World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
67
Citations
21430
World Ranking
2563
National Ranking
1484

Daniel C. Marson publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel C. Marson sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 186 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Daniel C. Marson D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel C. Marson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel C. Marson is affiliated with the University of Alabama at Birmingham in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with significant contributions in Psychiatry and Mental Health, Physiology, Molecular Biology, Neurology, and Clinical Psychology.

Throughout their career, they have authored several papers covering a range of topics related to dementia, cognitive impairment, and neurodegenerative diseases. Their recent publications include:

  • In vivo staging of regional amyloid deposition, 2022, Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University)
  • Higher CSF sTREM2 attenuates ApoE4-related risk for cognitive decline and neurodegeneration, 2020, Molecular Neurodegeneration
  • Differentiating among stages of cognitive impairment in aging: Version 3 of the Uniform Data Set (UDS) neuropsychological test battery and MoCA index scores, 2020, Alzheimer's & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
  • Cognitive Processing Speed Is Strongly Related to Driving Skills, Financial Abilities, and Other Instrumental Activities of Daily Living in Persons With Mild Cognitive Impairment and Mild Dementia, 2020, The Journals of Gerontology Series A
  • Correlation between Alzheimer's disease and type 2 diabetes using non-negative matrix factorization, 2021, Scientific Reports

Their research spans several main topics, including:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Older Adults Driving Studies
  • Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Elder Abuse and Neglect
  • Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Daniel C. Marson include John C. Morris, Jeffrey Kaye, Joseph F. Quinn, Sara Dolen, and Sonia Pawluczyk.

The scientist has contributed publications to various academic venues, among which the most recurrent are:

  • Scientific Reports
  • Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
  • Communications Medicine
  • Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
  • Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University)

Best Publications

  • Common variants at MS4A4/MS4A6E, CD2AP, CD33 and EPHA1 are associated with late-onset Alzheimer's disease.

    Adam C. Naj;Gyungah Jun;Gary W. Beecham;Li-San Wang

  • Practice guideline update summary: Mild cognitive impairment: Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology

    Ronald C. Petersen;Oscar Lopez;Melissa J. Armstrong;Thomas S.D. Getchius

  • Early role of vascular dysregulation on late-onset Alzheimer’s disease based on multifactorial data-driven analysis

    Y. Iturria-Medina;R. C. Sotero;P. J. Toussaint;J. M. Mateos-Pérez

  • Rare coding variants in PLCG2, ABI3, and TREM2 implicate microglial-mediated innate immunity in Alzheimer's disease

    Rebecca Sims;Sven J. Van Der Lee;Adam C. Naj;Céline Bellenguez;Céline Bellenguez

  • The National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) database: the Uniform Data Set.

    Duane L. Beekly;Erin M. Ramos;William W. Lee;Woodrow D. Deitrich

  • Common variants at 7p21 are associated with frontotemporal lobar degeneration with TDP-43 inclusions

    Vivianna M. Van Deerlin;Patrick M A Sleiman;Maria Martinez-Lage;Maria Martinez-Lage;Alice Chen-Plotkin

  • Version 3 of the Alzheimer Disease Centers' Neuropsychological Test Battery in the Uniform Data Set (UDS)

    Sandra Weintraub;Lilah Besser;Hiroko H. Dodge;Merilee Teylan

  • Assessing the Competency of Patients With Alzheimer's Disease Under Different Legal Standards: A Prototype Instrument

    Daniel C. Marson;Kellie K. Ingram;Heather A. Cody;Lindy E. Harrell

  • Assessment of Decision-Making Capacity in Older Adults: An Emerging Area of Practice and Research

    Jennifer Moye;Daniel C. Marson

  • Exceptionally low likelihood of Alzheimer’s dementia in APOE2 homozygotes from a 5,000-person neuropathological study

    Eric M Reiman;Joseph F Arboleda-Velasquez;Yakeel T Quiroz;Matthew J Huentelman

  • Assessing financial capacity in patients with Alzheimer disease: A conceptual model and prototype instrument.

    Daniel C. Marson;Stephen M. Sawrie;Scott Snyder;Bronwyn McInturff

  • Impaired financial abilities in mild cognitive impairment: a direct assessment approach.

    H. R. Griffith;K. Belue;A. Sicola;S. Krzywanski

  • Common genetic variants in the CLDN2 and PRSS1-PRSS2 loci alter risk for alcohol-related and sporadic pancreatitis

    David C. Whitcomb;Jessica LaRusch;Alyssa M. Krasinskas;Lambertus Klei

  • Basal forebrain degeneration precedes and predicts the cortical spread of Alzheimer's pathology.

    Taylor W. Schmitz;R. Nathan Spreng;Michael W. Weiner;Paul Aisen

  • A novel Alzheimer disease locus located near the gene encoding tau protein

    G. Jun;C. A. Ibrahim-Verbaas;M. Vronskaya;J-C Lambert;J-C Lambert;J-C Lambert

  • Consistency of physician judgments of capacity to consent in mild Alzheimer's disease.

    Daniel C. Marson;Bronwyn McInturff;Lauren Hawkins;Alfred Bartolucci

  • Toward a neurologic model of competency: Cognitive predictors of capacity to consent in Alzheimer's disease using three different legal standards.

    D C Marson;A Chatterjee;K K Ingram;L E Harrell

  • Novel Alzheimer Disease Risk Loci and Pathways in African American Individuals Using the African Genome Resources Panel: A Meta-analysis

    Brian W. Kunkle;Michael Schmidt;Hans Ulrich Klein;Adam C. Naj

  • Subregional neuroanatomical change as a biomarker for Alzheimer's disease

    Dominic Holland;James B. Brewer;Donald J. Hagler;Christine Fennema-Notestine

  • Declining financial capacity in mild cognitive impairment: A 1-year longitudinal study

    K. L. Triebel;R. Martin;H. R. Griffith;J. Marceaux

  • ADCS Prevention Instrument Project: assessment of instrumental activities of daily living for community-dwelling elderly individuals in dementia prevention clinical trials.

    Douglas Galasko;David A. Bennett;Mary Sano;Mary Sano;Daniel Marson

Frequent Co-Authors

Roy C. Martin
Roy C. Martin University of Alabama at Birmingham
John C. Morris
John C. Morris Washington University in St. Louis
Ronald C. Petersen
Ronald C. Petersen University of Pennsylvania
Jeffrey Kaye
Jeffrey Kaye Oregon Health & Science University
Ozioma C. Okonkwo
Ozioma C. Okonkwo University of Wisconsin–Madison
Charles DeCarli
Charles DeCarli University of California, Davis
Allan I. Levey
Allan I. Levey Emory University
James J. Lah
James J. Lah Emory University
Joseph F. Quinn
Joseph F. Quinn Oregon Health & Science University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens up a wide range of online degrees and specialized pathways. Behavioral analysis is a popular field, especially for those interested in working with individuals with autism and other developmental conditions. One rewarding and in-demand role is that of a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA).

The requirements for becoming a BCBA can vary by state. If you want to learn more about how to become a bcba in Washington, you'll discover the specific educational and supervised experience needed to become certified. Similarly, requirements exist for other locations. For instance, you can read about how to become a bcba in West Virginia to understand that state's unique steps and credentials.

Many psychology programs now offer online options, making it easier to meet educational prerequisites no matter where you live. If you're considering Wisconsin, visit the guide on Wisconsin bcba requirements. For those in the Mountain West, you can explore bcba certification requirements in Wyoming to get a full overview of the process.

By understanding these pathways, you can choose the best online psychology degree to help you reach your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel C. Marson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles