World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 49 5608 5207 3058 2771 118 12153

Lisa Dierker publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lisa Dierker between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lisa Dierker published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 4.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2018. 5 of the 129 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2018. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 5 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 6 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 5 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 4 publications 2025: 1 publication
1996 2025

129 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lisa Dierker: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 1
1998 5
1999 4
2000 0
2001 6
2002 4
2003 0
2004 2
2005 1
2006 2
2007 10
2008 12
2009 8
2010 6
2011 4
2012 9
2013 6
2014 1
2015 6
2016 7
2017 3
2018 13
2019 1
2020 5
2021 4
2022 2
2023 1
2024 4
2025 1
Total 129
Download as CSV

Lisa Dierker publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa Dierker sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 118 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 118
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Lisa Dierker D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa Dierker sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487 49
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Lisa Dierker is affiliated with Wesleyan University in the United States. Their research spans primarily the fields of psychology and mathematics, with significant focus on statistics and probability as well as clinical psychology and physiology.

The scientist's work addresses various subfields including:

  • Statistics and Probability
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Physiology
  • Education
  • Pharmacology

The main topics covered in their research include:

  • Statistics Education and Methodologies
  • Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Educational Assessment and Pedagogy

Dierker's publications appear frequently in a range of scholarly venues, reflecting a combination of education, psychology, and public health interests. Notable publication venues include:

  • Statistics Education Research Journal
  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine
  • Tobacco Control
  • Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education
  • Journal for Research in Mathematics Education

Some of the recent papers from this scientist are:

  • "Trends in U.S. Depression Prevalence From 2015 to 2020: The Widening Treatment Gap" (2022), American Journal of Preventive Medicine
  • "Cigarette dependence is more prevalent and increasing among US adolescents and adults who use cannabis, 2002-2019" (2021), Tobacco Control
  • "COMPARISON OF FUTURE COURSE ENROLLMENT AMONG STUDENTS COMPLETING ONE OF FOUR DIFFERENT INTRODUCTORY STATISTICS COURSES" (2020), Statistics Education Research Journal
  • "TAKING PROJECT-BASED STATISTICS ABROAD: LEARNING EXPERIENCES AND OUTCOMES OF A PROJECT-BASED STATISTICS COURSE IN WEST AFRICA" (2020), Statistics Education Research Journal
  • "Behavioral symptoms of eating disorders among adopted adolescents and young adults in the United States: Findings from the Add Health survey" (2020), International Journal of Eating Disorders

The scientist has collaborated with several frequent co-authors, including:

  • Jennifer Rose
  • Valerie Nazzaro
  • Arielle Selya
  • Renée D. Goodwin
  • Andrea H. Weinberger

Best Publications

  • A Practical Guide to Calculating Cohen’s f2, a Measure of Local Effect Size, from PROC MIXED

    Arielle S. Selya;Jennifer S. Rose;Lisa C. Dierker;Donald Hedeker

  • Characteristics and functions of non-suicidal self-injury in a community sample of adolescents

    Elizabeth E. Lloyd-Richardson;Nicholas Perrine;L. Dierker;Michelle L. Kelley

  • Use and abuse of alcohol and illicit drugs in US adolescents: results of the National Comorbidity Survey-Adolescent Supplement.

    Joel Swendsen;Marcy Burstein;Brady Case;Kevin P. Conway

  • Does number of lifetime traumas explain the relationship between PTSD and chronic medical conditions? Answers from the National Comorbidity Survey-Replication (NCS-R)

    Eve M. Sledjeski;Brittany Speisman;Lisa C. Dierker

  • A Time-Varying Effect Model for Intensive Longitudinal Data

    Xianming Tan;Mariya P. Shiyko;Runze Li;Yuelin Li

  • Evaluating the drug use “gateway” theory using cross-national data: Consistency and associations of the order of initiation of drug use among participants in the WHO World Mental Health Surveys

    Louisa Degenhardt;Lisa Dierker;Lisa Dierker;Wai Tat Chiu;Maria Elena Medina-Mora

  • Psychopathology among offspring of parents with substance abuse and/or anxiety disorders: a high-risk study

    Kathleen R. Merikangas;Lisa C. Dierker;Peter Szatmari

  • Vulnerability factors among children at risk for anxiety disorders

    Kathleen Ries Merikangas;Shelli Avenevoli;Lisa Dierker;Lisa Dierker;Christian Grillon

  • Smoking and Depression: An Examination of Mechanisms of Comorbidity

    Lisa C. Dierker;Shelli Avenevoli;Marilyn Stolar;K.R. Merikangas

  • Screening for Anxiety and Depression in Early Adolescence

    Lisa C. Dierker;Anne Marie Albano;Gregory N. Clarke;Richard G. Heimberg

  • The MacArthur Three-City Outcome Study: Evaluating Multi-Informant Measures of Young Children’s Symptomatology

    Jennifer C. Ablow;Jeffrey R. Measelle;Helena C. Kraemer;Richard Harrington

  • Influence of parental concordance for psychiatric disorders on psychopathology in offspring.

    Lisa C. Dierker;Kathleen R. Merikangas;Peter Szatmari

  • Fear-potentiated startle in adolescent offspring of parents with anxiety disordersf ☆

    Christian Grillon;Lisa Dierker;Kathleen R Merikangas

  • Comorbidity of depression in children and adolescents: models and evidence from a prospective high-risk family study.

    Shelli Avenevoli;Marilyn Stolar;Julia Li;Lisa Dierker

  • Disordered eating and substance use in high-school students: Results from the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System

    Emily M. Pisetsky;Y. May Chao;Lisa C. Dierker;Alexis M. May

  • Startle modulation in children at risk for anxiety disorders and/or alcoholism.

    Christian Grillon;Lisa Dierker;Kathleen R. Merikangas

  • The interpretation of statistical power after the data have been gathered

    John Joseph Dziak;Lisa C. Dierker;Lisa C. Dierker;Beau Abar

  • Association Between Psychiatric Disorders and the Progression of Tobacco Use Behaviors

    Lisa C. Dierker;Shelli Avenevoli;Kathleen R. Merikangas;Brian P. Flaherty

  • Trends in Daily Cannabis Use Among Cigarette Smokers: United States, 2002–2014

    Renee D. Goodwin;Lauren R. Pacek;Jan Copeland;Scott J. Moeller

  • Mental disorders as risk factors for later substance dependence: estimates of optimal prevention and treatment benefits.

    Meyer D. Glantz;James C. Anthony;Patricia A. Berglund;Louisa Degenhardt

  • Does the 'gateway' matter? Associations between the order of drug use initiation and the development of drug dependence in the National Comorbidity Study Replication.

    L. Degenhardt;W. T. Chiu;K. Conway;L. Dierker

  • The proximal association between smoking and alcohol use among first year college students

    Lisa Dierker;Elizabeth Lloyd-Richardson;Marilyn Stolar;Brian Flay

Frequent Co-Authors

Kathleen R. Merikangas
Kathleen R. Merikangas National Institutes of Health
Robin J. Mermelstein
Robin J. Mermelstein University of Illinois at Chicago
Donald Hedeker
Donald Hedeker University of Chicago
Renee D. Goodwin
Renee D. Goodwin City University of New York
Joel Swendsen
Joel Swendsen University of Bordeaux
Ronald C. Kessler
Ronald C. Kessler Harvard University
Louisa Degenhardt
Louisa Degenhardt University of New South Wales
Eric C. Donny
Eric C. Donny Wake Forest University
Kevin P. Conway
Kevin P. Conway National Institute on Drug Abuse
Glorisa Canino
Glorisa Canino University of Puerto Rico

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens multiple career pathways in mental health and counseling. One popular professional track is becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT). Each state has distinct education and licensing requirements, so it’s essential to research your desired location.

For example, those aiming to meet mft requirements in Long Beach will need to complete a relevant graduate degree, accrue supervised clinical hours, and pass national and state exams. Similarly, understanding the Los Angeles mft certification requirements is vital for anyone planning to practice in California’s largest city.

Outside California, requirements may vary. If you’re interested in how to become an MFT in a different region, it’s essential to check local regulations. Learn more about how to become an mft in Louisville or how to become an mft in Lubbock to see different state processes.

An online psychology degree can be a flexible, accessible launchpad into these rewarding fields, providing the foundational skills needed for licensure and career advancement as a counselor or therapist.

Best Scientists Citing Lisa Dierker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles