World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
67
Citations
17164
World Ranking
2524
National Ranking
1129

Charles F. Sing publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles F. Sing sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 176 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Charles F. Sing D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles F. Sing sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Gene
  • Internal medicine
  • Genetics

His main research concerns Genetics, Genetic variation, Allele, Haplotype and Gene. As part of his studies on Genetics, Charles F. Sing often connects relevant subjects like Blood pressure. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Nucleotide diversity, Population size, Confounding and Candidate gene.

Charles F. Sing works mostly in the field of Allele, limiting it down to topics relating to Apolipoprotein E and, in certain cases, Cholesterol and Genetic variability. His Haplotype research focuses on Genetic association and how it relates to Genetic heterogeneity, Phylogenetic tree and Clade. His Gene research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Disease risk and Burden of disease.

His most cited work include:

  • A Cladistic Analysis of Phenotypic Associations With Haplotypes Inferred From Restriction Endonuclease Mapping. I. Basic Theory and an Analysis of Alcohol Dehydrogenase Activity in Drosophila (704 citations)
  • DNA sequence diversity in a 9.7-kb region of the human lipoprotein lipase gene (467 citations)
  • Haplotype structure and population genetic inferences from nucleotide- sequence variation in human lipoprotein lipase (432 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Charles F. Sing mainly focuses on Genetics, Internal medicine, Genetic variation, Endocrinology and Genotype. His research is interdisciplinary, bridging the disciplines of Apolipoprotein E and Genetics. His research investigates the connection between Apolipoprotein E and topics such as Apolipoprotein B that intersect with issues in Lipoprotein.

The study incorporates disciplines such as Genetic variability, Nucleotide diversity, Linkage disequilibrium, Haplotype and Candidate gene in addition to Genetic variation. His Endocrinology research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Antigen, Increased risk and Lymphocyte. His study in the field of Polymorphism also crosses realms of Context.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Genetics (50.29%)
  • Internal medicine (28.90%)
  • Genetic variation (26.59%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2004-2015)?

  • Genetics (50.29%)
  • Single-nucleotide polymorphism (10.98%)
  • Genotype (21.97%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His scientific interests lie mostly in Genetics, Single-nucleotide polymorphism, Genotype, Disease and Apolipoprotein E. His work on Allele, Genetic association, Haplotype and Gene as part of general Genetics research is often related to Context, thus linking different fields of science. His Haplotype research includes elements of Genetic variation and Population genetics.

His study on Polymorphism is often connected to Variation as part of broader study in Genotype. His research integrates issues of Oncology, Genetic predisposition and Allele frequency in his study of Apolipoprotein E. As part of one scientific family, Charles F. Sing deals mainly with the area of Internal medicine, narrowing it down to issues related to the Endocrinology, and often Increased risk and Apoa5 gene.

Between 2004 and 2015, his most popular works were:

  • Deep resequencing reveals excess rare recent variants consistent with explosive population growth (217 citations)
  • Neutral genomic regions refine models of recent rapid human population growth (91 citations)
  • Tree Scanning: A Method for Using Haplotype Trees in Phenotype/Genotype Association Studies (86 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Gene
  • Internal medicine
  • Genetics

His primary areas of investigation include Genetics, Genetic association, Genetic variation, Single-nucleotide polymorphism and Haplotype. His studies in Genetics integrate themes in fields like Population growth, Natural selection and Disease risk. His Genetic variation research incorporates themes from Coronary artery disease, Increased risk, Young adult and Apoa5 gene.

Charles F. Sing focuses mostly in the field of Single-nucleotide polymorphism, narrowing it down to matters related to Cholesterol and, in some cases, Candidate gene and Apolipoprotein E. Charles F. Sing has included themes like Endocrinology, Internal medicine and Apolipoprotein B in his Candidate gene study. His study with Haplotype involves better knowledge in Allele.

Best Publications

  • A Cladistic Analysis of Phenotypic Associations With Haplotypes Inferred From Restriction Endonuclease Mapping. I. Basic Theory and an Analysis of Alcohol Dehydrogenase Activity in Drosophila

    Alan R. Templeton;Eric Boerwinkle;Charles F. Sing

  • DNA sequence diversity in a 9.7-kb region of the human lipoprotein lipase gene

    Deborah A. Nickerson;Scott L. Taylor;Kenneth M. Weiss;Andrew G. Clark

  • Haplotype structure and population genetic inferences from nucleotide- sequence variation in human lipoprotein lipase

    Andrew G. Clark;Kenneth M. Weiss;Deborah A. Nickerson;Scott L. Taylor

  • Apolipoprotein E Variation at the Sequence Haplotype Level: Implications for the Origin and Maintenance of a Major Human Polymorphism

    Stephanie M. Fullerton;Andrew G. Clark;Kenneth M. Weiss;Deborah A. Nickerson

  • A Combinatorial Partitioning Method to Identify Multilocus Genotypic Partitions That Predict Quantitative Trait Variation

    M.R. Nelson;S.L.R. Kardia;R.E. Ferrell;C.F. Sing

  • The use of measured genotype information in the analysis of quantitative phenotypes in man. I. Models and analytical methods.

    E. Boerwinkle;R. Chakraborty;C. F. Sing

  • The use of measured genotype information in the analysis of quantitative phenotypes in man

    Eric Boerwinkle;C. F. Sing

  • Genome-Wide Linkage Analyses of Systolic Blood Pressure Using Highly Discordant Siblings

    Julia Krushkal;Robert Ferrell;Stephen C. Mockrin;Stephen T. Turner

  • The use of measured genotype information in the analysis of quantitative phenotypes in man. II. The role of the apolipoprotein E polymorphism in determining levels, variability, and covariability of cholesterol, betalipoprotein, and triglycerides in a sample of unrelated individuals

    Eric Boerwinkle;S. Visvikis;D. Welsh;J. Steinmetz

  • Genes, Environment, and Cardiovascular Disease

    Charles F. Sing;Jari H. Stengård;Sharon L.R. Kardia

  • Multi-center genetic study of hypertension: The Family blood pressure program (FBPP)

    Eric Boerwinkle;C. Andrew Brown;Maurita Carrejo;Robert Ferrell

  • Deep resequencing reveals excess rare recent variants consistent with explosive population growth

    Alex Coventry;Lara M. Bull-Otterson;Xiaoming Liu;Andrew G. Clark

  • Variation in the Region of the Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Gene Influences Interindividual Differences in Blood Pressure Levels in Young White Males

    Myriam Fornage;Christopher I. Amos;Sharon Kardia;Charles F. Sing

  • Recombinational and mutational hotspots within the human lipoprotein lipase gene.

    Alan R. Templeton;Andrew G. Clark;Kenneth M. Weiss;Deborah A. Nickerson

  • Positional Genomic Analysis Identifies the β2-Adrenergic Receptor Gene as a Susceptibility Locus for Human Hypertension

    Molly S. Bray;Julia Krushkal;Li Li;Robert Ferrell

  • Sequence Diversity and Large-Scale Typing of SNPs in the Human Apolipoprotein E Gene

    Deborah A. Nickerson;Scott L. Taylor;Stephanie M. Fullerton;Kenneth M. Weiss

  • Effects of polymorphisms in apolipoproteins E, A-IV, and H on quantitative traits related to risk for cardiovascular disease.

    J Kaprio;R E Ferrell;B A Kottke;M I Kamboh

  • FAMILIAL AGGREGATION OF BLOOD PRESSURE AND WEIGHT IN ADOPTIVE FAMILIES II. ESTIMATION OF THE RELATIVE CONTRIBUTIONS OF GENETIC AND COMMON ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS TO BLOOD PRESSURE CORRELATIONS BETWEEN FAMILY MEMBERS

    Joseph L. Annest;Charles F. Sing;Pierre Biron;Jean Guy Mongeau

  • The gender-specific apolipoprotein E genotype influence on the distribution of lipids and apolipoproteins in the population of Rochester, MN. I. Pleiotropic effects on means and variances.

    Sharon L. Reilly;Robert E. Ferrell;Bruce A. Kottke;Mohammad I. Kamboh

  • Etiologic heterogeneity in alcoholism.

    Sheila B. Gilligan;Theodore Reich;C. Robert Cloninger;Charles F. Sing

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric Boerwinkle
Eric Boerwinkle The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
andrew g clark
andrew g clark Cornell University
Sharon L.R. Kardia
Sharon L.R. Kardia University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Robert E. Ferrell
Robert E. Ferrell University of Pittsburgh
George J. Brewer
George J. Brewer University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Alan R. Templeton
Alan R. Templeton Washington University in St. Louis
Anne Tybjærg-Hansen
Anne Tybjærg-Hansen University of Copenhagen
Kenneth M. Weiss
Kenneth M. Weiss Pennsylvania State University
Veikko Salomaa
Veikko Salomaa Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring an education in Genetics opens doors to multiple online degrees and career paths in health sciences. For those interested in clinical roles, there are nursing schools that do not require entrance exam requirements, making it easier to begin a healthcare career without the added stress of standardized tests.

Administrative and leadership roles are also in reach through the cheapest mha programs online healthcare options. These programs provide an affordable path for those looking to manage healthcare teams or lead organizations while complementing genetics expertise.

If you seek to enter nursing quickly, fast track lpn programs offer accelerated online options to start working in the field sooner. For advanced academic pursuits, consider online phd nursing programs, which let you expand your research and teaching skills alongside genetics specialties.

Each pathway aligns well with genetics, broadening your impact in healthcare, research, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Charles F. Sing

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles