World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Carmen Mihaela Neculita

Carmen Mihaela Neculita

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 33 9549 9141 450 421 124 4723

Carmen Mihaela Neculita publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Carmen Mihaela Neculita between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Carmen Mihaela Neculita published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 6.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2020. 18 of the 135 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2020. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 0 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 7 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 22 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 12 publications
2005 2025

135 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Carmen Mihaela Neculita: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 2
2007 3
2008 4
2009 0
2010 2
2011 3
2012 4
2013 1
2014 0
2015 1
2016 7
2017 7
2018 12
2019 11
2020 22
2021 13
2022 14
2023 10
2024 6
2025 12
Total 135
Download as CSV

Carmen Mihaela Neculita publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carmen Mihaela Neculita sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 124 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617 124
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Carmen Mihaela Neculita D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carmen Mihaela Neculita sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88 33
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Carmen Mihaela Neculita is affiliated with the University of Quebec in Canada, with extensive contributions to environmental science and engineering. Their work largely focuses on areas related to mining and environmental remediation.

The main fields of study in their research include Environmental Science and Engineering. Within these fields, their subfields of specialization are Environmental Chemistry, Civil and Structural Engineering, Geochemistry and Petrology, Biomedical Engineering, and Pollution.

The core topics addressed in their publications include:

  • Mine drainage and remediation techniques
  • Tailings Management and Properties
  • Arsenic contamination and mitigation
  • Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
  • Heavy metals in environment
  • Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
  • Radioactive element chemistry and processing

Neculita has published research in a variety of scientific journals, frequently contributing to:

  • Minerals Engineering
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Applied Geochemistry
  • Minerals
  • Chemosphere

Their recent scholarly articles include the following:

  • "Recovery potential of rare earth elements from mining and industrial residues: A review and cases studies", 2020, Journal of Geochemical Exploration
  • "Removal and potential recovery of rare earth elements from mine water", 2020, Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry
  • "Characterization of phosphate processing sludge from Tunisian mining basin and its potential valorization in fired bricks making", 2020, Journal of Cleaner Production
  • "Towards a Circular Economy in the Mining Industry: Possible Solutions for Water Recovery through Advanced Mineral Tailings Dewatering", 2024, Minerals
  • "Electro-Fenton beyond the Degradation of Organics: Treatment of Thiosalts in Contaminated Mine Water", 2021, Environmental Science & Technology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Neculita include Lucie Coudert, Éric Rosa, Mostafa Benzaazoua, Marouen Jouini, and Thomas Genty.

Best Publications

  • Passive treatment of acid mine drainage in bioreactors using sulfate-reducing bacteria: critical review and research needs.

    Carmen-Mihaela Neculita;Gérald J. Zagury;Bruno Bussière

  • Determination of point of zero charge of natural organic materials.

    Elisee Nsimba Bakatula;Dominique Richard;Carmen Mihaela Neculita;Gerald J. Zagury

  • Characterization and reactivity assessment of organic substrates for sulphate-reducing bacteria in acid mine drainage treatment.

    Gerald J. Zagury;Viktors I. Kulnieks;Carmen M. Neculita

  • A review of the implications and challenges of manganese removal from mine drainage.

    Carmen Mihaela Neculita;Eric Rosa

  • Biological treatment of highly contaminated acid mine drainage in batch reactors: Long-term treatment and reactive mixture characterization.

    Carmen Mihaela Neculita;GJ Zagury

  • Mercury speciation in highly contaminated soils from chlor-alkali plants using chemical extractions.

    Carmen-Mihaela Neculita;Gérald J Zagury;Louise Deschênes

  • Removal and potential recovery of rare earth elements from mine water

    A. Royer-Lavallée;C.M. Neculita;L. Coudert

  • Effectiveness of sulfate-reducing passive bioreactors for treating highly contaminated acid mine drainage: II. Metal removal mechanisms and potential mobility

    Carmen-Mihaela Neculita;Carmen-Mihaela Neculita;Gérald J. Zagury;Gérald J. Zagury;Bruno Bussière;Bruno Bussière

  • Recovery and reuse of sludge from active and passive treatment of mine drainage-impacted waters: a review

    Tsiverihasina V. Rakotonimaro;Carmen Mihaela Neculita;Bruno Bussière;Mostafa Benzaazoua

  • Biochemical passive reactors for treatment of acid mine drainage: Effect of hydraulic retention time on changes in efficiency, composition of reactive mixture, and microbial activity.

    Yaneth Vasquez;Maria C. Escobar;Carmen M. Neculita;Ziv Arbeli

  • Mercury fractionation, bioavailability, and ecotoxicity in highly contaminated soils from chlor-alkali plants

    Gerald J. Zagury;Carmen-Mihaela Neculita;Christian Bastien;Louise Deschênes

  • Bioelectrochemical treatment of acid mine drainage dominated with iron.

    Olivier Lefebvre;Carmen M. Neculita;Xiaodi Yue;How Yong Ng

  • Activated Biochar as an Effective Sorbent for Organic and Inorganic Contaminants in Water

    Flavia Lega Braghiroli;Hassine Bouafif;Carmen Mihaela Neculita;Ahmed Koubaa

  • Pilot-scale passive bioreactors for the treatment of acid mine drainage: Efficiency of mushroom compost vs. mixed substrates for metal removal

    Hocheol Song;Gil-Jae Yim;Sang-Woo Ji;Carmen Mihaela Neculita

  • Comparative effectiveness of mixed organic substrates to mushroom compost for treatment of mine drainage in passive bioreactors.

    Carmen Mihaela Neculita;Gil-Jae Yim;Gooyong Lee;Sang-Woo Ji

  • Effectiveness of sulfate-reducing passive bioreactors for treating highly contaminated acid mine drainage: I. Effect of hydraulic retention time

    Unknown

  • Treatment of As-rich mine effluents and produced residues stability: Current knowledge and research priorities for gold mining.

    L. Coudert;R. Bondu;T.V. Rakotonimaro;E. Rosa

  • Effect of hydraulic retention time on microbial community in biochemical passive reactors during treatment of acid mine drainage.

    Yaneth Vasquez;Maria C. Escobar;Johan S. Saenz;Maria F. Quiceno-Vallejo

  • Production, characterization, and potential of activated biochar as adsorbent for phenolic compounds from leachates in a lumber industry site.

    Flavia Lega Braghiroli;Hassine Bouafif;Nesrine Hamza;Carmen Mihaela Neculita

  • Performance of thermally activated dolomite for the treatment of Ni and Zn in contaminated neutral drainage.

    Iuliana Laura Calugaru;Carmen Mihaela Neculita;Thomas Genty;Bruno Bussière

  • Characterization of phosphate processing sludge from Tunisian mining basin and its potential valorization in fired bricks making

    M. Ettoumi;M. Jouini;C.M. Neculita;S. Bouhlel

Frequent Co-Authors

Bruno Bussière
Bruno Bussière Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue
Mostafa Benzaazoua
Mostafa Benzaazoua Mohammed VI Polytechnic University
Olivier Lefebvre
Olivier Lefebvre National University of Singapore
Jean-François Blais
Jean-François Blais Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Hocheol Song
Hocheol Song Hanyang University
John Molson
John Molson Université Laval
Alfonso Mucci
Alfonso Mucci McGill University
Catherine N. Mulligan
Catherine N. Mulligan Concordia University
Jong-In Han
Jong-In Han Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
How Yong Ng
How Yong Ng National University of Singapore

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in advancing their careers after studying Environmental Sciences in the USA, exploring related online degree options can be beneficial. Programs like the eds to edd bridge program offer a pathway for professionals seeking higher educational leadership roles, which can complement environmental policy and management careers.

For those focused on social impact and community well-being within environmental contexts, affordable programs such as the dsw programs provide advanced training in social work, addressing environmental justice and human health concerns.

If you are looking for flexibility or considering a shift into interdisciplinary studies, pursuing an online general studies degree affordable could be an ideal option. This degree allows students to customize coursework that integrates environmental sciences with other fields.

For those beginning their academic journey or seeking a less strenuous option, identifying the easiest bachelor degree to get can provide a practical entry point into higher education before specializing in environmental studies.

Best Scientists Citing Carmen Mihaela Neculita

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles