World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
73
Citations
18578
World Ranking
1976
National Ranking
1155

Susan T. Ennett publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Susan T. Ennett sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 182 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Susan T. Ennett D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Susan T. Ennett sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Susan T. Ennett is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the United States. Their research contributions span multiple disciplines focused on social and health sciences. The primary fields of study associated with their work include Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Health, and Social Psychology.

Their work addresses several key topics within these disciplines, such as:

  • Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Psychosocial Factors Impacting Youth
  • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Ennett cover a range of public health and behavioral topics. These include:

  • "Effect of the Smart Moms intervention on targeted mediators of change in child sugar-sweetened beverage intake," 2020, Public Health
  • "A Multidimensional Model of Sexual Empowerment Among Young Black Men Who have Sex with Men: A Latent Profile Analysis," 2020, AIDS and Behavior
  • "Snacking, sugar-sweetened beverage consumption and child obesity in low-income households," 2020, Nutrition & Food Science
  • "Letting Children Sip: Understanding Why Parents Allow Alcohol Use by Elementary School-aged Children," 2020, UNC Libraries
  • "Adolescent aggression: The role of peer group status motives, peer aggression, and group characteristics," 2020, UNC Libraries

Ennett has frequently published in a variety of venues, with notable contributions to:

  • UNC Libraries
  • Public Health
  • AIDS and Behavior
  • Nutrition & Food Science
  • Journal of Research on Adolescence

Collaborative work is a significant aspect of Ennett's research, with frequent coauthors including:

  • Vangie A. Foshee (33 coauthored papers)
  • H. Luz McNaughton Reyes (13 coauthored papers)
  • Nisha C. Gottfredson (10 coauthored papers)
  • Andrea M. Hussong (10 coauthored papers)
  • Chirayath Suchindran (8 coauthored papers)

Best Publications

  • How effective is drug abuse resistance education? A meta-analysis of Project DARE outcome evaluations.

    Susan T. Ennett;Nancy S. Tobler;Christopher L. Ringwalt;Robert L. Flewelling

  • The contribution of influence and selection to adolescent peer group homogeneity: The case of adolescent cigarette smoking.

    Susan T. Ennett;Karl E. Bauman

  • On the importance of peer influence for adolescent drug use: commonly neglected considerations

    Karl E. Bauman;Susan T. Ennett

  • Assessing the Long-Term Effects of the Safe Dates Program and a Booster in Preventing and Reducing Adolescent Dating Violence Victimization and Perpetration

    Vangie A. Foshee;Karl E. Bauman;Susan T. Ennett;G. Fletcher Linder

  • Prevalence and correlates of survival sex among runaway and homeless youth.

    Jody M. Greene;Susan T. Ennett;Christopher L. Ringwalt

  • The Peer Context of Adolescent Substance Use: Findings from Social Network Analysis

    Susan T Ennett;Karl E. Bauman;Andrea M Hussong;Robert Faris

  • School and Neighborhood Characteristics Associated with School Rates of Alcohol, Cigarette, and Marijuana Use

    Susan T. Ennett;Robert L. Flewelling;Richard C. Lindrooth;Edward C. Norton

  • Peer group structure and adolescent cigarette smoking: a social network analysis.

    Susan T. Ennett;Karl E. Bauman

  • Assessing the effects of the dating violence prevention program "safe dates" using random coefficient regression modeling.

    Vangie A Foshee;Karl E. Bauman;Susan T Ennett;Chirayath M Suchindran

  • Parent‐Child Communication About Adolescent Tobacco and Alcohol Use: What Do Parents Say and Does It Affect Youth Behavior?

    Susan T. Ennett;Karl E. Bauman;Vangie A. Foshee;Michael Pemberton

  • A comparison of current practice in school-based substance use prevention programs with meta-analysis findings.

    Susan T. Ennett;Christopher L. Ringwalt;Judy Thorne;Louise Ann Rohrbach

  • Longitudinal predictors of serious physical and sexual dating violence victimization during adolescence.

    Vangie Ann Foshee;Thad Steven Benefield;Susan T. Ennett;Karl E. Bauman

  • Factors Associated with Fidelity to Substance Use Prevention Curriculum Guides in the Nation's Middle Schools:

    Christopher L. Ringwalt;Susan Ennett;Ruby Johnson;Louise Ann Rohrbach

  • Substance use among runaway and homeless youth in three national samples.

    Jody M. Greene;Susan T Ennett;Christopher L. Ringwalt

  • Social network characteristics associated with risky behaviors among runaway and homeless youth.

    Susan T. Ennett;S. L. Bailey;E. B. Federman

  • Neighborhood Influences on Adolescent Cigarette and Alcohol Use: Mediating Effects through Parent and Peer Behaviors∗:

    Ying Chih Chuang;Susan T. Ennett;Karl E. Bauman;Vangie A. Foshee

  • Controlling for the endogeneity of peer substance use on adolescent alcohol and tobacco use.

    Edward C. Norton;Richard C. Lindrooth;Susan T. Ennett

  • The social ecology of adolescent alcohol misuse.

    Susan T. Ennett;Vangie A. Foshee;Karl E. Bauman;Andrea Hussong

  • The efficacy of a daily self-weighing weight loss intervention using smart scales and e-mail.

    Dori M. Steinberg;Dori M. Steinberg;Deborah F. Tate;Gary G. Bennett;Susan Ennett

  • A longitudinal examination of psychological, behavioral, academic, and relationship consequences of dating abuse victimization among a primarily rural sample of adolescents

    Vangie Ann Foshee;Heath Luz Mc Naughton Reyes;Nisha C. Gottfredson;Ling Yin Chang

  • Substance use and risky sexual behavior among homeless and runaway youth.

    Susan L. Bailey;Carol S. Camlin;Susan T. Ennett

Frequent Co-Authors

Vangie A. Foshee
Vangie A. Foshee University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Andrea M. Hussong
Andrea M. Hussong University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Carolyn Tucker Halpern
Carolyn Tucker Halpern University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Edwin B. Fisher
Edwin B. Fisher University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
José A. Bauermeister
José A. Bauermeister University of Pennsylvania
Brett C. Haberstick
Brett C. Haberstick University of Colorado Boulder
Linda M. Chatters
Linda M. Chatters University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Antonio A. Morgan-Lopez
Antonio A. Morgan-Lopez RTI International
Lisa B. Hightow-Weidman
Lisa B. Hightow-Weidman University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Kari E. North
Kari E. North University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens many doors in counseling, therapy, research, and related fields. If you're interested in becoming a Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC) in the USA, it’s important to understand that licensure requirements vary significantly by state. For instance, Mississippi lpc licensure requirements detail state-specific education, supervised experience, and examination prerequisites.

Similarly, those researching lpc license requirements in Missouri will find unique criteria for coursework, internships, and licensure exams. If you want to practice in another region, such as understanding how to get an lpc license in Montana or how to get an lpc license in Nebraska, it is vital to research each state’s rules.

Many universities offer online psychology degrees tailored to meet these state requirements, helping students prepare for the necessary academic and practical steps. Exploring online degree options and understanding each state’s pathway will empower you to achieve your professional goals in counseling and mental health services.

Best Scientists Citing Susan T. Ennett

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles