World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
32
Citations
4461
World Ranking
10901
National Ranking
529

Ute J. Bayen publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ute J. Bayen sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 84 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Ute J. Bayen D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ute J. Bayen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ute J. Bayen is affiliated with Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Psychology and Neuroscience, with a strong emphasis on Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Their work further intersects with Developmental and Educational Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, and Psychiatry and Mental Health.

The scientist's research topics include:

  • Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Memory Processes and Influences
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Deception Detection and Forensic Psychology
  • Educational Strategies and Epistemologies

Ute J. Bayen has contributed to numerous publications, some recent ones being:

  • "When your brain looks older than expected: combined lifestyle risk and BrainAGE" (2021) published in Brain Structure and Function
  • "Are subjective sleepiness and sleep quality related to prospective memory?" (2020) published in Cognitive Research Principles and Implications
  • "Older and younger adults' hindsight bias after positive and negative outcomes" (2021) published in Memory & Cognition
  • "The metamemory expectancy illusion in source monitoring affects metamemory control and memory" (2020) published in Cognition
  • "Adaptive prospective memory for faces of cheaters and cooperators." (2021) published in Journal of Experimental Psychology General

Frequently publishing in venues such as Memory & Cognition, Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, Cognition, Brain Structure and Function, and Cognitive Research Principles and Implications, Bayen maintains a consistent presence in journals that focus on memory and cognitive processes.

The scientist collaborates often with several co-authors, including:

  • Marie Luisa Schaper
  • Sebastian Horn
  • Carolin V Hey
  • Mateja F. Böhm
  • Martha Michalkiewicz

Best Publications

  • A multinomial model of event-based prospective memory

    Rebekah E. Smith;Ute J. Bayen

  • Source discrimination, item detection, and multinomial models of source monitoring.

    Ute J. Bayen;Kevin Murnane;Edgar Erdfelder

  • Source monitoring deficits in patients with schizophrenia; a multinomial modelling analysis

    Richard S. E. Keefe;M. C. Arnold;U. J. Bayen;P. D. Harvey

  • Source-monitoring deficits for self-generated stimuli in schizophrenia: multinomial modeling of data from three sources.

    Richard S.E Keefe;Miriam C Arnold;Ute J Bayen;Joseph P McEvoy

  • Teaching Older Adults to Use Computers: Recommendations Based on Cognitive Aging Research.

    Brett D. Jones;Ute J. Bayen

  • An evaluation of empirical measures of source identification.

    Kevin Murnane;Ute J. Bayen

  • The use of schematic knowledge about sources in source monitoring

    Ute J. Bayen;Glenn V. Nakamura;Susan E. Dupuis;Chin-Lung Yang

  • The source of adult age differences in event-based prospective memory: a multinomial modeling approach.

    Rebekah E. Smith;Ute J. Bayen

  • The effects of working memory resource availability on prospective memory: a formal modeling approach.

    Rebekah E. Smith;Ute J. Bayen

  • The cognitive processes underlying event-based prospective memory in school-age children and young adults: a formal model-based study.

    Rebekah E. Smith;Ute Johanna Bayen;Claudia Martin

  • When is schematic knowledge used in source monitoring

    Julia Spaniol;Ute J. Bayen

  • Empirical validation of the diffusion model for recognition memory and a comparison of parameter-estimation methods

    Nina R. Arnold;Nina R. Arnold;Arndt Bröder;Ute J. Bayen

  • Influences of Source - Item Contingency and Schematic Knowledge on Source Monitoring: Tests of the Probability-Matching Account.

    Ute J. Bayen;Beatrice G. Kuhlmann

  • Aging and the use of perceptual and temporal information in source memory tasks

    Ute J. Bayen;Kevin Murnane

  • Are Compulsive Checkers Impaired in Memory? A Meta‐Analytic Review

    Carol M. Woods;Jack L. Vevea;Dianne L. Chambless;Ute J. Bayen

  • Effects of sleep deprivation on prospective memory

    Tobias Grundgeiger;Ute J. Bayen;Sebastian S. Horn

  • Age-Related Differences in the Use of Contextual Information in Recognition Memory A Global Matching Approach

    Ute J. Bayen;Matthew P. Phelps;Julia Spaniol

  • Age effects in emotional prospective memory: cue valence differentially affects the prospective and retrospective component.

    Katharina M. Schnitzspahn;Sebastian S. Horn;Ute J. Bayen;Matthias Kliegel

  • Primary versus secondary insomnia in older adults: Subjective sleep and daytime functioning.

    Kenneth L. Lichstein;H. Heith Durrence;Brant W. Riedel;Ute J. Bayen

  • The interplay of memory and judgment processes in effects of aging on hindsight bias.

    Ute J. Bayen;Edgar Erdfelder;J. Neil Bearden;Jeffrey P. Lozito

  • Adult age differences in distinctive processing: the modality effect on false recall.

    Rebekah E. Smith;Jeffrey P. Lozito;Ute J. Bayen

Frequent Co-Authors

Svenja Caspers
Svenja Caspers Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Katrin Amunts
Katrin Amunts Forschungszentrum Jülich
Sven Cichon
Sven Cichon University of Basel
Edgar Erdfelder
Edgar Erdfelder University of Mannheim
Thomas W. Mühleisen
Thomas W. Mühleisen University of Basel
Susanne Moebus
Susanne Moebus University of Duisburg-Essen
Felix Hoffstaedter
Felix Hoffstaedter Forschungszentrum Jülich
Simon B. Eickhoff
Simon B. Eickhoff Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Christian Gaser
Christian Gaser Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Edward C. Norton
Edward C. Norton University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a psychology degree opens up a variety of career possibilities in mental health, education, research, and beyond. With the rise of flexible learning options, many students are now exploring online psychology programs that fit their schedules and career goals.

When choosing a program, it's important to compare factors like accreditation, faculty expertise, internships, and career support. For example, you can explore the best psychology degree programs ranking in Charlotte or review the top psychology programs in Cleveland to see how established institutions support online students.

Colorado is also home to highly regarded programs. Check out the best psychology program rankings in Colorado, and learn about the top psychology programs in Colorado Springs for insights on remote learning, hybrid options, and local career prospects.

Whether you pursue clinical practice, counseling, research, or organizational psychology, selecting a program that aligns with your interests—and offers quality online learning—can set the stage for a rewarding career.

Best Scientists Citing Ute J. Bayen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles