World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 67 2524 2397 1129 1060 176 17164

Charles F. Sing publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Charles F. Sing between 1967 and 2017, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Charles F. Sing published across 51 years, from 1967 to 2017, averaging 3.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 1986. 1 of the 197 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1967 to 2017. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 1986. 1967: 3 publications 1968: 1 publication 1969: 3 publications 1970: 3 publications 1971: 2 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 3 publications 1974: 5 publications 1975: 3 publications 1976: 5 publications 1977: 2 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 4 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 7 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 12 publications 1987: 11 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 7 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 3 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 1 publication
1967 2017

197 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Charles F. Sing: publications per year, 1967 to 2017
Year Publications
1967 3
1968 1
1969 3
1970 3
1971 2
1972 0
1973 3
1974 5
1975 3
1976 5
1977 2
1978 0
1979 4
1980 2
1981 3
1982 2
1983 7
1984 5
1985 4
1986 12
1987 11
1988 3
1989 1
1990 7
1991 5
1992 6
1993 3
1994 5
1995 3
1996 7
1997 2
1998 7
1999 6
2000 10
2001 4
2002 3
2003 3
2004 4
2005 6
2006 6
2007 4
2008 6
2009 2
2010 4
2011 0
2012 3
2013 1
2014 3
2015 2
2016 0
2017 1
Total 197
Download as CSV

Charles F. Sing publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles F. Sing sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 175–184 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 176 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178 176
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Charles F. Sing D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles F. Sing sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 66–67 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184 67
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Gene
  • Internal medicine
  • Genetics

His main research concerns Genetics, Genetic variation, Allele, Haplotype and Gene. As part of his studies on Genetics, Charles F. Sing often connects relevant subjects like Blood pressure. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Nucleotide diversity, Population size, Confounding and Candidate gene.

Charles F. Sing works mostly in the field of Allele, limiting it down to topics relating to Apolipoprotein E and, in certain cases, Cholesterol and Genetic variability. His Haplotype research focuses on Genetic association and how it relates to Genetic heterogeneity, Phylogenetic tree and Clade. His Gene research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Disease risk and Burden of disease.

His most cited work include:

  • A Cladistic Analysis of Phenotypic Associations With Haplotypes Inferred From Restriction Endonuclease Mapping. I. Basic Theory and an Analysis of Alcohol Dehydrogenase Activity in Drosophila (704 citations)
  • DNA sequence diversity in a 9.7-kb region of the human lipoprotein lipase gene (467 citations)
  • Haplotype structure and population genetic inferences from nucleotide- sequence variation in human lipoprotein lipase (432 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Charles F. Sing mainly focuses on Genetics, Internal medicine, Genetic variation, Endocrinology and Genotype. His research is interdisciplinary, bridging the disciplines of Apolipoprotein E and Genetics. His research investigates the connection between Apolipoprotein E and topics such as Apolipoprotein B that intersect with issues in Lipoprotein.

The study incorporates disciplines such as Genetic variability, Nucleotide diversity, Linkage disequilibrium, Haplotype and Candidate gene in addition to Genetic variation. His Endocrinology research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Antigen, Increased risk and Lymphocyte. His study in the field of Polymorphism also crosses realms of Context.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Genetics (50.29%)
  • Internal medicine (28.90%)
  • Genetic variation (26.59%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2004-2015)?

  • Genetics (50.29%)
  • Single-nucleotide polymorphism (10.98%)
  • Genotype (21.97%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His scientific interests lie mostly in Genetics, Single-nucleotide polymorphism, Genotype, Disease and Apolipoprotein E. His work on Allele, Genetic association, Haplotype and Gene as part of general Genetics research is often related to Context, thus linking different fields of science. His Haplotype research includes elements of Genetic variation and Population genetics.

His study on Polymorphism is often connected to Variation as part of broader study in Genotype. His research integrates issues of Oncology, Genetic predisposition and Allele frequency in his study of Apolipoprotein E. As part of one scientific family, Charles F. Sing deals mainly with the area of Internal medicine, narrowing it down to issues related to the Endocrinology, and often Increased risk and Apoa5 gene.

Between 2004 and 2015, his most popular works were:

  • Deep resequencing reveals excess rare recent variants consistent with explosive population growth (217 citations)
  • Neutral genomic regions refine models of recent rapid human population growth (91 citations)
  • Tree Scanning: A Method for Using Haplotype Trees in Phenotype/Genotype Association Studies (86 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Gene
  • Internal medicine
  • Genetics

His primary areas of investigation include Genetics, Genetic association, Genetic variation, Single-nucleotide polymorphism and Haplotype. His studies in Genetics integrate themes in fields like Population growth, Natural selection and Disease risk. His Genetic variation research incorporates themes from Coronary artery disease, Increased risk, Young adult and Apoa5 gene.

Charles F. Sing focuses mostly in the field of Single-nucleotide polymorphism, narrowing it down to matters related to Cholesterol and, in some cases, Candidate gene and Apolipoprotein E. Charles F. Sing has included themes like Endocrinology, Internal medicine and Apolipoprotein B in his Candidate gene study. His study with Haplotype involves better knowledge in Allele.

Best Publications

  • A Cladistic Analysis of Phenotypic Associations With Haplotypes Inferred From Restriction Endonuclease Mapping. I. Basic Theory and an Analysis of Alcohol Dehydrogenase Activity in Drosophila

    Alan R. Templeton;Eric Boerwinkle;Charles F. Sing

  • DNA sequence diversity in a 9.7-kb region of the human lipoprotein lipase gene

    Deborah A. Nickerson;Scott L. Taylor;Kenneth M. Weiss;Andrew G. Clark

  • Haplotype structure and population genetic inferences from nucleotide- sequence variation in human lipoprotein lipase

    Andrew G. Clark;Kenneth M. Weiss;Deborah A. Nickerson;Scott L. Taylor

  • Apolipoprotein E Variation at the Sequence Haplotype Level: Implications for the Origin and Maintenance of a Major Human Polymorphism

    Stephanie M. Fullerton;Andrew G. Clark;Kenneth M. Weiss;Deborah A. Nickerson

  • A Combinatorial Partitioning Method to Identify Multilocus Genotypic Partitions That Predict Quantitative Trait Variation

    M.R. Nelson;S.L.R. Kardia;R.E. Ferrell;C.F. Sing

  • The use of measured genotype information in the analysis of quantitative phenotypes in man. I. Models and analytical methods.

    E. Boerwinkle;R. Chakraborty;C. F. Sing

  • The use of measured genotype information in the analysis of quantitative phenotypes in man

    Eric Boerwinkle;C. F. Sing

  • Genome-Wide Linkage Analyses of Systolic Blood Pressure Using Highly Discordant Siblings

    Julia Krushkal;Robert Ferrell;Stephen C. Mockrin;Stephen T. Turner

  • The use of measured genotype information in the analysis of quantitative phenotypes in man. II. The role of the apolipoprotein E polymorphism in determining levels, variability, and covariability of cholesterol, betalipoprotein, and triglycerides in a sample of unrelated individuals

    Eric Boerwinkle;S. Visvikis;D. Welsh;J. Steinmetz

  • Genes, Environment, and Cardiovascular Disease

    Charles F. Sing;Jari H. Stengård;Sharon L.R. Kardia

  • Multi-center genetic study of hypertension: The Family blood pressure program (FBPP)

    Eric Boerwinkle;C. Andrew Brown;Maurita Carrejo;Robert Ferrell

  • Deep resequencing reveals excess rare recent variants consistent with explosive population growth

    Alex Coventry;Lara M. Bull-Otterson;Xiaoming Liu;Andrew G. Clark

  • Variation in the Region of the Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Gene Influences Interindividual Differences in Blood Pressure Levels in Young White Males

    Myriam Fornage;Christopher I. Amos;Sharon Kardia;Charles F. Sing

  • Recombinational and mutational hotspots within the human lipoprotein lipase gene.

    Alan R. Templeton;Andrew G. Clark;Kenneth M. Weiss;Deborah A. Nickerson

  • Positional Genomic Analysis Identifies the β2-Adrenergic Receptor Gene as a Susceptibility Locus for Human Hypertension

    Molly S. Bray;Julia Krushkal;Li Li;Robert Ferrell

  • Sequence Diversity and Large-Scale Typing of SNPs in the Human Apolipoprotein E Gene

    Deborah A. Nickerson;Scott L. Taylor;Stephanie M. Fullerton;Kenneth M. Weiss

  • Effects of polymorphisms in apolipoproteins E, A-IV, and H on quantitative traits related to risk for cardiovascular disease.

    J Kaprio;R E Ferrell;B A Kottke;M I Kamboh

  • FAMILIAL AGGREGATION OF BLOOD PRESSURE AND WEIGHT IN ADOPTIVE FAMILIES II. ESTIMATION OF THE RELATIVE CONTRIBUTIONS OF GENETIC AND COMMON ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS TO BLOOD PRESSURE CORRELATIONS BETWEEN FAMILY MEMBERS

    Joseph L. Annest;Charles F. Sing;Pierre Biron;Jean Guy Mongeau

  • The gender-specific apolipoprotein E genotype influence on the distribution of lipids and apolipoproteins in the population of Rochester, MN. I. Pleiotropic effects on means and variances.

    Sharon L. Reilly;Robert E. Ferrell;Bruce A. Kottke;Mohammad I. Kamboh

  • Etiologic heterogeneity in alcoholism.

    Sheila B. Gilligan;Theodore Reich;C. Robert Cloninger;Charles F. Sing

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric Boerwinkle
Eric Boerwinkle The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
andrew g clark
andrew g clark Cornell University
Sharon L.R. Kardia
Sharon L.R. Kardia University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Robert E. Ferrell
Robert E. Ferrell University of Pittsburgh
George J. Brewer
George J. Brewer University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Alan R. Templeton
Alan R. Templeton Washington University in St. Louis
Anne Tybjærg-Hansen
Anne Tybjærg-Hansen University of Copenhagen
Kenneth M. Weiss
Kenneth M. Weiss Pennsylvania State University
Veikko Salomaa
Veikko Salomaa Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring an education in Genetics opens doors to multiple online degrees and career paths in health sciences. For those interested in clinical roles, there are nursing schools that do not require entrance exam requirements, making it easier to begin a healthcare career without the added stress of standardized tests.

Administrative and leadership roles are also in reach through the cheapest mha programs online healthcare options. These programs provide an affordable path for those looking to manage healthcare teams or lead organizations while complementing genetics expertise.

If you seek to enter nursing quickly, fast track lpn programs offer accelerated online options to start working in the field sooner. For advanced academic pursuits, consider online phd nursing programs, which let you expand your research and teaching skills alongside genetics specialties.

Each pathway aligns well with genetics, broadening your impact in healthcare, research, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Charles F. Sing

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles