World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
46
Citations
9759
World Ranking
5997
National Ranking
395

Peter Kuschk publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Kuschk sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 134 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Peter Kuschk D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Kuschk sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Kuschk is affiliated with the Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research in Germany. Their work is connected to this institution, which is known for research contributions in environmental science and related fields.

There is no recorded information regarding recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues associated with Peter Kuschk. Similarly, no data on specific fields or subfields of study, main topics of work, book publications, or awards is available to further detail their research profile.

Best Publications

  • Effects of plants and microorganisms in constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment.

    U. Stottmeister;A. Wießner;P. Kuschk;U. Kappelmeyer

  • Development of constructed wetlands in performance intensifications for wastewater treatment: A nitrogen and organic matter targeted review

    Shubiao Wu;Peter Kuschk;Hans Brix;Jan Vymazal

  • Monitoring and assessing processes of organic chemicals removal in constructed wetlands

    Gwenaël Imfeld;Mareike Braeckevelt;Peter Kuschk;Hans H. Richnow

  • New Aspects of Microbial Nitrogen Transformations in the Context of Wastewater Treatment – A Review

    D. Paredes;P. Kuschk;T. S. A. Mbwette;F. Stange

  • Annual cycle of nitrogen removal by a pilot-scale subsurface horizontal flow in a constructed wetland under moderate climate.

    P Kuschk;A Wiessner;U Kappelmeyer;E Weissbrodt

  • Effect of plants and filter materials on bacteria removal in pilot-scale constructed wetlands.

    Gabriela Vacca;Helmut Wand;Marcell Nikolausz;Peter Kuschk

  • Treatment of industrial effluents in constructed wetlands: Challenges, operational strategies and overall performance

    Shubiao Wu;Scott Wallace;Hans Brix;Peter Kuschk

  • Microbial Processes of Heavy Metal Removal from Carbon‐Deficient Effluents in Constructed Wetlands

    D.B. Kosolapov;P. Kuschk;M.B. Vainshtein;A.V. Vatsourina

  • Potential roles of anaerobic ammonium and methane oxidation in the nitrogen cycle of wetland ecosystems

    Guibing Zhu;Mike S. M. Jetten;Peter Kuschk;Katharina F. Ettwig

  • Influence of the redox condition dynamics on the removal efficiency of a laboratory-scale constructed wetland

    A. Wiessner;U. Kappelmeyer;P. Kuschk;M. Kastner

  • Hydroponic root mats for wastewater treatment-a review.

    Zhongbing Chen;Zhongbing Chen;Diego Paredes Cuervo;Jochen A. Müller;Arndt Wiessner

  • Trace analysis of technical nonylphenol, bisphenol A and 17α-ethinylestradiol in wastewater using solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry

    P. Braun;M. Moeder;St. Schrader;P. Popp

  • Sulphur transformations in constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: A review

    Shubiao Wu;Peter Kuschk;Arndt Wiessner;Jochen Müller

  • Sulfate removal and sulfur transformation in constructed wetlands: The roles of filling material and plant biomass

    Yi Chen;Yue Wen;Qi Zhou;Jingang Huang

  • Nitrogen transforming community in a horizontal subsurface-flow constructed wetland

    Oksana Coban;Peter Kuschk;Uwe Kappelmeyer;Oliver Spott

  • Sulphate reduction and the removal of carbon and ammonia in a laboratory-scale constructed wetland.

    A. Wiessner;U. Kappelmeyer;P. Kuschk;M. Kästner

  • Removal of bacteria by filtration in planted and non-planted sand columns.

    H. Wand;G. Vacca;P. Kuschk;M. Krüger

  • Plant – Rhizosphere-Microflora Association During Phytoremediation of PAH-Contaminated Soil

    A Muratova;Th Hūbner;S Tischer;O Turkovskaya

  • Phosphine in soils, sludges, biogases and atmospheric implications—a review

    Dietmar Glindemann;Dietmar Glindemann;Marc Edwards;Ji-ang Liu;Peter Kuschk

  • Abilities of Helophyte Species to Release Oxygen into Rhizospheres with Varying Redox Conditions in Laboratory-Scale Hydroponic Systems

    A. Wießner;P. Kuschk;M. Kästner;U. Stottmeister

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthias Kästner
Matthias Kästner Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Renjie Dong
Renjie Dong China Agricultural University
Jan Vymazal
Jan Vymazal Czech University of Life Sciences Prague
Peter Popp
Peter Popp Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Marc Edwards
Marc Edwards Virginia Tech
Hans Brix
Hans Brix Aarhus University
Xiaochang C. Wang
Xiaochang C. Wang Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology
Qi Zhou
Qi Zhou Tongji University
Gwenaël Imfeld
Gwenaël Imfeld University of Strasbourg
Mike S. M. Jetten
Mike S. M. Jetten Radboud University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring environmental sciences often leads to interdisciplinary career opportunities, making online degrees an attractive option for many students. For those interested in public administration and policy roles connected to environmental issues, some of the easiest online mpa programs offer streamlined paths to gaining essential skills in management and governance.

Understanding societal impacts is also crucial in this field. Students may consider pursuing the best online sociology bachelor degree to deepen their grasp of human behavior and social structures, which are integral when addressing environmental challenges.

For advanced careers in education or research, online doctoral programs can provide flexible options. Some students look towards 1 year phd programs online no dissertation to expedite their studies without sacrificing quality. Additionally, those aiming to advance within the education sector might find valuable opportunities through eds to edd programs online, which support seamless progression toward terminal degrees.

Choosing the right online degree aligned with environmental sciences can open doors to diverse career pathways, ranging from policy development to education and research, ultimately contributing to meaningful environmental solutions.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Kuschk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles