World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
31
Citations
3988
World Ranking
11189
National Ranking
539

Isabel Thielmann publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Isabel Thielmann sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 92 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Isabel Thielmann D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Isabel Thielmann sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis.

    Isabel Thielmann;Giuliana Spadaro;Daniel Balliet

  • Prosocial behavior and altruism: A review of concepts and definitions.

    Stefan Pfattheicher;Yngwie Asbjørn Nielsen;Isabel Thielmann

  • Trust: An integrative review from a person–situation perspective.

    Isabel Thielmann;Benjamin E. Hilbig

  • The Nomological Net of the HEXACO Model of Personality: A Large-Scale Meta-Analytic Investigation.

    Ingo Zettler;Isabel Thielmann;Benjamin E Hilbig;Morten Moshagen

  • Who Lies? A Large-Scale Reanalysis Linking Basic Personality Traits to Unethical Decision Making

    Daniel W. Heck;Isabel Thielmann;Morten Moshagen;Benjamin E. Hilbig

  • Trust in me, trust in you: A social projection account of the link between personality, cooperativeness, and trustworthiness expectations

    Isabel Thielmann;Benjamin E. Hilbig

  • The Traits One Can Trust Dissecting Reciprocity and Kindness as Determinants of Trustworthy Behavior

    Isabel Thielmann;Isabel Thielmann;Benjamin E. Hilbig

  • From personality to altruistic behavior (and back): Evidence from a double-blind dictator game.

    Benjamin E. Hilbig;Isabel Thielmann;Johanna Hepp;Sina A. Klein

  • Economic games: An introduction and guide for research

    Isabel Thielmann;Robert Böhm;Marion Ott;Benjamin E. Hilbig

  • On the Comparability of Basic Personality Models: Meta-Analytic Correspondence, Scope, and Orthogonality of the Big Five and HEXACO Dimensions:

    Isabel Thielmann;Morten Moshagen;BenjaminE. Hilbig;Ingo Zettler

  • Meta-analytic investigations of the HEXACO Personality Inventory(-Revised): Reliability generalization, self-observer agreement, intercorrelations, and relations to demographic variables

    Morten Moshagen;Isabel Thielmann;Benjamin E. Hilbig;Ingo Zettler

  • The HEXACO–100 Across 16 Languages: A Large-Scale Test of Measurement Invariance

    Isabel Thielmann;Nazar Akrami;Toni Babarović;Amparo Belloch

  • Are social desirability scales desirable? A meta-analytic test of the validity of social desirability scales in the context of prosocial behavior.

    Lukas Lanz;Isabel Thielmann;Fabiola H. Gerpott;Fabiola H. Gerpott

  • Gossip and reputation in everyday life

    Terence Daniel das Dores Cruz;Isabel Thielmann;Simon Columbus;Simon Columbus;Catherine Molho;Catherine Molho;Catherine Molho

  • Who wants to change and how? On the trait-specificity of personality change goals.

    Isabel Thielmann;Reinout E. de Vries

  • Willing to give but not to forgive: borderline personality features and cooperative behavior.

    Isabel Thielmann;Benjamin E. Hilbig;Inga Niedtfeld

  • Anonymity and incentives : an investigation of techniques to reduce socially desirable responding in the Trust Game

    Isabel Thielmann;Daniel W. Heck;Benjamin E. Hilbig

  • Seeing me, seeing you: Testing competing accounts of assumed similarity in personality judgments.

    Isabel Thielmann;Benjamin E. Hilbig;Ingo Zettler

  • Does everyone have a price? On the role of payoff magnitude for ethical decision making

    Benjamin E. Hilbig;Isabel Thielmann

  • Who Does (Not) Participate in Intergroup Conflict

    Isabel Thielmann;Robert Böhm

Frequent Co-Authors

Benjamin E. Hilbig
Benjamin E. Hilbig University of Koblenz and Landau
Ingo Zettler
Ingo Zettler University of Copenhagen
Morten Moshagen
Morten Moshagen University of Ulm
Daniel Balliet
Daniel Balliet Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Reinout E. de Vries
Reinout E. de Vries Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Johannes Zimmermann
Johannes Zimmermann University of Kassel
Michael C. Ashton
Michael C. Ashton Brock University
Kibeom Lee
Kibeom Lee University of Calgary
Antonio Chirumbolo
Antonio Chirumbolo Sapienza University of Rome
Marco Perugini
Marco Perugini University of Milano-Bicocca

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Isabel Thielmann

Recently Published Articles