World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Morten Moshagen

Morten Moshagen

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
42
Citations
7470
World Ranking
7547
National Ranking
361

Morten Moshagen publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Morten Moshagen sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 117 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Morten Moshagen D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Morten Moshagen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Morten Moshagen is affiliated with the University of Ulm in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on psychology, with a significant emphasis on clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, applied psychology, social psychology, and sociology and political science.

They have contributed extensively to the field with 103 publications in psychology. Their work spans several main topics, including personality traits and psychology, personality disorders and psychopathology, social and intergroup psychology, psychometric methodologies and testing, mental health research topics, digital mental health interventions, and advanced statistical modeling techniques.

The scientist has authored several recent papers, notably:

  • "The Nomological Net of the HEXACO Model of Personality: A Large-Scale Meta-Analytic Investigation," 2020, published in Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • "A tutorial on assessing statistical power and determining sample size for structural equation models," 2021, published in Psychological Methods
  • "semPower: General power analysis for structural equation models," 2023, published in Behavior Research Methods
  • "The Role of Personality in COVID-19-Related Perceptions, Evaluations, and Behaviors: Findings Across Five Samples, Nine Traits, and 17 Criteria," 2021, published in Social Psychological and Personality Science
  • "On the Comparability of Basic Personality Models: Meta-Analytic Correspondence, Scope, and Orthogonality of the Big Five and HEXACO Dimensions," 2021, published in European Journal of Personality

Morten Moshagen's frequent collaborators include:

  • Ingo Zettler
  • Benjamin E. Hilbig
  • Martina Bader
  • Isabel Thielmann
  • Luisa K. Horsten

Their work is regularly published in leading psychology journals. The most common publication venues for their research include:

  • Journal of Personality
  • Journal of Research in Personality
  • European Journal of Personality
  • Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal
  • BMJ Open

Best Publications

  • Facets of visual aesthetics

    Morten Moshagen;Meinald T. Thielsch

  • The dark core of personality.

    Morten Moshagen;Benjamin E. Hilbig;Ingo Zettler

  • multiTree: A computer program for the analysis of multinomial processing tree models.

    Morten Moshagen

  • Multinomial processing tree models: A review of the literature.

    Edgar Erdfelder;Tina-Sarah Auer;Benjamin E. Hilbig;André Aßfalg

  • How to determine the number of factors to retain in exploratory factor analysis: A comparison of extraction methods under realistic conditions.

    Max Auerswald;Morten Moshagen

  • A New Strategy for Testing Structural Equation Models

    Morten Moshagen;Edgar Erdfelder

  • The Nomological Net of the HEXACO Model of Personality: A Large-Scale Meta-Analytic Investigation.

    Ingo Zettler;Isabel Thielmann;Benjamin E Hilbig;Morten Moshagen

  • A blessing, not a curse: Experimental evidence for beneficial effects of visual aesthetics on performance.

    Morten Moshagen;Jochen Musch;Anja S. Göritz

  • semPower: General power analysis for structural equation models

    Unknown

  • Faktorenstruktur, psychometrische Eigenschaften und Messinvarianz der deutschsprachigen Version des 60- Item HEXACO Persönlichkeitsinventars

    Morten Moshagen;Benjamin E. Hilbig;Ingo Zettler

  • A tutorial on assessing statistical power and determining sample size for structural equation models.

    Lisa J. Jobst;Martina Bader;Morten Moshagen

  • A short version of the visual aesthetics of websites inventory

    Morten Moshagen;Meinald Thielsch

  • Sample Size Requirements of the Robust Weighted Least Squares Estimator

    Morten Moshagen;Morten Moshagen;Jochen Musch

  • Measuring the Dark Core of Personality

    Morten Moshagen;Ingo Zettler;Benjamin E. Hilbig

  • Who Lies? A Large-Scale Reanalysis Linking Basic Personality Traits to Unethical Decision Making

    Daniel W. Heck;Isabel Thielmann;Morten Moshagen;Benjamin E. Hilbig

  • The Role of Personality in COVID-19-Related Perceptions, Evaluations, and Behaviors: Findings Across Five Samples, Nine Traits, and 17 Criteria

    Ingo Zettler;Christoph Schild;Christoph Schild;Lau Lilleholt;Lara Kroencke

  • A randomized-response investigation of the education effect in attitudes towards foreigners

    Martin Ostapczuk;Jochen Musch;Morten Moshagen

  • Tracing the path from personality – via cooperativeness – to conservation

    Benjamin E. Hilbig;Ingo Zettler;Morten Moshagen;Timo Heydasch

  • Dishonest responding or true virtue? A behavioral test of impression management

    Ingo Zettler;Benjamin E. Hilbig;Morten Moshagen;Reinout E. de Vries

  • Reducing socially desirable responses in epidemiologic surveys: an extension of the randomized-response technique.

    Morten Moshagen;Jochen Musch;Martin Ostapczuk;Zengmei Zhao

  • On the Comparability of Basic Personality Models: Meta-Analytic Correspondence, Scope, and Orthogonality of the Big Five and HEXACO Dimensions:

    Isabel Thielmann;Morten Moshagen;BenjaminE. Hilbig;Ingo Zettler

  • Meta-analytic investigations of the HEXACO Personality Inventory(-Revised): Reliability generalization, self-observer agreement, intercorrelations, and relations to demographic variables

    Morten Moshagen;Isabel Thielmann;Benjamin E. Hilbig;Ingo Zettler

  • Patterns of alcohol expectancies and alcohol use across age and gender

    Jennifer Nicolai;Morten Moshagen;Ralf Demmel

  • The comprehensive alcohol expectancy questionnaire: confirmatory factor analysis, scale refinement, and further validation.

    Jennifer Nicolai;Ralf Demmel;Morten Moshagen

Frequent Co-Authors

Benjamin E. Hilbig
Benjamin E. Hilbig University of Koblenz and Landau
Ingo Zettler
Ingo Zettler University of Copenhagen
Jochen Musch
Jochen Musch Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Edgar Erdfelder
Edgar Erdfelder University of Mannheim
Isabel Thielmann
Isabel Thielmann Max Planck Institute for Foreign and International Criminal Law
Oliver Wilhelm
Oliver Wilhelm University of Ulm
David Daniel Ebert
David Daniel Ebert Technical University of Munich
Harald Baumeister
Harald Baumeister University of Ulm
Cornelia Sindermann
Cornelia Sindermann University of Ulm
Christian Montag
Christian Montag University of Macau

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees can open doors to a variety of rewarding careers, including counseling, human resources, social services, and research roles. Popular degree programs across the United States—both on campus and online—reflect the growing demand for psychological expertise in today’s workforce.

For example, the most popular psychology degree programs in Fort Worth and popular psychology programs in Kent showcase diverse course offerings, from clinical psychology to industrial-organizational concentrations. Cities like Las Vegas are also home to top-ranked psychology degree programs in Las Vegas with flexible learning formats designed to fit adult learners and working professionals.

Nashville’s academic community stands out for its top-ranked psychology degree programs in Nashville, which often incorporate real-world practicum experiences, ideal for those interested in direct service roles. Whether pursued online or on campus, psychology degrees provide foundational skills for graduate study or immediate entry into fields that value empathy, research, and effective communication.

Best Scientists Citing Morten Moshagen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles