World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 69 2312 2111 1346 1201 233 60657

Robin J. Mermelstein publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Robin J. Mermelstein between 1980 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Robin J. Mermelstein published across 45 years, from 1980 to 2024, averaging 5.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2013. 1 of the 244 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2013. 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 4 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 3 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 4 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 3 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 22 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
1980 2024

244 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Robin J. Mermelstein: publications per year, 1980 to 2024
Year Publications
1980 1
1981 0
1982 1
1983 4
1984 0
1985 1
1986 3
1987 0
1988 1
1989 0
1990 0
1991 1
1992 4
1993 3
1994 4
1995 5
1996 5
1997 1
1998 2
1999 4
2000 3
2001 1
2002 3
2003 6
2004 7
2005 4
2006 5
2007 9
2008 6
2009 11
2010 8
2011 9
2012 17
2013 22
2014 8
2015 14
2016 20
2017 7
2018 10
2019 8
2020 10
2021 13
2022 2
2023 0
2024 1
Total 244
Download as CSV

Robin J. Mermelstein publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robin J. Mermelstein sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 231–240 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 233 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226 233
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Robin J. Mermelstein D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robin J. Mermelstein sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 68–69 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219 69
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Robin J. Mermelstein is a researcher affiliated with the University of Illinois at Chicago in the United States. Their work primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a focus on subfields such as Physiology, Pharmacology, Literature and Literary Theory, Applied Psychology, and Epidemiology.

The research contributions of Mermelstein cover various topics, primarily examining Smoking Behavior and Cessation, Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research, Media Influence and Health, Behavioral Health and Interventions, Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes, Spam and Phishing Detection, and Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet.

Some of the recent publications authored or coauthored by Mermelstein include the following:

  • "Tailored text message and web intervention for smoking cessation in U.S. socioeconomically-disadvantaged young adults: A randomized controlled trial," 2022, Preventive Medicine
  • "Impact of alcohol and drug use on smoking and cessation in socioeconomically disadvantaged young adults," 2020, Addictive Behaviors
  • "Understanding the Dynamics between Vaping and Cannabis Legalization Using Twitter Opinions," 2021, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • ""Smoker" and "Vaper" identity in people who use both cigarettes and E-cigarettes: Changes over time and associations with smoking behaviors," 2024, Journal of Addictive Diseases

Mermelstein frequently collaborates with several coauthors, who include:

  • Andrea C. Villanti
  • Catherine Peasley-Miklus
  • Julia C. West
  • Darren Mays
  • Stephen T. Higgins

The main publication venues for their work are:

  • Preventive Medicine
  • Addictive Behaviors
  • Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • Journal of Addictive Diseases

Best Publications

  • A global measure of perceived stress.

    Sheldon Cohen;Thomas W. Kamarck;Robin J. Mermelstein

  • Measuring the Functional Components of Social Support

    Sheldon Cohen;Robin J. Mermelstein;Thomas W. Kamarck;Harry M. Hoberman

  • A Practical Guide to Calculating Cohen’s f2, a Measure of Local Effect Size, from PROC MIXED

    Arielle S. Selya;Jennifer S. Rose;Lisa C. Dierker;Donald Hedeker

  • Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task?

    William T Riley;Daniel E Rivera;Audie A Atienza;Wendy Nilsen

  • Sex differences in adolescent depression: stress exposure and reactivity models.

    Benjamin L. Hankin;Robin Mermelstein;Linda Roesch

  • Development of a Definition of Postacute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

    Unknown

  • Social support and smoking cessation and maintenance.

    Robin J. Mermelstein;Sheldon Cohen;Edward Lichtenstein;John S. Baer

  • Relapse and maintenance issues for smoking cessation.

    Judith K. Ockene;Karen M. Emmons;Robin J. Mermelstein;Kenneth A. Perkins

  • Partner support and relapse in smoking-cessation programs.

    Robin Mermelstein;Edward Lichtenstein;Karen McIntyre

  • The multiphase optimization strategy for engineering effective tobacco use interventions.

    Linda M. Collins;Timothy B. Baker;Robin J. Mermelstein;Megan E. Piper

  • Cognitive Theories of Depression in Children and Adolescents: A Conceptual and Quantitative Review

    Zia Lakdawalla;Benjamin L. Hankin;Robin J. Mermelstein

  • An Application of a Mixed‐Effects Location Scale Model for Analysis of Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) Data

    Donald Hedeker;Robin J. Mermelstein;Hakan Demirtas

  • Changing knowledge and attitudes about skin cancer risk factors in adolescents.

    Robin J. Mermelstein;Lee A. Riesenberg

  • Balancing Consideration of the Risks and Benefits of E-Cigarettes

    David J. K. Balfour;Neal L. Benowitz;Suzanne M. Colby;Dorothy K. Hatsukami

  • Self-efficacy and relapse in smoking cessation: a replication and extension.

    K. O. McIntyre;Edward Lichtenstein;Robin J. Mermelstein

  • Individual and contextual influences on adolescent smoking.

    Lindsey Turner;Robin J. Mermelstein;Brian Flay

  • Teen smoking cessation

    Robin J. Mermelstein

  • The role of weight concern and self-efficacy in smoking cessation and weight gain among smokers in a clinic-based cessation program.

    Belinda Borrelli;Robin Mermelstein

  • Modeling between-subject and within-subject variances in ecological momentary assessment data using mixed-effects location scale models

    Donald Hedeker;Robin J. Mermelstein;Hakan Demirtas

  • New Methods for Tobacco Dependence Treatment Research

    Timothy B. Baker;Robin Mermelstein;Linda M. Collins;Megan E. Piper

  • Methodological issues in measuring treatment outcome in adolescent smoking cessation studies.

    Robin Mermelstein;Suzanne M. Colby;Christi Patten;Alexandre V Prokhorov

Frequent Co-Authors

Donald Hedeker
Donald Hedeker University of Chicago
Timothy B. Baker
Timothy B. Baker University of Wisconsin–Madison
Linda M. Collins
Linda M. Collins New York University
Michael C. Fiore
Michael C. Fiore University of Wisconsin–Madison
Lisa Dierker
Lisa Dierker Wesleyan University
Belinda Borrelli
Belinda Borrelli Boston University
Brian R. Flay
Brian R. Flay Boise State University
Daniel M. Bolt
Daniel M. Bolt University of Wisconsin–Madison
Lauren S. Wakschlag
Lauren S. Wakschlag Northwestern University
Wei-Yin Loh
Wei-Yin Loh University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens the door to a variety of online degree programs and professional pathways. One of the most popular career choices is social work, which requires specific educational credentials depending on the state where you plan to practice.

For example, if you’re interested in becoming a social worker in the Mountain West, it’s essential to know the degree needed to be a social worker in Montana. Similarly, aspiring professionals must meet the Nebraska minimum degree requirement for social workers, which can differ from neighboring states.

In Nevada, the Nevada minimum degree requirement for social workers outlines the academic paths needed for licensure and successful job placement. Likewise, the social worker degree requirements in New Hampshire detail state-specific guidelines for those seeking to make a positive impact through social work.

Online psychology degrees can be the first step toward these rewarding careers, providing flexibility and foundational skills to meet various state and industry standards. Be sure to research local requirements to ensure your chosen program aligns with your professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Robin J. Mermelstein

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles