World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 67 2570 2353 1488 1331 160 19929

Cary R. Savage publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Cary R. Savage between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Cary R. Savage published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 5.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 1996. 5 of the 177 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 1996. 1993: 2 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 14 publications 1997: 10 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 4 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 6 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 2 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 2 publications
1993 2025

177 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Cary R. Savage: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 2
1994 5
1995 8
1996 14
1997 10
1998 8
1999 3
2000 8
2001 5
2002 3
2003 1
2004 4
2005 5
2006 8
2007 5
2008 5
2009 6
2010 5
2011 4
2012 5
2013 6
2014 11
2015 7
2016 7
2017 10
2018 4
2019 1
2020 6
2021 1
2022 2
2023 3
2024 3
2025 2
Total 177
Download as CSV

Cary R. Savage publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cary R. Savage sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 160 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576 160
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Cary R. Savage D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cary R. Savage sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 66–67 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218 67
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Cary R. Savage is affiliated with the University of Nebraska-Lincoln in the United States. Their research spans primarily within the fields of Neuroscience and Medicine, with a focus on several subfields including Cognitive Neuroscience, Epidemiology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Clinical Psychology, and Applied Psychology.

The scientist's work addresses multiple topics, notably Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Traumatic Brain Injury Research, Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies, Eating Disorders and Behaviors, Behavioral Health and Interventions, Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation, and Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances.

Representative recent publications include:

  • "Modeling interactions between brain function, diet adherence behaviors, and weight loss success" (2020), published in Obesity Science & Practice
  • "The Role of Reported Affective Symptoms and Anxiety in Recovery Trajectories After Sport-Related Concussion" (2022), published in The American Journal of Sports Medicine
  • "Effects of semantic categorization strategy training on episodic memory in children and adolescents" (2020), published in PLoS ONE
  • "Core Neuropsychological Measures for Obesity and Diabetes Trials: Initial Report" (2020), published in Frontiers in Psychology
  • "Much Ado About Missingness: A Demonstration of Full Information Maximum Likelihood Estimation to Address Missingness in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data" (2021), published in Frontiers in Neuroscience

Among the frequent venues where this researcher publishes are PLoS ONE, Frontiers in Psychology, International Journal of Obesity, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), and The American Journal of Sports Medicine.

Collaborations are evident in coauthorship with Douglas H. Schultz, Heather C. Bouchard, Kate Higgins, Maital Neta, and Julia M. Laing-Young, each with multiple joint publications reflecting ongoing research partnerships.

Best Publications

  • A symptom provocation study of posttraumatic stress disorder using positron emission tomography and script-driven imagery

    S L Rauch;B A van der Kolk;R E Fisler;N M Alpert

  • Regional Cerebral Blood Flow Measured During Symptom Provocation in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Using Oxygen 15—Labeled Carbon Dioxide and Positron Emission Tomography

    Scott L. Rauch;Michael A. Jenike;Nathaniel M. Alpert;Lee Baer

  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging of symptom provocation in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Hans C. Breiter;Scott L. Rauch;Kenneth K. Kwong;John R. Baker

  • Predictors of cognitive change in older persons: MacArthur studies of successful aging.

    Marilyn S. Albert;Kenneth Jones;Cary R. Savage;Lisa Berkman

  • Conscious recollection and the human hippocampal formation: Evidence from positron emission tomography

    Daniel L. Schacter;Nathaniel M. Alpert;Cary R. Savage;Scott L. Rauch

  • Impaired recruitment of the hippocampus during conscious recollection in schizophrenia.

    Stephan Heckers;Scott L. Rauch;Donald Goff;Cary R. Savage

  • Organizational strategies mediate nonverbal memory impairment in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Cary R Savage;Lee Baer;Nancy J Keuthen;Halle D Brown

  • The functional neuroanatomy of anxiety: a study of three disorders using positron emission tomography and symptom provocation

    Scott L. Rauch;Cary R. Savage;Nathaniel M. Alpert;Alan J. Fischman

  • The Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Hairpulling Scale: 1. Development and Factor Analyses

    Nancy J. Keuthen;Richard L. O’Sullivan;Joseph N. Ricciardi;David Shera

  • Striatal Recruitment During an Implicit Sequence Learning Task as Measured by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    Scott L. Rauch;Paul J. Whalen;Cary R. Savage;Tim Curran

  • A Positron Emission Tomographic Study of Simple Phobic Symptom Provocation

    Scott L. Rauch;Cary R. Savage;Nathaniel M. Alpert;Euripedes C. Miguel

  • Sensory phenomena in obsessive-compulsive disorder and Tourette's disorder.

    Euripedes C. Miguel;Maria Conceição do Rosário-Campos;Helena da Silva Prado;Raquel do Valle

  • Cerebral structural abnormalities in obsessive-compulsive disorder. A quantitative morphometric magnetic resonance imaging study.

    Michael A. Jenike;Hans C. Breiter;Lee Baer;David N. Kennedy

  • Strategic processing and episodic memory impairment in obsessive compulsive disorder.

    Cary R. Savage;Thilo Deckersbach;Sabine Wilhelm;Scott L. Rauch

  • Probing striatal function in obsessive-compulsive disorder: a PET study of implicit sequence learning.

    Rauch Sl;Savage Cr;Alpert Nm;Dougherty D

  • Obese children show hyperactivation to food pictures in brain networks linked to motivation, reward and cognitive control

    A. S. Bruce;L. M. Holsen;R. J. Chambers;L. E. Martin

  • Neural mechanisms associated with food motivation in obese and healthy weight adults.

    Laura E. Martin;Laura M. Holsen;Rebecca J. Chambers;Amanda S. Bruce

  • A PET Investigation of implicit and explicit sequence learning

    Scott L. Rauch;Cary R. Savage;Halle D. Brown;Tim Curran

  • The role of hippocampus and frontal cortex in age-related memory changes: A PET study

    Daniel L. Schacter;Cary R. Savage;Nathaniel M. Alpert;Scott L. Rauch

  • Neuropsychological impairment associated with compulsive hoarding

    Jessica R. Grisham;Timothy A. Brown;Cary R. Savage;Gail Steketee

Frequent Co-Authors

Scott L. Rauch
Scott L. Rauch McLean Hospital
Michael A. Jenike
Michael A. Jenike Harvard University
Lee Baer
Lee Baer Harvard University
Nathaniel M. Alpert
Nathaniel M. Alpert Harvard University
Thilo Deckersbach
Thilo Deckersbach Harvard University
Nancy J. Keuthen
Nancy J. Keuthen Harvard University
Alan J. Fischman
Alan J. Fischman Harvard University
Euripedes Constantino Miguel
Euripedes Constantino Miguel Universidade de São Paulo
Hans C. Breiter
Hans C. Breiter University of Cincinnati
Tim Curran
Tim Curran University of Colorado Boulder

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens the door to numerous online degree options and diverse career pathways. Many students pursue related fields like social work, where education and licensure requirements vary by state.

Earning an online psychology or social work degree can be a flexible and convenient way to start this journey. Aspiring social workers in Utah should be aware of the Utah social work education requirements. Similarly, those interested in practicing in Vermont can explore the detailed steps outlined in how to become a social worker in Vermont.

If you are considering Virginia, make sure to review the Virginia social work education requirements. In Washington, specific guidelines are also provided for achieving licensure as described in the Washington social work license requirements.

Understanding these requirements not only helps you choose the right online program, but also ensures you are on the correct path for your desired career and location.

Best Scientists Citing Cary R. Savage

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles