World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
83
Citations
31585
World Ranking
304
National Ranking
139

Donald Hedeker publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donald Hedeker sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 337 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Donald Hedeker D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donald Hedeker sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2000 - Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA)

Overview

Donald Hedeker is affiliated with the University of Chicago in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields within medicine and psychology, with particular focus on physiology, public health, environmental and occupational health, developmental and educational psychology, applied psychology, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

Their extensive body of work covers a variety of main topics, including obesity, physical activity, and diet; children's physical and motor development; behavioral health and interventions; mental health research topics; physical activity and health; smoking behavior and cessation; and statistical methods and Bayesian inference.

Recent publications by Donald Hedeker include:

  • Centering categorical predictors in multilevel models: Best practices and interpretation, 2021, Psychological Methods
  • Effect of early mobilisation on long-term cognitive impairment in critical illness in the USA: a randomised controlled trial, 2023, The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
  • Criterion validity and relationships between alternative hierarchical dimensional models of general and specific psychopathology, 2020, Journal of Abnormal Psychology
  • A Factorial Experiment to Optimize Remotely Delivered Behavioral Treatment for Obesity: Results of the Opt-IN Study, 2020, Obesity
  • Impact of post-diagnosis weight change on survival outcomes in Black and White breast cancer patients, 2021, Breast Cancer Research

Donald Hedeker frequently collaborates with a set of co-authors, including José Maia, Peter T. Katzmarzyk, Go Tani, Sara Pereira, and Rui Garganta. These collaborations have contributed to a diverse research portfolio.

Their works are often published in journals such as Revista Portuguesa de Ciências do Desporto, American Journal of Human Biology, Nicotine & Tobacco Research, Statistics in Medicine, and Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise.

Donald Hedeker was recognized as a Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA) in the year 2000.

Best Publications

  • Longitudinal Data Analysis

    Donald R. Hedeker;Robert D. Gibbons

  • A Practical Guide to Calculating Cohen’s f2, a Measure of Local Effect Size, from PROC MIXED

    Arielle S. Selya;Jennifer S. Rose;Lisa C. Dierker;Donald Hedeker

  • Time-related predictors of suicide in major affective disorder

    Jan Fawcett;William A. Scheftner;Louis Fogg;David C. Clark

  • Mobile health technology evaluation: The mHealth evidence workshop

    Santosh Kumar;Wendy J. Nilsen;Amy Abernethy;Audie Atienza

  • Application of Random-Effects Pattern-Mixture Models for Missing Data in Longitudinal Studies

    Donald Hedeker;Robert D. Gibbons

  • Some conceptual and statistical issues in analysis of longitudinal psychiatric data. Application to the NIMH treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program dataset.

    Robert D. Gibbons;Donald R. Hedeker;Irene Elkin;Christine Waternaux

  • The Altman Self-Rating Mania Scale

    Edward G. Altman;Donald Hedeker;James L. Peterson;John M. Davis

  • A random-effects ordinal regression model for multilevel analysis.

    Donald Hedeker;Robert D. Gibbons

  • Full-information item bi-factor analysis

    Robert D. Gibbons;Donald R. Hedeker

  • Differential influence of parental smoking and friends' smoking on adolescent initiation and escalation of smoking.

    B R Flay;F B Hu;O Siddiqui;L E Day

  • MIXOR: a computer program for mixed-effects ordinal regression analysis

    Donald Hedeker;Robert D. Gibbons

  • Advances in Analysis of Longitudinal Data

    Robert D. Gibbons;Donald Hedeker;Stephen DuToit

  • Clinical predictors of suicide in patients with major affective disorders: a controlled prospective study.

    Jan Fawcett;William Scheftner;David Clark;Don Hedeker

  • Sample Size Estimation for Longitudinal Designs with Attrition: Comparing Time-Related Contrasts Between Two Groups

    Donald Hedeker;Robert D. Gibbons;Christine Waternaux

  • Comparison of Population-Averaged and Subject-Specific Approaches for Analyzing Repeated Binary Outcomes

    Frank B. Hu;Jack Goldberg;Donald Hedeker;Brian R. Flay

  • Effective medical treatment of opiate addiction

    L. L. Judd;M. G. Marston;C. Attkisson;W. Berrettini

  • Initial Severity and Differential Treatment Outcome in the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program

    Irene Elkin;Robert D. Gibbons;M. Tracie Shea;Stuart M. Sotsky

  • A mixed-effects multinomial logistic regression model.

    Donald Hedeker

  • Full-Information Item Bifactor Analysis of Graded Response Data:

    Robert D. Gibbons;R. Darrell Bock;Donald Hedeker;David J. Weiss

  • Random-effects regression models for clustered data with an example from smoking prevention research.

    Donald Hedeker;Robert D. Gibbons;Brian R. Flay

Frequent Co-Authors

Robin J. Mermelstein
Robin J. Mermelstein University of Illinois at Chicago
Bonnie Spring
Bonnie Spring Northwestern University
Robert D. Gibbons
Robert D. Gibbons University of Chicago
Brian R. Flay
Brian R. Flay Boise State University
Peter T. Katzmarzyk
Peter T. Katzmarzyk Pennington Biomedical Research Center
Lisa Dierker
Lisa Dierker Wesleyan University
John M. Davis
John M. Davis University of Illinois at Chicago
Andrew C. Leon
Andrew C. Leon Cornell University
Genevieve F. Dunton
Genevieve F. Dunton University of Southern California
Frank B. Hu
Frank B. Hu Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Social Sciences and Humanities online unlocks many flexible career routes. Students often seek online masters to fast-track their education and enter or advance in fields like counseling, education, or human services. These programs allow for specialization while balancing other life commitments.

For those wanting an accelerated experience, an accelerated bachelor's degree online can help you graduate faster and join the workforce sooner. Many programs offer transfer credit options and flexible schedules, catering to adult learners or career changers.

Popular pathways include social work, and finding affordable online MSW programs is a smart way to earn a master's in social work while managing costs. Another growing field is applied behavior analysis. Students can pursue bcba programs online to become Board Certified Behavior Analysts, supporting individuals with behavioral or developmental needs.

Online degrees in these areas offer affordable, flexible paths to meaningful, in-demand careers across community organizations, schools, and healthcare settings.

Best Scientists Citing Donald Hedeker

Trending Scientists