World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
59
Citations
21385
World Ranking
3634
National Ranking
2040

Stephanie T. Lanza publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephanie T. Lanza sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 202 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Stephanie T. Lanza D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephanie T. Lanza sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stephanie T. Lanza is affiliated with Pennsylvania State University in the United States. Their research spans across psychology and medicine, with significant contributions to clinical psychology, epidemiology, experimental and cognitive psychology, applied psychology, and pharmacology.

The scientist's scholarly work often focuses on topics including substance abuse treatment and outcomes, mental health research topics, behavioral health and interventions, cannabis and cannabinoid research, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, digital mental health interventions, and the impact of COVID-19 on mental health.

Recent publications by Stephanie T. Lanza include:

  • College Students' Sense of Belonging and Mental Health Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic, 2021, Journal of Adolescent Health
  • Simultaneous alcohol and marijuana use in daily life: Implications for level of use, subjective intoxication, and positive and negative consequences., 2020, Psychology of Addictive Behaviors
  • The microrandomized trial for developing digital interventions: Experimental design and data analysis considerations., 2022, Psychological Methods
  • Dynamic Associations of Parent-Adolescent Closeness and Friend Support With Adolescent Depressive Symptoms Across Ages 12-19, 2020, Journal of Research on Adolescence
  • Affect relative to day-level drinking initiation: Analyzing ecological momentary assessment data with multilevel spline modeling., 2020, Psychology of Addictive Behaviors

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Ashley N. Linden-Carmichael
  • Samuel W. Stull
  • Gregory M. Fosco
  • Anna K. Hochgraf
  • Martha J. Cox

Stephanie T. Lanza's work has been published repeatedly in several venues. The most frequent publication venues are:

  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • UNC Libraries
  • Addictive Behaviors
  • Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs
  • Journal of American College Health

Their research contributions reflect interdisciplinary approaches incorporating psychological methods and epidemiological perspectives, with particular emphasis on substance use behaviors, mental health outcomes, and adolescent development.

Best Publications

  • Latent Class and Latent Transition Analysis: With Applications in the Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences

    Linda M. Collins;Stephanie T. Lanza

  • Changes in Children’s Self-Competence and Values: Gender and Domain Differences across Grades One through Twelve

    Janis E. Jacobs;Stephanie Lanza;D. Wayne Osgood;Jacquelynne S. Eccles

  • PROC LCA: A SAS Procedure for Latent Class Analysis

    Stephanie T. Lanza;Linda M. Collins;David R. Lemmon;Joseph L. Schafer

  • Latent Class Analysis: An Alternative Perspective on Subgroup Analysis in Prevention and Treatment

    Stephanie T. Lanza;Brittany L. Rhoades

  • Sensitivity and specificity of information criteria.

    John J. Dziak;Donna L. Coffman;Stephanie T. Lanza;Runze Li

  • Latent Class Analysis With Distal Outcomes: A Flexible Model-Based Approach.

    Stephanie T. Lanza;Xianming Tan;Bethany C. Bray

  • Latent class and latent transition analysis.

    Stephanie T. Lanza;Brian P. Flaherty;Linda M. Collins

  • Latent Class Analysis for Developmental Research.

    Stephanie T. Lanza;Brittany R. Cooper

  • Effect Size, Statistical Power, and Sample Size Requirements for the Bootstrap Likelihood Ratio Test in Latent Class Analysis

    John J. Dziak;Stephanie T. Lanza;Xianming Tan

  • Demographic and familial predictors of early executive function development: contribution of a person-centered perspective.

    Brittany L. Rhoades;Mark T. Greenberg;Stephanie T. Lanza;Clancy Blair

  • A New SAS Procedure for Latent Transition Analysis: Transitions in Dating and Sexual Risk Behavior

    Stephanie T. Lanza;Linda M. Collins

  • Eliminating Bias in Classify-Analyze Approaches for Latent Class Analysis.

    Bethany C. Bray;Stephanie T. Lanza;Xianming Tan

  • Latent transition analysis: Benefits of a latent variable approach to modeling transitions in substance use

    Stephanie T. Lanza;Megan E. Patrick;Jennifer L. Maggs

  • Modeling the interplay of multilevel risk factors for future academic and behavior problems: A person-centered approach

    Stephanie T. Lanza;Brittany L. Rhoades;Robert L. Nix;Mark T. Greenberg

  • Pubertal timing and the onset of substance use in females during early adolescence.

    Stephanie T. Lanza;Linda M. Collins

  • Age trends in rates of substance use disorders across ages 18–90: Differences by gender and race/ethnicity

    Sara A. Vasilenko;Rebecca J. Evans-Polce;Stephanie T. Lanza

  • Medical decision-making capacity in patients with mild cognitive impairment

    O. Okonkwo;H. R. Griffith;K. Belue;S. Lanza

  • College Students’ Sense of Belonging and Mental Health Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic

    Unknown

  • An Introduction to Latent Class and Latent Transition Analysis

    Stephanie T. Lanza;Bethany C. Bray;Linda M. Collins

  • A Mixture Model of Discontinuous Development in Heavy Drinking From Ages 18 to 30: The Role of College Enrollment*

    Stephanie T. Lanza;Linda M. Collins

  • Changes in gender and racial/ethnic disparities in rates of cigarette use, regular heavy episodic drinking, and marijuana use: ages 14 to 32

    Rebecca J. Evans-Polce;Sara A. Vasilenko;Stephanie T. Lanza

  • Using the Time-Varying Effect Model (TVEM) to Examine Dynamic Associations between Negative Affect and Self Confidence on Smoking Urges: Differences between Successful Quitters and Relapsers

    Mariya P. Shiyko;Stephanie T. Lanza;Xianming Tan;Runze Li

Frequent Co-Authors

Linda M. Collins
Linda M. Collins New York University
Runze Li
Runze Li Pennsylvania State University
Megan E. Patrick
Megan E. Patrick University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Mark T. Greenberg
Mark T. Greenberg Pennsylvania State University
Jennifer L. Maggs
Jennifer L. Maggs Pennsylvania State University
Ann C. Crouter
Ann C. Crouter Pennsylvania State University
Joshua M. Smyth
Joshua M. Smyth Pennsylvania State University
David E. Conroy
David E. Conroy Pennsylvania State University
Clancy Blair
Clancy Blair New York University
Lynne Vernon-Feagans
Lynne Vernon-Feagans University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Psychology in the USA opens pathways to a wide array of related online degrees and careers, particularly in the field of social work. Pursuing an online degree in social work or counseling is a popular option for those interested in making a tangible impact on individuals and communities. These programs not only enhance your understanding of human behavior but also prepare you for rewarding roles in mental health, education, and community services.

Accredited online programs are available at renowned institutions nationwide. You can learn about the top social work programs in Columbus and discover flexible opportunities that fit your schedule in thriving cities. Similarly, the top social work degrees in Houston offer unique specializations for students interested in addressing urban community needs.

For those seeking location-specific insights, resources highlight the best social work programs in Idaho and the best social work programs in Jackson. These options pave the way for careers in counseling, case management, advocacy, and more, helping you build a meaningful future while serving others.

Best Scientists Citing Stephanie T. Lanza

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles