World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Belinda Borrelli

Belinda Borrelli

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 54 4549 4209 2529 2287 232 12809

Belinda Borrelli publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Belinda Borrelli between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Belinda Borrelli published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 9.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2021. 24 of the 315 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2021. 1992: 3 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 16 publications 2025: 8 publications
1992 2025

315 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Belinda Borrelli: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 3
1993 0
1994 3
1995 4
1996 8
1997 4
1998 9
1999 8
2000 5
2001 7
2002 10
2003 9
2004 8
2005 10
2006 9
2007 11
2008 15
2009 8
2010 13
2011 14
2012 13
2013 11
2014 7
2015 10
2016 12
2017 10
2018 7
2019 4
2020 7
2021 20
2022 17
2023 15
2024 16
2025 8
Total 315
Download as CSV

Belinda Borrelli publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Belinda Borrelli sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 231–240 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 232 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226 232
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Belinda Borrelli D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Belinda Borrelli sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408 54
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Belinda Borrelli is affiliated with Boston University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a focus on health professions, physiology, applied psychology, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, and surgery. Their research spans multiple subfields, demonstrating a multidisciplinary approach to health and behavioral sciences.

The scientist's work addresses various topics including mobile health and mHealth applications, smoking behavior and cessation, behavioral health and interventions, physical activity and health, osteoarthritis treatment and mechanisms, total knee arthroplasty outcomes, and digital mental health interventions.

Frequent publication venues include:

  • Circulation
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
  • Community Dentistry And Oral Epidemiology
  • Addictive Behaviors

Recent papers published by Belinda Borrelli feature:

  • "Association of Habitual Physical Activity With Cardiovascular Disease Risk," 2020, Circulation Research
  • "Factors associated with long-term use of digital devices in the electronic Framingham Heart Study," 2022, npj Digital Medicine
  • "Adherence of Mobile App-Based Surveys and Comparison With Traditional Surveys: eCohort Study," 2021, Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • "Theoretical and methodological approaches in designing, developing, and delivering interventions for oral health behaviour change," 2023, Community Dentistry And Oral Epidemiology
  • "Methods used to quit vaping among adolescents and associations with perceived risk, addiction, and socio-economic status," 2023, Addictive Behaviors

Belinda Borrelli has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Joanne M. Murabito
  • Yuankai Zhang
  • Emelia J. Benjamin
  • Chathurangi H Pathiravasan
  • David D. McManus

Their work mainly emphasizes the integration of behavioral science and digital technology to promote health interventions, with particular attention to areas such as smoking cessation and physical activity.

Belinda Borrelli was awarded the Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2013.

Best Publications

  • Enhancing Treatment Fidelity in Health Behavior Change Studies: Best Practices and Recommendations From the NIH Behavior Change Consortium.

    Albert J. Bellg;Belinda Borrelli;Barbara Resnick;Jacki Hecht

  • The Assessment, Monitoring, and Enhancement of Treatment Fidelity In Public Health Clinical Trials

    Belinda Borrelli

  • A new tool to assess treatment fidelity and evaluation of treatment fidelity across 10 years of health behavior research

    Belinda Borrelli;Deborah Sepinwall;Denise Ernst;Albert J. Bellg

  • Motivational interviewing in health promotion: it sounds like something is changing.

    Ken Resnicow;Colleen DiIorio;Johanna E. Soet;Belinda Borrelli

  • History of depression and smoking cessation outcome: a meta-analysis.

    Brian Hitsman;Belinda Borrelli;Dennis E. McChargue;Bonnie Spring

  • A Theory of Physical Activity Maintenance

    Claudio R. Nigg;Belinda Borrelli;Jay Maddock;Rod K. Dishman

  • Examples of implementation and evaluation of treatment fidelity in the BCC studies: Where we are and where we need to go

    Barbara Resnick;Albert J. Bellg;Belinda Borrelli;Carol DeFrancesco

  • Predicting treatment adherence in obstructive sleep apnea using principles of behavior change.

    Mark S. Aloia;J. Todd Arnedt;Carl Stepnowsky;Jackie Hecht;Jackie Hecht

  • The role of weight concern and self-efficacy in smoking cessation and weight gain among smokers in a clinic-based cessation program.

    Belinda Borrelli;Robin Mermelstein

  • Exercise effects on withdrawal and mood among women attempting smoking cessation.

    Beth C Bock;Bess H Marcus;Teresa K King;Belinda Borrelli

  • Past major depression and smoking cessation outcome: A systematic review and meta-analysis update

    Brian Hitsman;George D. Papandonatos;Dennis E. McChargue;Andrew Demott

  • The impact of depression on smoking cessation in women

    Belinda Borrelli;Beth Bock;Teresa King;Bernardine Pinto

  • Risk perception and smoking behavior in medically ill smokers: a prospective study

    Belinda Borrelli;Rashelle B. Hayes;Shira Dunsiger;Joseph L. Fava

  • Predictors of quitting and dropout among women in a clinic-based smoking cessation program.

    B. Borrelli;J. Hogan;B. Bock;B. Pinto

  • Electronic cigarettes: achieving a balanced perspective.

    Theodore L. Wagener;Michael Siegel;Belinda Borrelli

  • Brief motivational interviewing as a clinical strategy to promote asthma medication adherence.

    Belinda Borrelli;Kristin A. Riekert;Andrew Weinstein;Lucille Rathier

  • Randomized controlled trial to improve care for urban children with asthma: results of the School-Based Asthma Therapy trial.

    Jill S. Halterman;Peter G. Szilagyi;Susan G. Fisher;Maria Fagnano

  • Development of Major Depressive Disorder During Smoking-Cessation Treatment

    Belinda Borrelli;Raymond Niaura;Nancy J. Keuthen;Michael G. Goldstein

  • Motivational Interviewing for Parent-Child health interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Belinda Borrelli;Erin M Tooley;Lori A J Scott-Sheldon

  • Perceptions of barriers and facilitators: self-management decisions by older adolescents and adults with CF.

    Maureen George;Devin Rand-Giovannetti;Michelle N. Eakin;Belinda Borrelli

  • . The Role of Weight Concern and Self-Efficacy in Smoking Cessation and Weight Gain.

    B. Borrelli;R. Mermelstein;W.G. Shadel

Frequent Co-Authors

Raymond Niaura
Raymond Niaura New York University
David B. Abrams
David B. Abrams New York University
Bess H. Marcus
Bess H. Marcus Brown University
Bonnie Spring
Bonnie Spring Northwestern University
Robin J. Mermelstein
Robin J. Mermelstein University of Illinois at Chicago
Shira Dunsiger
Shira Dunsiger Brown University
George D. Papandonatos
George D. Papandonatos Brown University
Beth C. Bock
Beth C. Bock Brown University
Brian Hitsman
Brian Hitsman Northwestern University
Christopher J. Armitage
Christopher J. Armitage University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees in the USA opens up a range of career pathways, from mental health services to organizational leadership. A common concern for many students is finding high-quality, affordable programs that fit their budget and schedule.

Fortunately, many universities now offer lower-cost online degrees. For those aiming to reduce tuition fees, consider the cheapest psychology programs in Boca Raton, which combine affordability with a comprehensive curriculum. Similarly, students in Massachusetts can find affordable psychology degrees in Boston—ideal for anyone prioritizing cost and quality.

California also boasts a range of affordable psychology programs in California that cater to both in-state and out-of-state learners. Meanwhile, those interested in studying in the Southeast have access to the cheapest psychology programs in Florida, which provide flexible online options as well.

Graduates can pursue careers in counseling, social work, human resources, education, and more. By choosing an affordable and reputable program, students can maximize their investment and prepare for diverse careers in psychology and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Belinda Borrelli

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles