World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 85 14741 13883 1352 1292 440 22600

Leong L. Ng publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Leong L. Ng between 1982 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Leong L. Ng published across 45 years, from 1982 to 2026, averaging 11.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 42 publications in 2020. 8 of the 500 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 42. Peak 42 publications in 2020. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 7 publications 1988: 9 publications 1989: 10 publications 1990: 10 publications 1991: 11 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 10 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 15 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 16 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 18 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 22 publications 2019: 20 publications 2020: 42 publications 2021: 31 publications 2022: 24 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 7 publications 2026: 1 publication
1982 2026

500 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Leong L. Ng: publications per year, 1982 to 2026
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 0
1984 0
1985 4
1986 3
1987 7
1988 9
1989 10
1990 10
1991 11
1992 6
1993 4
1994 4
1995 10
1996 5
1997 5
1998 4
1999 6
2000 10
2001 4
2002 11
2003 15
2004 11
2005 16
2006 10
2007 18
2008 8
2009 12
2010 15
2011 11
2012 16
2013 16
2014 12
2015 12
2016 11
2017 20
2018 22
2019 20
2020 42
2021 31
2022 24
2023 14
2024 12
2025 7
2026 1
Total 500
Download as CSV

Leong L. Ng publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leong L. Ng sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 421–440 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 440 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806 440
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Leong L. Ng D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leong L. Ng sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 84–85 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003 85
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Leong L. Ng is affiliated with the University of Leicester in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, particularly in cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. Their work encompasses various subfields including molecular biology, radiology, nuclear medicine, imaging, physiology, and rheumatology.

The research topics addressed by Leong L. Ng cover a broad spectrum within cardiology and related areas. Key areas of focus include:

  • Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • GDF15 and Related Biomarkers
  • Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments

Leong L. Ng has coauthored publications frequently with several researchers, with the leading collaborators being:

  • Chim C. Lang
  • Adriaan A. Voors
  • Marco Metra
  • Kenneth Dickstein
  • Dirk J. van Veldhuisen

The scientist's work appears predominantly in several respected journals related to cardiology and heart failure research. The most common publication venues include:

  • European Journal of Heart Failure
  • ESC Heart Failure
  • European Heart Journal
  • Clinical Research in Cardiology
  • OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)

Recent selected papers by Leong L. Ng highlight topics of heart failure mechanisms, biomarker profiling, and clinical diagnostics. These include:

  • Circulating plasma concentrations of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 in men and women with heart failure and effects of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors, 2020, European Heart Journal
  • Machine learning based on biomarker profiles identifies distinct subgroups of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, 2021, European Journal of Heart Failure
  • Clinical Role of CA125 in Worsening Heart Failure, 2020, JACC Heart Failure
  • Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and outcomes in patients with new-onset or worsening heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fraction, 2021, ESC Heart Failure
  • Prevalence and Prognostic Significance of Microvascular Dysfunction in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction, 2022, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging

Through an extensive publication record encompassing over 250 works in medicine, and 120 specifically in cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, Leong L. Ng's contributions reflect a consistent research interest in heart failure and cardiovascular diagnostics, supported by multidisciplinary approaches involving molecular biology and imaging techniques.

Best Publications

  • N-Terminal Pro-B–Type Natriuretic Peptide and Long-Term Mortality in Acute Coronary Syndromes

    Torbjørn Omland;Anita Persson;Leong Ng;Russel O’Brien

  • Mid-region pro-hormone markers for diagnosis and prognosis in acute dyspnea : results from the BACH (Biomarkers in Acute Heart Failure) trial

    Alan Maisel;Christian Mueller;Richard Nowak;W. Frank Peacock

  • Circulating plasma concentrations of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 in men and women with heart failure and effects of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors.

    Iziah E. Sama;Alice Ravera;Alice Ravera;Bernadet T. Santema;Harry van Goor

  • Sildenafil versus Endothelin Receptor Antagonist for Pulmonary Hypertension (SERAPH) Study

    Martin R. Wilkins;Gideon A. Paul;Julian W. Strange;Nina Tunariu

  • C-Terminal Provasopressin (Copeptin) as a Novel and Prognostic Marker in Acute Myocardial Infarction Leicester Acute Myocardial Infarction Peptide (LAMP) Study

    Sohail Q. Khan;Onkar S. Dhillon;Russell J. O’Brien;Joachim Struck

  • Biomarkers in acute myocardial infarction.

    Daniel Chan;Leong L Ng

  • Determinants and clinical outcome of uptitration of ACE-inhibitors and beta-blockers in patients with heart failure: A prospective European study

    W Ouwerkerk;AA Voors;SD Anker;JG Cleland

  • Profile of plasma N-terminal proBNP following acute myocardial infarction; correlation with left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

    S Talwar;I B Squire;P F Downie;A M Mccullough

  • Plasma N terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide and cardiotrophin 1 are raised in unstable angina.

    S Talwar;I B Squire;P F Downie;J E Davies

  • Plasma matrix metalloproteinase-9 and left ventricular remodelling after acute myocardial infarction in man: a prospective cohort study

    Dominic Kelly;Gillian Cockerill;Leong L. Ng;Matt Thompson

  • Growth differentiation factor 15 as a prognostic marker in patients with acute myocardial infarction

    SQ Khan;K Ng;O Dhillon;D Kelly

  • Identifying Pathophysiological Mechanisms in Heart Failure With Reduced Versus Preserved Ejection Fraction

    Jasper Tromp;B. Daan Westenbrink;Wouter Ouwerkerk;Dirk J. van Veldhuisen

  • Development and validation of multivariable models to predict mortality and hospitalization in patients with heart failure.

    Adriaan A. Voors;Wouter Ouwerkerk;Faiez Zannad;Dirk J. van Veldhuisen

  • Plasma MMP-9 and MMP-2 following acute myocardial infarction in man: correlation with echocardiographic and neurohumoral parameters of left ventricular dysfunction

    Iain B Squire;Jon Evans;Leong L Ng;Ian M Loftus

  • The clinical significance of interleukin-6 in heart failure: results from the BIOSTAT-CHF study.

    George Markousis-Mavrogenis;Jasper Tromp;Wouter Ouwerkerk;Matt Devalaraja

  • Trimethylamine N-oxide and prognosis in acute heart failure

    Toru Suzuki;Liam M Heaney;Sanjay S Bhandari;Donald J L Jones

  • Increased 90-Day Mortality in Patients With Acute Heart Failure With Elevated Copeptin Secondary Results From the Biomarkers in Acute Heart Failure (BACH) Study

    Alan Maisel;Yang Xue;Kevin Shah;Christian Mueller

  • A systems BIOlogy Study to TAilored Treatment in Chronic Heart Failure : rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of BIOSTAT-CHF

    Adriaan A. Voors;Stefan D. Anker;John G. Cleland;Kenneth Dickstein;Kenneth Dickstein

  • Prognostic value of midregional pro-adrenomedullin in patients with acute myocardial infarction: the LAMP (Leicester Acute Myocardial Infarction Peptide) study.

    Sohail Q. Khan;R.J. O'Brien;Joachim Struck;Paulene A. Quinn

  • Identifying optimal doses of heart failure medications in men compared with women: a prospective, observational, cohort study

    Bernadet T Santema;Wouter Ouwerkerk;Jasper Tromp;Iziah E Sama

Frequent Co-Authors

Kenneth Dickstein
Kenneth Dickstein University of Bergen
Nilesh J. Samani
Nilesh J. Samani University of Leicester
Adriaan A. Voors
Adriaan A. Voors University Medical Center Groningen
John G.F. Cleland
John G.F. Cleland University of Glasgow
Gerasimos Filippatos
Gerasimos Filippatos National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Marco Metra
Marco Metra University of Brescia
Dirk J. van Veldhuisen
Dirk J. van Veldhuisen University Medical Center Groningen
Faiez Zannad
Faiez Zannad University of Lorraine
Piotr Ponikowski
Piotr Ponikowski Wrocław Medical University
Hans L. Hillege
Hans L. Hillege University Medical Center Groningen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a medical career in the USA no longer requires a traditional, on-campus route. Many students are now turning to flexible online programs to reach their goals faster. For nurses aiming to advance, asn to np programs provide a direct bridge from an associate degree to a nurse practitioner role, combining coursework and clinical experience. Those interested in leadership can pursue a cahme accredited online mha to prepare for management positions in healthcare organizations.

Nutrition science is another growing field, and earning a nutrition degree online opens doors to careers in wellness, public health, and dietetics. Flexibility is also key for working RNs: Some programs, such as rn to bsn no clinical hours, let students earn their bachelor’s without additional on-site clinical requirements.

Before enrolling, be sure to check program accreditation and state licensing regulations. Online pathways can fast-track your career, but choosing the right program is essential to meeting your professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Leong L. Ng

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles