World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
50
Citations
9070
World Ranking
5465
National Ranking
17

Ingo Zettler publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ingo Zettler sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 184 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Ingo Zettler D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ingo Zettler sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ingo Zettler is affiliated with the University of Copenhagen in Denmark and has contributed extensively to the fields of psychology and social sciences. Their research spans multiple subfields, including clinical psychology, sociology and political science, experimental and cognitive psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and social psychology.

The primary areas of focus in Zettler's body of work involve personality traits and psychology, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, personality disorders and psychopathology, social and intergroup psychology, experimental behavioral economics studies, vaccine coverage and hesitancy, and behavioral health and interventions.

Zettler has published frequently in several key academic journals. The venues with the highest numbers of their publications include:

  • Journal of Research in Personality
  • European Journal of Personality
  • Social Psychological and Personality Science
  • Journal of Personality
  • Journal of Personality Assessment

Some recent papers authored by Zettler illustrate the range and focus of their research contributions:

  • The Nomological Net of the HEXACO Model of Personality: A Large-Scale Meta-Analytic Investigation, 2020, Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • The Role of Personality in COVID-19-Related Perceptions, Evaluations, and Behaviors: Findings Across Five Samples, Nine Traits, and 17 Criteria, 2021, Social Psychological and Personality Science

Zettler's collaborations include frequent co-authors such as Lau Lilleholt, Morten Moshagen, Benjamin E. Hilbig, Robert Böhm, and Christoph Schild.

Best Publications

  • The dark core of personality.

    Morten Moshagen;Benjamin E. Hilbig;Ingo Zettler

  • Pillars of cooperation: Honesty-Humility, social value orientations, and economic behavior

    Benjamin E. Hilbig;Ingo Zettler

  • Conspiracy Theories and Their Societal Effects During the COVID-19 Pandemic

    Lotte Pummerer;Robert Böhm;Lau Lilleholt;Kevin Winter

  • Personality, political skill, and job performance

    Gerhard Blickle;James A. Meurs;Ingo Zettler;Jutta Solga

  • Personality and prosocial behavior: linking basic traits and social value orientations.

    Benjamin E. Hilbig;Andreas Glöckner;Ingo Zettler

  • Political skill construct and criterion‐related validation: a two‐study investigation

    Gerald R. Ferris;Gerhard Blickle;Paula B. Schneider;Jochen Kramer

  • It takes two : Honesty-humility and agreeableness differentially predict active versus reactive cooperation

    Benjamin E. Hilbig;Benjamin E. Hilbig;Benjamin E. Hilbig;Ingo Zettler;Ingo Zettler;Ingo Zettler;Felix Leist;Felix Leist;Felix Leist;Timo Heydasch;Timo Heydasch;Timo Heydasch

  • The Nomological Net of the HEXACO Model of Personality: A Large-Scale Meta-Analytic Investigation.

    Ingo Zettler;Isabel Thielmann;Benjamin E Hilbig;Morten Moshagen

  • To which world regions does the valence–dominance model of social perception apply?

    Benedict C. Jones;Lisa M. DeBruine;Jessica K. Flake;Marco Tullio Liuzza

  • Honesty-Humility and a person-situation-interaction at work

    Ingo Zettler;Benjamin E. Hilbig

  • Faktorenstruktur, psychometrische Eigenschaften und Messinvarianz der deutschsprachigen Version des 60- Item HEXACO Persönlichkeitsinventars

    Morten Moshagen;Benjamin E. Hilbig;Ingo Zettler

  • When the cat’s away, some mice will play: A basic trait account of dishonest behavior

    Benjamin E. Hilbig;Ingo Zettler

  • Personality, punishment, and public-goods: Strategic shifts towards cooperation as a matter of dispositional Honesty-Humility

    Benjamin E. Hilbig;Ingo Zettler;Timo Heydasch

  • Measuring the 7Cs of Vaccination Readiness

    Mattis Geiger;Franziska Rees;Lau Lilleholt;Ana P. Santana

  • Rethinking Trait Conceptions of Social Desirability Scales Impression Management as an Expression of Honesty-Humility

    Reinout E. de Vries;Ingo Zettler;Benjamin E. Hilbig

  • Dissecting work commitment: the role of Machiavellianism

    Ingo Zettler;Niklas Friedrich;Benjamin E. Hilbig

  • Not Enough of a ‘Dark’ Trait? Linking Machiavellianism to Job Performance

    Ingo Zettler;Marc Solga

  • Measuring the Dark Core of Personality

    Morten Moshagen;Ingo Zettler;Benjamin E. Hilbig

  • The Stability of Extreme Response Style and Acquiescence Over 8 Years

    Eunike Wetzel;Eunike Wetzel;Oliver Lüdtke;Ingo Zettler;Jan R. Böhnke

  • The Role of Personality in COVID-19-Related Perceptions, Evaluations, and Behaviors: Findings Across Five Samples, Nine Traits, and 17 Criteria

    Ingo Zettler;Christoph Schild;Christoph Schild;Lau Lilleholt;Lara Kroencke

  • Two sides of one coin: Honesty–Humility and situational factors mutually shape social dilemma decision making

    Ingo Zettler;Benjamin E. Hilbig;Timo Heydasch

  • Implicit motives, explicit traits, and task and contextual performance at work

    Jonas W. B. Lang;Ingo Zettler;Christian Ewen;Ute R. Hülsheger

Frequent Co-Authors

Benjamin E. Hilbig
Benjamin E. Hilbig University of Koblenz and Landau
Morten Moshagen
Morten Moshagen University of Ulm
Ulrich Trautwein
Ulrich Trautwein University of Tübingen
Reinout E. de Vries
Reinout E. de Vries Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Gerald R. Ferris
Gerald R. Ferris Florida State University
Oliver Wilhelm
Oliver Wilhelm University of Ulm
Marc Marschark
Marc Marschark Rochester Institute of Technology
Michael C. Ashton
Michael C. Ashton Brock University
Peter Gerjets
Peter Gerjets University of Tübingen
Kibeom Lee
Kibeom Lee University of Calgary

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a psychology degree in the USA opens diverse career pathways, especially in fields like Marriage and Family Therapy (MFT). Many universities now offer online degrees in psychology, counseling, and related disciplines, making it easier to balance your studies with other commitments.

To become a practicing therapist, you’ll need to meet specific certification and education requirements based on your location. For example, learn more about Corpus Christi mft certification requirements or explore the unique steps involved under Dallas mft certification requirements.

Requirements can differ substantially between states and cities. Check the mft requirements in Denver for specifics on Colorado, or see what’s needed under Detroit mft education requirements.

Understanding regional licensing regulations is key for anyone pursuing an online psychology degree and aiming for a career in therapy. Make sure your chosen program aligns with the requirements in your desired area of practice.

Best Scientists Citing Ingo Zettler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles