvard University
Christopher A. Flessner
Christopher A. Flessner Brown University
Sabine Wilhelm
Sabine Wilhelm Harvard University
Cary R. Savage
Cary R. Savage University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Jon E. Grant
Jon E. Grant University of Chicago
Thilo Deckersbach
Thilo Deckersbach Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to a wide range of online degrees and career pathways, especially in the fields of counseling, therapy, and social work. Many students interested in making a difference in their communities choose to follow social work as a career. Each state in the USA has its own requirements and pathways for becoming a licensed social worker.

For example, those interested in practicing in Nevada should review the Nevada social work license requirements to understand the educational and experience criteria. If you plan to practice in New Hampshire, it’s important to look into the process outlined in how to become a social worker in New Hampshire.

Similarly, aspiring social workers in New Jersey should explore the steps found in how to become a social worker in New Jersey. For those targeting a career in New Mexico, make sure you are familiar with the requirements to be a social worker in New Mexico to stay on the right track.

By researching these pathways, you can choose the right online degree and plan for a successful, impactful career in psychology-related fields across the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Nancy J. Keuthen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles