World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ulrich Trautwein

Ulrich Trautwein

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
96
Citations
37307
World Ranking
732
National Ranking
22

Ulrich Trautwein publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulrich Trautwein sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 345 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Ulrich Trautwein D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulrich Trautwein sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 96 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ulrich Trautwein is affiliated with the University of Tübingen in Germany and has produced extensive research primarily in the fields of Psychology and Social Sciences. Their work has a broad focus encompassing Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Education, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, and Developmental and Educational Psychology.

Their research covers key topics including Education, Achievement, and Giftedness; Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports; Personality Traits and Psychology; Cognitive Abilities and Testing; Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts; Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation; and Early Childhood Education and Development.

Notable recent papers include:

  • Learning with simulated virtual classmates: Effects of social-related configurations on students' visual attention and learning experiences in an immersive virtual reality classroom, 2022, published in Computers in Human Behavior
  • The "situative nature" of competence and value beliefs and the predictive power of autonomy support: A multilevel investigation of repeated observations, 2021, published in Journal of Educational Psychology
  • It Takes Two: Expectancy-Value Constructs and Vocational Interests Jointly Predict STEM Major Choices, 2020, published in Contemporary Educational Psychology
  • The transmission of values from math teachers to their ninth-grade students: Different mechanisms for different value dimensions?, 2020, published in Contemporary Educational Psychology
  • RIASEC interests and the Big Five personality traits matter for life success-But do they already matter for educational track choices?, 2020, published in Journal of Personality

Frequent co-authors in Ulrich Trautwein's research include Benjamin Nagengast, Enkelejda Kasneci, Peter Gerjets, Richard Göllner, and Hanna Gaspard.

They have contributed numerous publications to several academic journals, with the most frequent venues being the Journal of Educational Psychology, Learning and Instruction, Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, Contemporary Educational Psychology, and European Journal of Personality.

Ulrich Trautwein is also an author of book publications, including a 2024 work titled Literar- und medienästhetisches Lernen: Zum Praxisbezug fachdidaktischer Forschungspraktiken, published under Sprachlich-literarisches Lernen und Deutschdidaktik. Bände.

Best Publications

  • Academic Self‐Concept, Interest, Grades, and Standardized Test Scores: Reciprocal Effects Models of Causal Ordering

    Herbert W. Marsh;Ulrich Trautwein;Oliver Lüdtke;Olaf Köller

  • Classical Latent Profile Analysis of Academic Self-Concept Dimensions: Synergy of Person- and Variable-Centered Approaches to Theoretical Models of Self-Concept

    Herbert Warren Marsh;Oliver Ludtke;Ulrich Trautwein;Alexandre Morin

  • Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling, Integrating CFA and EFA: Application to Students' Evaluations of University Teaching

    Herbert Warren Marsh;Bengt Muthen;Tihomir Asparouhov;Oliver Ludtke

  • A new look at the big five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling.

    Herbert W. Marsh;Oliver Lüdtke;Bengt Muthén;Tihomir Asparouhov

  • The Multilevel Latent Covariate Model: A New, More Reliable Approach to Group-Level Effects in Contextual Studies.

    Oliver Ludtke;Herbert Warren Marsh;Alexander Robitzsch;Ulrich Trautwein

  • Motivations for choosing teaching as a career : An international comparison using the FIT-Choice scale

    Helen Margaret Gilchrist Watt;Paul William Richardson;Uta Klusmann;Mareike Kunter

  • Teachers' occupational well-being and quality of instruction: The important role of self-regulatory patterns

    Uta Klusmann;Mareike Kunter;Ulrich Trautwein;Oliver Lüdtke

  • Classroom climate and contextual effects : conceptual and methodological issues in the evaluation of group-level effects

    Herbert W. Marsh;Oliver Lüdtke;Benjamin Nagengast;Ulrich Trautwein

  • Predicting Homework Effort: Support for a Domain-Specific, Multilevel Homework Model.

    Ulrich Trautwein;Oliver Lüdtke;Inge Schnyder;Alois Niggli

  • The Big-fish–little-pond-effect Stands Up to Critical Scrutiny: Implications for Theory, Methodology, and Future Research

    Herbert Warren Marsh;Marjorie Seaton;Ulrich Trautwein;Oliver Ludtke

  • A Random Walk Down University Avenue: Life Paths, Life Events, and Personality Trait Change at the Transition to University Life

    Oliver Lüdtke;Brent W. Roberts;Ulrich Trautwein;Gabriel Nagy

  • Probing for the multiplicative term in modern expectancy-value theory: a latent interaction modeling study

    Ulrich Trautwein;Herbert W Marsh;Benjamin Nagengast;Oliver Lüdtke

  • Assessing the impact of learning environments: How to use student ratings of classroom or school characteristics in multilevel modeling

    Oliver Lüdtke;Alexander Robitzsch;Ulrich Trautwein;Mareike Kunter

  • What makes lessons interesting?: The role of situational and individual factors in three school subjects

    Yi-Miau Tsai;Mareike Kunter;Oliver Ludtke;Ulrich Trautwein

  • Self-esteem, academic self-concept, and achievement: how the learning environment moderates the dynamics of self-concept.

    Ulrich Trautwein;Oliver Lüdtke;Olaf Köller;Jürgen Baumert

  • Tracking, grading, and student motivation : Using group composition and status to predict self-concept and interest in ninth-grade mathematics

    Ulrich Trautwein;Oliver Lüdtke;Herbert W. Marsh;Olaf Köller

  • Doubly-Latent Models of School Contextual Effects: Integrating Multilevel and Structural Equation Approaches to Control Measurement and Sampling Error.

    Herbert Warren Marsh;Oliver Ludtke;Alexander Robitzsch;Ulrich Trautwein

  • The homework–achievement relation reconsidered: Differentiating homework time, homework frequency, and homework effort

    Ulrich Trautwein

  • Schulumwelten - institutionelle Bedingungen des Lehrens und Lernens

    Jürgen Baumert;Ulrich Trautwein;Cordula Artelt

  • Gender and course selection in upper secondary education: Effects of academic self-concept and intrinsic value

    Gabriel Nagy;Ulrich Trautwein;Jürgen Baumert;Olaf Köller

Frequent Co-Authors

Oliver Lüdtke
Oliver Lüdtke Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education
Olaf Köller
Olaf Köller Leibniz Association
Benjamin Nagengast
Benjamin Nagengast University of Tübingen
Herbert W. Marsh
Herbert W. Marsh Australian Catholic University
Brent W. Roberts
Brent W. Roberts University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Mareike Kunter
Mareike Kunter Goethe University Frankfurt
Ingo Zettler
Ingo Zettler University of Copenhagen
Philip D. Parker
Philip D. Parker Australian Catholic University
Enkelejda Kasneci
Enkelejda Kasneci Technical University of Munich
John F. Rauthmann
John F. Rauthmann Bielefeld University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens the door to many rewarding careers, especially in fields focused on mental health and substance abuse counseling. Online psychology degrees are a flexible way to start your journey, providing a foundation to meet local and national certification requirements.

If you are interested in working with individuals battling addiction, it’s important to understand the specific qualifications needed in your area. To learn more about Toledo substance abuse counselor certification requirements, visit the linked resource. Requirements may differ greatly by region; for example, see the substance abuse counselor requirements in Tucson or how to how to become a substance abuse counselor in Tulsa for detailed local guidance.

Those considering licensure or further study should also explore the substance abuse counselor requirements in Virginia Beach. Each location has its own standards for education, supervised hours, and exams. By researching these requirements and enrolling in an accredited psychology program, you’ll be well-equipped to step into this essential and impactful career.

Best Scientists Citing Ulrich Trautwein

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles