World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
62
Citations
24939
World Ranking
1227
National Ranking
572

Edward C. Norton publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward C. Norton sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 254 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Edward C. Norton D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward C. Norton sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Edward C. Norton is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their primary field of study is Medicine, with a focus on subfields including General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Surgery, Statistics and Probability, and Sociology and Political Science.

The scientist's research covers a variety of topics related to healthcare and health outcomes. These include Healthcare Policy and Management, Primary Care and Health Outcomes, Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes, Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare, Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving, Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life, and Health Disparities and Outcomes.

Edward C. Norton has contributed to a number of recent publications. Some notable papers include "Comparative Safety of Robotic-Assisted vs Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy" (2023) published in JAMA Surgery, "Association between vitamin D supplementation and COVID-19 infection and mortality" (2022) in Scientific Reports, "Why TransformY? The Pitfalls of Transformed Regressions with a Mass at Zero*" (2023) in Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, "Family Care Availability And Implications For Informal And Formal Care Used By Adults With Dementia In The US" (2021) in Health Affairs, and "The inverse hyperbolic sine transformation and retransformed marginal effects" (2022) in The Stata Journal Promoting communications on statistics and Stata.

Frequent coauthors who have collaborated with Edward C. Norton include Vanessa K. Dalton, Erica E. Marsh, James M. Dupree, David Suh, and Phyllis Yan.

Edward C. Norton's publications appear frequently in venues such as:

  • UNC Libraries
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Fertility and Sterility
  • Health Services Research
  • The Journal of Urology

Best Publications

  • Interaction terms in logit and probit models

    Chunrong Ai;Edward C. Norton

  • Computing Interaction Effects and Standard Errors in Logit and Probit Models

    Edward C. Norton;Hua Wang;Chunrong Ai

  • Informal care and health care use of older adults.

    Courtney Harold Van Houtven;Edward C. Norton

  • Interaction terms in nonlinear models

    Pinar Karaca-Mandic;Edward C. Norton;Bryan Dowd

  • twopm: two-part models

    Federico Belotti;Partha Deb;Partha Deb;Willard G. Manning;Edward C. Norton;Edward C. Norton

  • School and Neighborhood Characteristics Associated with School Rates of Alcohol, Cigarette, and Marijuana Use

    Susan T. Ennett;Robert L. Flewelling;Richard C. Lindrooth;Edward C. Norton

  • Long-term Survival Following Partial vs Radical Nephrectomy Among Older Patients With Early-Stage Kidney Cancer

    Hung Jui Tan;Edward C. Norton;Zaojun Ye;Khaled S. Hafez

  • Why have physical activity levels declined among Chinese adults? Findings from the 1991-2006 China Health and Nutrition Surveys.

    Shu Wen Ng;Edward C. Norton;Barry M. Popkin

  • Modeling Health Care Expenditures and Use

    Partha Deb;Edward C. Norton

  • Longevity and Health Care Expenditures The Real Reasons Older People Spend More

    Zhou Yang;Edward C. Norton;Sally C. Stearns

  • Marginal Effects-Quantifying the Effect of Changes in Risk Factors in Logistic Regression Models.

    Edward C. Norton;Edward C. Norton;Bryan E. Dowd;Matthew L. Maciejewski;Matthew L. Maciejewski

  • How hospital ownership affects access to care for the uninsured.

    Edward C. Norton;Douglas O. Staiger

  • What's the Risk? A simple approach for estimating adjusted risk measures from nonlinear models including logistic regression.

    Lawrence C. Kleinman;Edward C. Norton

  • Time to include time to death? The future of health care expenditure predictions.

    Sally C. Stearns;Edward C. Norton

  • Computing Adjusted Risk Ratios and Risk Differences in Stata

    Edward C. Norton;Edward C. Norton;Morgen M. Miller;Lawrence C. Kleinman

  • Choosing Between and Interpreting the Heckit and Two-Part Models for Corner Solutions

    William H. Dow;Edward C. Norton

  • Adverse Selection, Bequests, Crowding Out, and Private Demand for Insurance: Evidence from the Long-term Care Insurance Market

    Frank A. Sloan;Edward C. Norton

  • Log Odds and the Interpretation of Logit Models.

    Edward C. Norton;Edward C. Norton;Bryan E. Dowd

  • Odds Ratios-Current Best Practice and Use.

    Edward C. Norton;Bryan E. Dowd;Matthew L. Maciejewski

  • Controlling for the endogeneity of peer substance use on adolescent alcohol and tobacco use.

    Edward C. Norton;Richard C. Lindrooth;Susan T. Ennett

  • Weight and wages: fat versus lean paychecks

    Euna Han;Edward C. Norton;Sally C. Stearns

  • Interaction Terms in Nonlinear Models

    Chunrong Ai;Edward C. Norton

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew M. Ryan
Andrew M. Ryan University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Justin B. Dimick
Justin B. Dimick University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Joseph P. Morrissey
Joseph P. Morrissey University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Gary A. Zarkin
Gary A. Zarkin Research Triangle Park Foundation
Sharon-Lise T. Normand
Sharon-Lise T. Normand Harvard University
John Cawley
John Cawley Cornell University
Susan T. Ennett
Susan T. Ennett University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Lisa M. Powell
Lisa M. Powell University of Illinois at Chicago
William H. Fisher
William H. Fisher University of Massachusetts Lowell
John D. Birkmeyer
John D. Birkmeyer University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The fields of Social Sciences and Humanities continue to evolve, and so do the flexible educational options for students. Earning an accelerated msw online can open doors to impactful roles in social work, allowing you to make a difference in various communities. Similarly, an accelerated psychology bachelor's degree online is perfect for those wanting to enter psychology or related disciplines at a faster pace.

For those interested in counseling, selecting a program from cacrep schools ensures you meet the highest professional standards in training and licensure preparation. If your career goal is to support families and couples, there are affordable online marriage and family therapy masters programs designed to provide both theoretical knowledge and hands-on experience.

These flexible, accredited online programs allow students to balance their studies with personal and professional commitments, making it easier than ever to advance your education and launch or enhance a meaningful career in the social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Edward C. Norton

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles