World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 40 1646 1541 52 50 121 9852

Ingrid Verheul publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ingrid Verheul between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ingrid Verheul published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 4.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2002. 2 of the 126 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2002. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 6 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 2 publications
1999 2025

126 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ingrid Verheul: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 6
2001 5
2002 11
2003 6
2004 4
2005 3
2006 6
2007 10
2008 7
2009 6
2010 6
2011 7
2012 8
2013 4
2014 2
2015 6
2016 11
2017 5
2018 4
2019 2
2020 2
2021 2
2022 0
2023 0
2024 0
2025 2
Total 126
Download as CSV

Ingrid Verheul publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ingrid Verheul sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 120–124 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 121 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112 121
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Ingrid Verheul D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ingrid Verheul sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81 40
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Ingrid Verheul is affiliated with Erasmus University Rotterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on psychology, with particular attention to the intersections of entrepreneurship and mental health.

The main fields of study associated with their work include:

  • Psychology

Within this broad area, subfields of study explored by Verheul encompass:

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Psychiatry and Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Economics and Econometrics

The core topics addressed in their research involve:

  • Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
  • Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Emotional Intelligence and Performance
  • Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research

Verheul has contributed to several recent publications, including:

  • "Narcissism and entrepreneurship: Evidence from six datasets," 2020, Journal of Business Venturing Insights
  • "Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Symptoms and Entrepreneurial Orientation: A Replication Note," 2020, Applied Psychology
  • "Entrepreneurship, Clinical Psychology, and Mental Health: An Exciting and Promising New Field of Research," 2020, Academy of Management Perspectives
  • "Temporal Focus and Entrepreneurial Orientation of Solo Self-Employed Workers," 2025, SSRN Electronic Journal

The venues where Verheul frequently publishes include:

  • Journal of Business Venturing Insights
  • Applied Psychology
  • Academy of Management Perspectives
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Their research collaborations involve work with a number of co-authors, most notably:

  • Roy Thurik
  • Katsuyuki Kamei
  • Olivier Torrès
  • Yik Kiu Leung
  • Ingmar H. A. Franken

Best Publications

  • An eclectic theory of entrepreneurship: policies, institutions and culture

    Roy Thurik;Sander Wennekers;Ingrid Verheul;David Audretsch

  • Entrepreneurship and role models

    Niels Bosma;Jolanda Hessels;Veronique Schutjens;Mirjam Van Praag

  • Start-Up Capital: "Does Gender Matter?"

    Ingrid Verheul;Roy Thurik

  • Explaining female and male entrepreneurship at the country level

    Ingrid Verheul;André J. van Stel;A. Roy Thurik

  • Factors influencing the entrepreneurial engagement of opportunity and necessity entrepreneurs

    Peter van der Zwan;Roy Thurik;Ingrid Verheul;Jolanda Hessels

  • Entrepreneurship : determinants and policy in a European-US comparison

    David Audretsch;Roy Thurik;Ingrid Verheul;Sander Wennekers

  • An Eclectic Theory of Entrepreneurship: Policies, Institutions and Culture

    Ingrid Verheul;Sander Wennekers;Sander Wennekers;David Audretsch;David Audretsch;Roy Thurik;Roy Thurik

  • Explaining preferences and actual involvement in self-employment: Gender and the entrepreneurial personality

    Ingrid Verheul;Roy Thurik;Isabel Grilo;Isabel Grilo;Peter van der Zwan

  • Business accomplishments, gender and entrepreneurial self-image

    Ingrid Verheul;Lorraine Uhlaner;Roy Thurik

  • What Makes Entrepreneurs Happy? Determinants of Satisfaction Among Founders

    Martin A. Carree;Ingrid Verheul

  • Get it Together! Synergistic Effects of Causal and Effectual Decision–Making Logics on Venture Performance

    Unknown

  • ADHD-like behavior and entrepreneurial intentions

    Ingrid Verheul;Joern Block;Joern Block;Katrin Burmeister-Lamp;Roy Thurik

  • The entrepreneurial ladder, gender, and regional development

    Peter van der Zwan;Ingrid Verheul;A. Roy Thurik

  • Explaining engagement levels of opportunity and necessity entrepreneurs

    R. Bhola;Ingrid Verheul;Roy Thurik;Isabel Grilo

  • Get It Together! Synergistic Effects of Causal and Effectual Decision-Making Logics on Venture Performance

    Katrin M. Smolka;Ingrid Verheul;Katrin Burmeister‐Lamp;Pursey P.M.A.R. Heugens

  • Early Development of Entrepreneurial Qualities: the Role of Initial Education

    Isobel van der Kuip;Ingrid Verheul

  • Gender Differences in Strategy and Human Resource Management: The Case of Dutch Real Estate Brokerage

    Ingrid Verheul;Peter Risseeuw;Gaby Bartelse

  • What determines the growth ambition of Dutch early-stage entrepreneurs?

    Ingrid Verheul;Linda van Mil

  • Factors Influencing the Entrepreneurial Engagement of Opportunity and Necessity Entrepreneurs

    Roy Thurik;Ingrid Verheul;Jolanda Hessels;Peter van der Zwan

  • Allocation and Productivity of Time in New Ventures of Female and Male Entrepreneurs

    Ingrid Verheul;Martin A. Carree;A. Roy Thurik;A. Roy Thurik

  • Is there a (fe)male approach? Understanding gender differences in entrepreneurship

    Ingrid Verheul

  • Explaining Female and Male Entrepreneurship at the Country Level

    Ingrid Verheul;Ingrid Verheul;André van Stel;Roy Thurik

  • ADHD-like behavior and entrepreneurial intentions

    I. Verheul;J.H. Block;K. Burmeister-Lamp;A.R. Thurik

Frequent Co-Authors

Roy Thurik
Roy Thurik Montpellier Business School
Martin Carree
Martin Carree Maastricht University
André van Stel
André van Stel Kozminski University
Enrico Santarelli
Enrico Santarelli University of Bologna
David B. Audretsch
David B. Audretsch Indiana University
Mirjam van Praag
Mirjam van Praag Copenhagen Business School
Niels Bosma
Niels Bosma Utrecht University
Lorraine Uhlaner
Lorraine Uhlaner EDHEC Business School
Henning Tiemeier
Henning Tiemeier Harvard University
Ingmar H.A. Franken
Ingmar H.A. Franken Erasmus University Rotterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Business and Management in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degree options that can boost your career. If you’re looking for specialized fields, you’ll find flexible, affordable programs designed to fit your goals and schedule.

For those interested in finance, the easiest online accounting degree options provide a solid foundation in accounting principles and business processes. Tech-savvy students can consider the best online ai degree programs to stay ahead in an increasingly data-driven world.

If you’re drawn to managing large-scale projects and infrastructure, online construction management degrees prepare you for leadership roles in the booming construction sector. For professionals seeking to advance into executive leadership, an emba online can be a game changer, offering rigorous business education with added flexibility.

Each pathway delivers valuable skills tailored for today’s business landscape. With so many online degrees available, you can find a program that aligns with your interests and career ambitions—all while enjoying the flexibility of remote learning.

Best Scientists Citing Ingrid Verheul

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles