World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 60 2170 2070 143 132 489 14512
Environmental Sciences 62 2582 2461 198 190 541 16529

Miklas Scholz publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Miklas Scholz between 1996 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Miklas Scholz published across 31 years, from 1996 to 2026, averaging 22.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 75 publications in 2024. 19 of the 684 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 75. Peak 75 publications in 2024. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 6 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 7 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 17 publications 2005: 28 publications 2006: 65 publications 2007: 29 publications 2008: 20 publications 2009: 35 publications 2010: 39 publications 2011: 27 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 23 publications 2015: 25 publications 2016: 54 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 26 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 41 publications 2022: 25 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 75 publications 2025: 18 publications 2026: 1 publication
1996 2026

684 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Miklas Scholz: publications per year, 1996 to 2026
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 6
1998 5
1999 1
2000 7
2001 6
2002 11
2003 13
2004 17
2005 28
2006 65
2007 29
2008 20
2009 35
2010 39
2011 27
2012 20
2013 15
2014 23
2015 25
2016 54
2017 15
2018 15
2019 26
2020 11
2021 41
2022 25
2023 10
2024 75
2025 18
2026 1
Total 684
Download as CSV

Miklas Scholz publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Miklas Scholz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 488–497 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 489 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29 489
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Miklas Scholz D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Miklas Scholz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152 60
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Miklas Scholz is affiliated with the University of Salford in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science, with extensive work in related subfields including Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Water Science and Technology, Environmental Engineering, Global and Planetary Change, and Ecology.

Key topics in their research encompass Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment, Wastewater Treatment and Reuse, Urban Stormwater Management Solutions, Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology, Coastal Wetland Ecosystem Dynamics, Environmental Sustainability in Business, and Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior.

The scientist has contributed to several papers published in recognized journals. Notable recent publications include:

  • Impact of climate change on wetland ecosystems: A critical review of experimental wetlands, 2021, Journal of Environmental Management
  • Relationship between corporate social responsibility at the micro-level and environmental performance: The mediating role of employee pro-environmental behavior and the moderating role of gender, 2021, Sustainable Production and Consumption
  • Climate Change, Water Quality and Water-Related Challenges: A Review with Focus on Pakistan, 2020, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • A CSR perspective to foster employee creativity in the banking sector: The role of work engagement and psychological safety, 2022, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
  • Evaluation and Prediction of Groundwater Quality for Irrigation Using an Integrated Water Quality Indices, Machine Learning Models and GIS Approaches: A Representative Case Study, 2023, Water

Frequent collaborators in their work include Naveed Ahmad, Saad Sh. Sammen, Zaher Mundher Yaseen, Zia Ullah, and Heesup Han.

Their research is often published in journals such as Water, Sustainability, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Frontiers in Psychology, and Agronomy.

Best Publications

  • Textile dye wastewater characteristics and constituents of synthetic effluents : a critical review

    D. A. Yaseen;M. Scholz;M. Scholz;M. Scholz

  • Carbon Storage and Fluxes within Freshwater Wetlands: a Critical Review

    Birol Kayranli;Miklas Scholz;Atif Mustafa;Åsa Hedmark

  • Review of permeable pavement systems

    Miklas Scholz;Piotr Grabowiecki

  • Impact of climate change on wetland ecosystems: A critical review of experimental wetlands

    Shokoufeh Salimi;Suhad A.A.A.N. Almuktar;Suhad A.A.A.N. Almuktar;Miklas Scholz;Miklas Scholz;Miklas Scholz

  • Wetland Systems to Control Urban Runoff

    Miklas Scholz

  • Wetlands for wastewater treatment and subsequent recycling of treated effluent: a review

    Suhad A A A N Almuktar;Suhad A A A N Almuktar;Suhail N Abed;Miklas Scholz;Miklas Scholz;Miklas Scholz

  • Constructed Wetlands: A Review

    Miklas Scholz;Byoung‐hwa Lee

  • Phosphorus recovery from municipal wastewater treatment: Critical review of challenges and opportunities for developing countries.

    Mariana Cardoso Chrispim;Mariana Cardoso Chrispim;Miklas Scholz;Miklas Scholz;Miklas Scholz;Marcelo Antunes Nolasco

  • Review of remediation practices regarding cadmium-enriched farmland soil with particular reference to China.

    X. Tang;Q. Li;M. Wu;L. Lin

  • Ecological equilibrium on biological activated carbon

    M. Scholz;R.J. Martin

  • What is the role of Phragmites australis in experimental constructed wetland filters treating urban runoff

    Byoung-Hwa Lee;Miklas Scholz

  • Drivers of changing urban flood risk : A framework for action

    Ronny Berndtsson;Per Becker;Andreas Persson;Henrik Aspegren

  • Comparison of Relationships Between pH, Dissolved Oxygen and Chlorophyll a for Aquaculture and Non-aquaculture Waters

    Changjuan Zang;Suiliang Huang;Min Wu;Shenglan Du

  • The Integrated Constructed Wetlands (ICW) concept

    Miklas Scholz;Rory Harrington;Paul Carroll;Atif Mustafa

  • Climate change, water quality and water-related challenges : A review with focus on Pakistan

    Toqeer Ahmed;Mohammad Zounemat-Kermani;Miklas Scholz;Miklas Scholz;Miklas Scholz

  • Performance comparison of experimental constructed wetlands with different filter media and macrophytes treating industrial wastewater contaminated with lead and copper

    Miklas Scholz;Jing Xu

  • Evaluation and Prediction of Groundwater Quality for Irrigation Using an Integrated Water Quality Indices, Machine Learning Models and GIS Approaches: A Representative Case Study

    Unknown

  • Review of Recent Trends in Capillary Suction Time (CST) Dewaterability Testing Research

    Miklas Scholz

  • An Improved Model of SiO Maser Emission in Miras

    M. D. Gray;M. Wittkowski;M. Scholz;E. M. L. Humphreys

  • Wetland Systems: Storm Water Management Control

    Miklas Scholz

  • The Conquest of Nature – Water, Landscape, and the Making of Modern Germany

    Miklas Scholz

Frequent Co-Authors

Mohammad Zounemat-Kermani
Mohammad Zounemat-Kermani Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman
Heesup Han
Heesup Han Sejong University
Kate V. Heal
Kate V. Heal University of Edinburgh
Peadar G. Lawlor
Peadar G. Lawlor Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority
Jos T. A. Verhoeven
Jos T. A. Verhoeven Utrecht University
Mu. Naushad
Mu. Naushad King Saud University
Ronny Berndtsson
Ronny Berndtsson Lund University
Rolf Larsson
Rolf Larsson Uppsala University
Steve P. McGrath
Steve P. McGrath Rothamsted Research
Tansir Ahamad
Tansir Ahamad King Saud University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Miklas Scholz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles