World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
52
Citations
9231
World Ranking
3669
National Ranking
242

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
54
Citations
9821
World Ranking
4076
National Ranking
315

Paul L. Younger publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul L. Younger sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 252 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Paul L. Younger D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul L. Younger sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul L. Younger is affiliated with the University of Glasgow in the United Kingdom. Their research contributions are linked to this academic institution, which provides a context for their scientific work and collaborations.

There are no records of recent papers, co-authors, or specific publication venues associated with their name in the available data. As such, details concerning particular scientific articles, collaborations, or journals cannot be provided.

Similarly, information regarding the main fields of study, subfields, and main topics explored by Paul L. Younger is not present in the data set. This limits insights into the specific areas of academic focus or research expertise held by this scientist.

There are no recorded book publications or awards documented for Paul L. Younger in the provided information. Consequently, no mentions of contributions through monographs, edited volumes, or recognitions in the form of prizes or honors can be included.

Best Publications

  • Mine Water: Hydrology, Pollution, Remediation

    Paul L Younger;Steven A Banwart;Robert S Hedin

  • Mine-water chemistry: the good, the bad and the ugly

    David Banks;Paul L. Younger;Rolf-Tore Arnesen;Egil R. Iversen

  • Submarine groundwater discharge

    Paul L. Younger

  • Mining Impacts on the Fresh Water Environment : Technical and Managerial Guidelines for Catchment-Focused Remediation

    JM Amezaga;C Baresel;G Destouni;J Göbel

  • Phosphorus removal from waste waters using basic oxygen steel slag.

    Lawrence I Bowden;Adam P Jarvis;Paul L Younger;Karen L Johnson

  • Mine Water Hydrology

    Paul L. Younger;Steven A. Banwart;Robert S. Hedin

  • Wetland treatment at extremes of pH: A review

    W.M. Mayes;L.C. Batty;P.L. Younger;A.P. Jarvis

  • Groundwater in the environment : an introduction

    Paul L. Younger

  • Mine water pollution in Scotland: nature, extent and preventative strategies.

    P.L. Younger

  • Underground coal gasification with CCS: a pathway to decarbonising industry

    Dermot J. Roddy;Paul L. Younger

  • A strategy for modeling ground water rebound in abandoned deep mine systems.

    R. Adams;P.L. Younger

  • Substrate characterisation for a subsurface reactive barrier to treat colliery spoil leachate.

    Philip W Amos;Paul L Younger

  • Hydrogeochemistry of alkaline steel slag leachates in the UK

    Will Mayes;Paul Younger;Jon Aumonier

  • Predicting temporal changes in total iron concentrations in groundwaters flowing from abandoned deep mines: A first approximation

    Paul L Younger

  • Growth of Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin ex. Steudel in mine water treatment wetlands: effects of metal and nutrient uptake.

    Lesley C Batty;Paul L Younger

  • Hydrogeochemistry of minewaters flowing from abandoned coal workings in County Durham

    Paul Younger

  • Broadening the scope of mine water environmental impact assessment

    Adam P Jarvis;Paul L Younger

  • Environmental impacts of coal mining and associated wastes: a geochemical perspective

    Paul L. Younger

  • Addressing the CO2 emissions of the world's largest coal producer and consumer: Lessons from the Haishiwan Coalfield, China

    Wei Li;Paul L. Younger;Yuanping Cheng;Baoyong Zhang

  • Long-term changes in the quality of polluted minewater discharges from abandoned underground coal workings in Scotland

    S. C. Wood;P. L. Younger;N. S. Robins

Frequent Co-Authors

Rob Westaway
Rob Westaway University of Glasgow
Manosh C. Paul
Manosh C. Paul University of Glasgow
Steven A. Banwart
Steven A. Banwart University of Leeds
Nader Karimi
Nader Karimi University of Southampton
David A. Banks
David A. Banks University of Leeds
Andrew C. Aplin
Andrew C. Aplin Durham University
David A. C. Manning
David A. C. Manning Newcastle University
Kate V. Heal
Kate V. Heal University of Edinburgh
Keith Smith
Keith Smith University of Edinburgh
Yuanping Cheng
Yuanping Cheng China University of Mining and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the demand grows for highly skilled professionals in Engineering and Technology, flexible education options have become more valuable than ever. Online programs now offer accelerated schedules, accessible formats, and targeted certifications to help you advance your career on your own terms. For those looking to boost their credentials quickly, 6 month masters degree programs are a smart solution. These condensed curriculums are designed for students who want to earn an advanced degree in record time without sacrificing quality.

Earning specialized certifications can also open doors to new roles and higher salaries. If you’re researching the best certifications for jobs in tech and engineering, you’ll find there are many career-focused programs specifically geared towards fast-growing and high-paying fields.

Balancing family responsibilities? Explore accredited college programs for moms that offer supportive environments and flexible online courses to help you finish your degree while managing a busy household.

For those seeking to upskill quickly, many accredited institutions provide college classes online in as little as six weeks. Whether you're advancing in your current role or making a career switch, online pathways make it easier than ever to achieve your educational and professional goals in Engineering and Technology.

Best Scientists Citing Paul L. Younger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles