World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
38
Citations
7882
World Ranking
2299
National Ranking
972

Donald E. Myers publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donald E. Myers sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 82 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 115 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Donald E. Myers D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donald E. Myers sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 137 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Donald E. Myers is a researcher affiliated with the University of Arizona in the United States. Their academic work focuses primarily on Environmental Science, with a specialization in Environmental Engineering. The core areas of study encompass Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications as well as Soil Geostatistics and Mapping.

Within their research career, Myers has contributed to publications in recognized venues, notably the journal Technometrics. A recent publication includes the paper titled Modelling Spatial and Spatial-Temporal Data: A Bayesian Approach, published in 2020 in Technometrics.

Their scholarly collaborations include frequent co-authorship with colleagues such as Sandra De Iaco and D. Posa, each listed as repeated co-authors on three occasions.

Myers's research topics reflect an engagement with spatial data modeling and geostatistical methods, particularly emphasizing Bayesian approaches in spatial and spatial-temporal contexts. This aligns with the broader environmental science framework and engineering applications targeting environmental monitoring and data interpretation.

  • Modelling Spatial and Spatial-Temporal Data: A Bayesian Approach (2020, Technometrics)

  • Sandra De Iaco
  • D. Posa

  • Technometrics

  • Environmental Science

  • Environmental Engineering

  • Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
  • Soil Geostatistics and Mapping

Best Publications

  • The consequences of spatial structure for the design and analysis of ecological field surveys

    Pierre Legendre;Mark R. T. Dale;Marie-Josée Fortin;Jessica Gurevitch

  • Matrix formulation of co-kriging

    Donald E. Myers

  • Conceptual and mathematical relationships among methods for spatial analysis

    Mark R T Dale;Philip Dixon;Marie Josée Fortin;Pierre Legendre

  • Geostatistical Methods Applied to Soil Science

    A. W. Warrick;D. E. Myers;D. R. Nielsen

  • Optimization of Sampling Locations for Variogram Calculations

    A. W. Warrick;D. E. Myers

  • Spatial interpolation: an overview

    Donald E. Myers

  • Space–time analysis using a general product–sum model

    S.De Iaco;D.E. Myers;D. Posa

  • Estimating and modeling space–time correlation structures

    L.De Cesare;D.E Myers;D Posa

  • Geostatistically modeling stem size and increment in an old-growth forest

    Franco Biondi;Donald E. Myers;Charles C. Avery

  • Problems in space-time kriging of geohydrological data

    Shahrokh Rouhani;Donald E. Myers

  • To be or not to be... stationary? That is the question

    D. E. Myers

  • Nonseparable Space-Time Covariance Models: Some Parametric Families

    S. De Iaco;D. E. Myers;D. Posa

  • Pseudo-cross variograms, positive-definiteness, and cokriging

    Donald E. Myers

  • Product‐sum covariance for space‐time modeling: an environmental application

    L De Cesare;D.E Myers;D Posa

  • Interpolation and estimation with spatially located data

    Donald E. Myers

  • Estimation of linear combinations and co-kriging

    Donald E. Myers

  • Co-Kriging — New Developments

    Donald E. Myers

  • Variograms with zonal anisotropies and noninvertible kriging systems

    Donald E. Myers;Andre Journel

  • Kriging, cokriging, radial basis functions and the role of positive definiteness

    Donald E. Myers

  • FORTRAN programs for space-time modeling

    L. De Cesare;D. E. Myers;D. Posa

  • Linear and Generalized Linear Mixed Models and Their Applications

    Donald E Myers

Frequent Co-Authors

Soroosh Sorooshian
Soroosh Sorooshian University of California, Irvine
Franco Biondi
Franco Biondi University of Nevada Reno
David C. Goodrich
David C. Goodrich US Department of Agriculture
Alfred Stein
Alfred Stein University of Twente
Philip M. Dixon
Philip M. Dixon Iowa State University
J.J.K. Daemen
J.J.K. Daemen University of Nevada Reno

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Mathematics degree in the USA opens doors to diverse career opportunities across finance, business, and marketing sectors. Many students complement their math background with advanced online programs tailored for quick career advancement and affordability.

For those interested in the financial industry, exploring cheap online masters in finance can provide a cost-effective path to gaining in-depth financial expertise while leveraging your mathematical skills.

If you want to fast-track your leadership potential, consider accelerated online mba programs. These programs allow you to earn an MBA in a shorter timeframe, ideal for mathematics graduates aiming to enter management roles rapidly.

Marketing professionals with a quantitative edge may find value in an ms in digital marketing degree cost usa. This degree blends marketing analytics and digital strategies, enabling math-savvy students to tap into a growing industry.

Additionally, many opt for a one year mba to quickly enhance business acumen and quantitative decision-making skills, further diversifying their career options. These related degrees offer practical pathways to maximize the potential of a mathematics education.

Best Scientists Citing Donald E. Myers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles