World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
100
Citations
39620
World Ranking
8242
National Ranking
24

A. Mark Richards publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where A. Mark Richards sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 793 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

A. Mark Richards D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where A. Mark Richards sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 100 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

A. Mark Richards is affiliated with the National University of Singapore in Singapore and has a primary focus on medical research, particularly within cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. Their scholarly output includes over 600 publications centered in the field of Medicine, with significant contributions to subfields such as Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Molecular Biology, Surgery, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

Richards' research topics span a diverse range of heart-related conditions and physiological mechanisms. Key thematic areas include:

  • Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms
  • Cardiac Pacing and Defibrillation Studies
  • Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling

Recent published papers demonstrate active engagement in critical cardiovascular challenges and biomarker research. Among the papers are:

  • "A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Pharmacological Treatment of Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction," 2021, JACC Heart Failure
  • "Global burden of cardiovascular diseases: projections from 2025 to 2050," 2024, European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
  • "Circulating heart failure biomarkers beyond natriuretic peptides: review from the Biomarker Study Group of the Heart Failure Association (HFA), European Society of Cardiology (ESC)," 2021, European Journal of Heart Failure
  • "Congestion in heart failure: a circulating biomarker-based perspective. A review from the Biomarkers Working Group of the Heart Failure Association, European Society of Cardiology," 2022, European Journal of Heart Failure
  • "Machine learning for diagnosis of myocardial infarction using cardiac troponin concentrations," 2023, Nature Medicine

Frequent publication venues showcase Richards' consistent contributions to leading cardiovascular and medical journals, including:

  • European Heart Journal
  • Heart Lung and Circulation
  • European Journal of Heart Failure
  • Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Richards collaborates extensively with multiple co-authors, notably:

  • Richard W. Troughton
  • Chris Frampton
  • Robert N. Doughty
  • Carolyn S.P. Lam
  • Lieng Hsi Ling

In addition to journal articles, Richards has authored books published by Oxford University Press and SAE International eBooks. Titles include "A Practical Approach to Conveyancing" and "Property Law 2020-2021," both released in 2020, as well as the "Automotive Fuels Reference Book, Fourth Edition," published in 2023.

Best Publications

  • Treatment of heart failure guided by plasma aminoterminal brain natriuretic peptide (N-BNP) concentrations.

    Richard W Troughton;Christopher M Frampton;Timothy G Yandle;Eric A Espine

  • Immunoreactive amino‐terminal pro‐brain natriuretic peptide (NT‐PROBNP): a new marker of cardiac impairment

    P. J. Hunt;A. M. Richards;M. G. Nicholls;T. G. Yandle

  • Plasma brain natriuretic peptide in assessment of acute dyspnoea.

    M. Davis;E.A. Espiner;T. Yandle;G. Richards

  • B-Type Natriuretic Peptides and Ejection Fraction for Prognosis After Myocardial Infarction

    A. Mark Richards;M. Gary Nicholls;Eric A. Espiner;John G. Lainchbury

  • Plasma N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide and Adrenomedullin Prognostic Utility and Prediction of Benefit From Carvedilol in Chronic Ischemic Left Ventricular Dysfunction

    A.Mark Richards;Robert Doughty;M.Gary Nicholls;Stephen MacMahon

  • Brain natriuretic peptide and n-terminal brain natriuretic peptide in the diagnosis of heart failure in patients with acute shortness of breath

    John G Lainchbury;Elizabeth Campbell;Christopher M Frampton;Timothy G Yandle

  • RENAL, HAEMODYNAMIC, AND HORMONAL EFFECTS OF HUMAN ALPHA ATRIAL NATRIURETIC PEPTIDE IN HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS

    A.M. Richards;H. Ikram;T.G. Yandle;M.G. Nicholls

  • A 2-h diagnostic protocol to assess patients with chest pain symptoms in the Asia-Pacific region (ASPECT): a prospective observational validation study

    Martin Than;Louise Cullen;Louise Cullen;Christopher M. Reid;Swee Han Lim

  • Plasma concentrations of myeloperoxidase predict mortality after myocardial infarction.

    Tessa J. Mocatta;Anna P. Pilbrow;Vicky A. Cameron;Revathy Senthilmohan

  • Increased Plasma Natriuretic Peptide Levels Reflect Symptom Onset in Aortic Stenosis

    Ivor L. Gerber;Ralph A.H. Stewart;Malcolm E. Legget;Teena M. West

  • Validation of High-Sensitivity Troponin I in a 2-Hour Diagnostic Strategy to Assess 30-Day Outcomes in Emergency Department Patients With Possible Acute Coronary Syndrome

    Louise Cullen;Louise Cullen;Christian Mueller;William A. Parsonage;William A. Parsonage;Karin Wildi

  • Metabolic clearance rate and plasma half life of alpha-human atrial natriuretic peptide in man.

    T.G. Yandle;A.M. Richards;M.G. Nicholls;R. Cuneo

  • The Amino-Terminal Portion of Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (Pro-BNP) Circulates in Human Plasma

    P.J. Hunt;T.G. Yandle;M.G. Nicholls;A.M. Richards

  • Plasma B-type natriuretic peptide levels in systolic heart failure: importance of left ventricular diastolic function and right ventricular systolic function.

    Richard W Troughton;David L Prior;Jeremy J Pereira;Maureen Martin

  • Large-Scale Gene-Centric Analysis Identifies Novel Variants for Coronary Artery Disease

    Adam S. Butterworth;Peter S. Braund;Martin Farrall;Robert J. Hardwick

  • Coenzyme Q10: An Independent Predictor of Mortality in Chronic Heart Failure

    Sarah L. Molyneux;Christopher M. Florkowski;Peter M. George;Anna P. Pilbrow

  • Neurohumoral Prediction of Benefit From Carvedilol in Ischemic Left Ventricular Dysfunction

    A. M. Richards;R. Doughty;M. G. Nicholls;S. Macmahon

  • Effect of B-type natriuretic peptide-guided treatment of chronic heart failure on total mortality and hospitalization: an individual patient meta-analysis

    Richard W. Troughton;Christopher M. Frampton;Hans-Peter Brunner-La Rocca;Matthias Pfisterer

  • Rapid Rule-out of Acute Myocardial Infarction With a Single High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Measurement Below the Limit of Detection: A Collaborative Meta-analysis

    John W Pickering;Martin P Than;Louise Cullen;Sally Aldous

  • Right ventricular dysfunction in left-sided heart failure with preserved versus reduced ejection fraction.

    Lena Bosch;Carolyn S.P. Lam;Lingli Gong;Siew Pang Chan

Frequent Co-Authors

Timothy G. Yandle
Timothy G. Yandle University of Otago
Chris Frampton
Chris Frampton University of Otago
Carolyn S.P. Lam
Carolyn S.P. Lam National University of Singapore
Inder S. Anand
Inder S. Anand University of Minnesota
James L. Januzzi
James L. Januzzi Harvard University
Winfried März
Winfried März Medical University of Graz
W.H. Wilson Tang
W.H. Wilson Tang Cleveland Clinic
Antoni Bayes-Genis
Antoni Bayes-Genis Autonomous University of Barcelona
Michael V. Holmes
Michael V. Holmes University of Oxford
Christopher P. Nelson
Christopher P. Nelson University of Leicester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in exploring alternative or complementary paths in the medical field? Online education offers flexible, affordable options for launching or advancing your healthcare career.

If you’re drawn to the administrative side of healthcare, a health information management degree online provides the skills to organize and maintain important patient and data records. For those seeking a specialized, fast-track entry, consider a medical billing and coding certification online to prepare for vital roles in healthcare documentation and insurance processing.

Nurses remain in high demand, and flexible online options are making this career path more accessible than ever. Enrolling in cheap online nursing programs can be a cost-effective way to enter the profession or upskill. If you’re already a registered nurse and want more responsibility, leadership, or clinical autonomy, the cheapest np school programs online allow you to become a nurse practitioner without putting your career on hold.

Each of these online pathways offers specific advantages and can open doors to meaningful, rewarding careers in the evolving field of medicine.

Best Scientists Citing A. Mark Richards

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles