World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 43 7361 6865 3968 3607 116 5315

Jared M. Bruce publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jared M. Bruce between 2003 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jared M. Bruce published across 24 years, from 2003 to 2026, averaging 7 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2023. 15 of the 169 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2023. 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 4 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 14 publications 2026: 1 publication
2003 2026

169 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jared M. Bruce: publications per year, 2003 to 2026
Year Publications
2003 2
2004 2
2005 1
2006 1
2007 4
2008 4
2009 3
2010 5
2011 6
2012 4
2013 2
2014 10
2015 12
2016 14
2017 6
2018 13
2019 10
2020 10
2021 10
2022 7
2023 16
2024 12
2025 14
2026 1
Total 169
Download as CSV

Jared M. Bruce publications per year - data summary

  • Jared M. Bruce, a Psychology scholar from University of Missouri–Kansas City, has 169 publications recorded across 24 years, from 2003 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2003 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2023, with 16 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 2005, 2006 and 2026, with 1 publication each.
  • The rate of publication averages 7.0 papers per year over the whole span, or 7.0 per year counting only the 24 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 50 publications, 30% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2003-2010: 22 publications (2.8 per year); 2011-2018: 67 publications (8.4 per year); 2019-2026: 80 publications (10.0 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Jared M. Bruce publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jared M. Bruce sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 116 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 116
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jared M. Bruce publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Jared M. Bruce, a Psychology scholar from University of Missouri–Kansas City, records 116 publications - the 30th percentile of the discipline.
  • 30% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Jared M. Bruce, and about 70% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Jared M. Bruce ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Jared M. Bruce D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jared M. Bruce sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 43
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Jared M. Bruce D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Jared M. Bruce, a Psychology scholar from University of Missouri–Kansas City, records 43 D-Index - the 38th percentile of the discipline.
  • 38% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Jared M. Bruce, and about 62% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Jared M. Bruce ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Jared M. Bruce is affiliated with the University of Missouri-Kansas City in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a significant emphasis on pathology and forensic medicine, epidemiology, public health, environmental and occupational health, psychiatry and mental health, and emergency medicine.

The scientist's work covers several main topics, including:

  • Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
  • Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Sports injuries and prevention
  • Effects of Vibration on Health

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Jared M. Bruce include Ruben J. Echemendía, J. Cozart, Sharon Lynch, Catherine Siengsukon, and Joanie Thelen.

The researcher has published extensively in various scientific venues. The most common publication venues include:

  • Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
  • British Journal of Sports Medicine
  • Contemporary Clinical Trials
  • Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
  • JAMA Network Open

Selected recent papers by Jared M. Bruce include:

  • Introducing the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 6 (SCAT6), 2023, British Journal of Sports Medicine
  • Acute evaluation of sport-related concussion and implications for the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT6) for adults, adolescents and children: a systematic review, 2023, British Journal of Sports Medicine
  • A new look at an old test: Normative data of the symbol digit modalities test - Oral version, 2020, Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
  • Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 6 (SCAT6), 2023, British Journal of Sports Medicine
  • Tired of not knowing what that fatigue score means? Normative data of the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS), 2020, Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders

Best Publications

  • Treatment adherence in multiple sclerosis: association with emotional status, personality, and cognition

    Jared M. Bruce;Laura M. Hancock;Peter Arnett;Sharon Lynch

  • Robust relation between temporal discounting rates and body mass.

    David P. Jarmolowicz;J.Bradley C. Cherry;Derek D. Reed;Jared M. Bruce

  • Brain responses to food logos in obese and healthy weight children.

    Amanda S. Bruce;Rebecca J. Lepping;Jared M. Bruce;J. Bradley C. Cherry

  • Prospective clinical assessment using Sideline Concussion Assessment Tool-2 testing in the evaluation of sport-related concussion in college athletes.

    Margot Putukian;Ruben Echemendia;Annegret Dettwiler-Danspeckgruber;Tawny Duliba

  • Branding and a child’s brain: an fMRI study of neural responses to logos

    Amanda S. Bruce;Jared M. Bruce;William R. Black;Rebecca Jo Chambers Lepping

  • The Utility of Post-Concussion Neuropsychological Data in Identifying Cognitive Change Following Sports-Related MTBI in the Absence of Baseline Data

    Ruben J. Echemendia;Jared M. Bruce;Christopher M. Bailey;James Forrest Sanders

  • History of multiple self-reported concussions is not associated with reduced cognitive abilities.

    Jared M. Bruce;Ruben J. Echemendia

  • Burden among spousal and child caregivers of patients with mild cognitive impairment.

    Jared M. Bruce;Michael McQuiggan;Vanessa Williams;Holly Westervelt

  • Adherence to behavioural interventions in multiple sclerosis: Follow-up meeting report (AD@MS-2)

    Chris Heesen;Jared Bruce;Robert Gearing;Rona Moss-Morris

  • Delayed-onset deficits in verbal encoding strategies among patients with mild traumatic brain injury.

    Jared M. Bruce;Ruben J. Echemendia

  • Concussion history predicts self-reported symptoms before and following a concussive event

    Jared M. Bruce;Ruben J. Echemendia

  • Personality traits in multiple sclerosis: Association with mood and anxiety disorders

    Jared M. Bruce;Sharon G. Lynch

  • PTSD and cognitive symptoms relate to inhibition-related prefrontal activation and functional connectivity.

    Ashley N. Clausen;Ashley N. Clausen;Ashley N. Clausen;Alex J. Francisco;Joan Thelen;Jared Bruce

  • Objective adherence monitoring in multiple sclerosis: initial validation and association with self-report.

    Jared M Bruce;Laura M Hancock;Sharon G Lynch

  • Changes in brain activation to food pictures after adjustable gastric banding.

    Jared M. Bruce;Laura Hancock;Amanda Bruce;Rebecca J. Lepping

  • Processing speed and working memory training in multiple sclerosis: a double-blind randomized controlled pilot study.

    Laura M. Hancock;Jared M. Bruce;Amanda S. Bruce;Sharon G. Lynch

  • Mild visual acuity disturbances are associated with performance on tests of complex visual attention in MS.

    Jared M. Bruce;Amanda S. Bruce;Peter Andrew Arnett

  • 1 year test-retest reliability of ImPACT in professional ice hockey players.

    Jared Bruce;Ruben J. Echemendia;Willem Meeuwisse;Paul Comper

  • Calorie Labeling Promotes Dietary Self-Control by Shifting the Temporal Dynamics of Health- and Taste-Attribute Integration in Overweight Individuals:

    Seung-Lark Lim;Molly T Penrod;Oh-Ryeong Ha;Jared M Bruce

  • Response variability is associated with self-reported cognitive fatigue in multiple sclerosis.

    Jared M. Bruce;Amanda S. Bruce;Peter A. Arnett

  • Being Kind to Your Future Self: Probability Discounting of Health Decision-Making

    Jared M. Bruce;Amanda S. Bruce;Amanda S. Bruce;Delwyn Catley;Sharon Lynch

Frequent Co-Authors

Ruben J. Echemendia
Ruben J. Echemendia University of Missouri–Kansas City
Peter A. Arnett
Peter A. Arnett Pennsylvania State University
Willem H. Meeuwisse
Willem H. Meeuwisse University of Calgary
Delwyn Catley
Delwyn Catley Children's Mercy Hospital
David P. Jarmolowicz
David P. Jarmolowicz University of Kansas
Cary R. Savage
Cary R. Savage University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Derek D. Reed
Derek D. Reed University of Kansas
W. Kyle Simmons
W. Kyle Simmons Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences
John DeLuca
John DeLuca Kessler Foundation
Nancy D. Chiaravalloti
Nancy D. Chiaravalloti Kessler Foundation

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree in the USA offers diverse options for online study and career advancement. Many prospective students wonder if you can get a job with an online psychology degree; the good news is that respected, accredited online programs can provide pathways to successful employment, although licensure and practical requirements should always be considered.

Choosing between a BA or BS in Psychology is another important decision. Your choice may affect your focus of study and future job prospects, with BA programs often emphasizing a broader liberal arts education and BS options leaning more toward research and science.

Advances in distance learning also allow students to pursue accelerated options such as accelerated online psyd programs, helping graduates complete advanced degrees more quickly and begin clinical or research-based careers sooner.

Graduates may follow diverse paths, from clinical practice and counseling to specialized fields like what is a forensic psychologist, which combines psychological expertise with the legal system. Each pathway offers unique challenges and rewards, making psychology a versatile and valuable field for online learners.

Best Scientists Citing Jared M. Bruce

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles