World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
89
Citations
42069
World Ranking
12462
National Ranking
6383

R. Shane Tubbs publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where R. Shane Tubbs sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 2,023 publications — 100th percentile

100% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

R. Shane Tubbs D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where R. Shane Tubbs sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

R. Shane Tubbs is affiliated with Tulane University in the United States and has a significant publication record primarily in the field of Medicine. Their research spans several subfields, including Surgery, Neurology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Epidemiology, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

The scientist's work covers multiple specialized topics, such as:

  • Peripheral Nerve Disorders
  • Head and Neck Surgical Oncology
  • Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
  • Meningioma and schwannoma management
  • Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
  • Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation
  • Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology

Frequent collaboration with several coauthors has been a notable aspect of their research career. These collaborators include Joe Iwanaga, Aaron S. Dumont, Łukasz Olewnik, Marios Loukas, and Nicol Zielińska.

Their papers have appeared extensively in multiple academic venues, with particularly numerous contributions to:

  • Clinical Anatomy
  • Cureus
  • Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy
  • Anatomy & Cell Biology
  • World Neurosurgery

Selected recent publications include:

  • Acknowledging the use of human cadaveric tissues in research papers: Recommendations from anatomical journal editors, 2020, Clinical Anatomy
  • A review of anatomy education during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: Revisiting traditional and modern methods to achieve future innovation, 2020, Clinical Anatomy
  • Standardized statement for the ethical use of human cadaveric tissues in anatomy research papers: Recommendations from Anatomical Journal Editors-in-Chief, 2022, Clinical Anatomy
  • Anatomical normality and variability: Historical perspective and methodological considerations, 2020, Translational Research in Anatomy
  • Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Pancreatitis, 2022, Diagnostics

Best Publications

  • Acknowledging the use of human cadaveric tissues in research papers: Recommendations from anatomical journal editors.

    Joe Iwanaga;Joe Iwanaga;Vishram Singh;Aiji Ohtsuka;Youngil Hwang

  • Bergman's comprehensive encyclopedia of human anatomic variation

    Ronald A. Bergman;R. Shane Tubbs;Mohammadali M. Shoja;Marios Loukas

  • Institutional experience with 500 cases of surgically treated pediatric Chiari malformation Type I.

    R. Shane Tubbs;Joshua Beckman;Robert P. Naftel;Joshua J. Chern

  • Surgical experience in 130 pediatric patients with Chiari I malformations.

    R Shane Tubbs;Matthew J McGirt;W Jerry Oakes

  • A review of anatomy education during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: Revisiting traditional and modern methods to achieve future innovation.

    Joe Iwanaga;Marios Loukas;Marios Loukas;Aaron S. Dumont;R. Shane Tubbs

  • Hypertonic saline for treating raised intracranial pressure: literature review with meta-analysis

    Martin M. Mortazavi;Andrew K. Romeo;Aman Deep;Christoph J. Griessenauer

  • Analysis of the posterior fossa in children with the Chiari 0 malformation.

    R. Shane Tubbs;Scott Elton;Paul Grabb;Stephen E. Dockery

  • The pediatric Chiari I malformation: a review

    R. Shane Tubbs;Michael J. Lyerly;Marios Loukas;Marios Loukas;Mohammadali Mohajel Shoja

  • Development of the anatomical quality assessment (AQUA) tool for the quality assessment of anatomical studies included in meta‐analyses and systematic reviews

    Brandon Michael Henry;Krzysztof A. Tomaszewski;Piravin Kumar Ramakrishnan;Joyeeta Roy

  • Facial asymmetry in young healthy subjects evaluated by statistical shape analysis

    Ilker Ercan;Senem Turan Ozdemir;Abdullah Etoz;Deniz Sigirli

  • The history of anatomy in Persia.

    Mohammadali Mohajel Shoja;R. Shane Tubbs

  • Ligaments of the craniocervical junction: A review

    R. Shane Tubbs;Justin D. Hallock;Virginia Radcliff;Robert P. Naftel

  • A critical analysis of the Chiari 1.5 malformation

    R Shane Tubbs;Bermans J Iskandar;Alfred A Bartolucci;W Jerry Oakes

  • Complications of chronic vagus nerve stimulation for epilepsy in children.

    Matthew D. Smyth;R. Shane Tubbs;E. Martina Bebin;Paula A. Grabb

  • The cranial dura mater: a review of its history, embryology, and anatomy.

    Nimer Adeeb;Martin M. Mortazavi;R. Shane Tubbs;Aaron A. Cohen-Gadol

  • A review of the thoracic splanchnic nerves and celiac ganglia

    Marios Loukas;Zachary Klaassen;William Merbs;R. Shane Tubbs

  • A review of subclavian steal syndrome with clinical correlation.

    Stephen Osiro;Anna Zurada;Jerzy Gielecki;Mohammadali Mohajel Shoja

  • Telesurgery: Past, Present, and Future.

    Paul J Choi;Rod J Oskouian;R. Shane Tubbs

  • Meckel's diverticulum: a review.

    Kiranjit Uppal;R. Shane Tubbs;Petru Matusz;Kitt Shaffer

  • Pediatric traumatic carotid, vertebral and cerebral artery dissections: a review

    Martin M. Mortazavi;Ketan Verma;R. Shane Tubbs;Mark Harrigan

Frequent Co-Authors

Aaron S. Dumont
Aaron S. Dumont Tulane University
Alfred A. Bartolucci
Alfred A. Bartolucci University of Alabama at Birmingham
Robert H. Anderson
Robert H. Anderson Newcastle University
Alon Harris
Alon Harris Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Nicholas M. Barbaro
Nicholas M. Barbaro The University of Texas at Austin
Douglas Kondziolka
Douglas Kondziolka New York University
Nalin Gupta
Nalin Gupta University of California, San Francisco
L. Dade Lunsford
L. Dade Lunsford University of Pittsburgh
John C. Flickinger
John C. Flickinger University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in medical careers but seeking flexible study options, there are a range of related online degrees to consider. Many students begin their journey by enrolling in affordable nursing programs online, which offer a cost-effective way to enter the healthcare field without relocating.

Registered nurses looking to advance their qualifications can explore the cheapest rn to bsn program online to increase their career prospects and earning potential efficiently. For those aiming for leadership or academic roles, an online nursing doctorate provides advanced training and opens doors to specialized positions.

Additionally, individuals with a non-nursing background can transition into nursing with direct entry msn programs online, helping them quickly gain the qualifications needed for high-demand roles. These online options make healthcare education more accessible, giving you multiple pathways to rewarding careers in medicine and health.

Best Scientists Citing R. Shane Tubbs

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles