| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | Current World Ranking | National Ranking | Current National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Molecular Biology | 49 | 2639 | 2389 | 7 | 7 | 181 | 7725 |
The chart shows the history of publications by Michal Dadlez between 1986 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michal Dadlez published across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025, averaging 5.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2016. 12 of the 229 publications appeared in the last two years.
229 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1986 | 1 |
| 1987 | 0 |
| 1988 | 1 |
| 1989 | 0 |
| 1990 | 0 |
| 1991 | 1 |
| 1992 | 0 |
| 1993 | 0 |
| 1994 | 0 |
| 1995 | 1 |
| 1996 | 1 |
| 1997 | 2 |
| 1998 | 2 |
| 1999 | 5 |
| 2000 | 5 |
| 2001 | 2 |
| 2002 | 3 |
| 2003 | 5 |
| 2004 | 4 |
| 2005 | 0 |
| 2006 | 4 |
| 2007 | 3 |
| 2008 | 3 |
| 2009 | 9 |
| 2010 | 6 |
| 2011 | 9 |
| 2012 | 6 |
| 2013 | 13 |
| 2014 | 14 |
| 2015 | 14 |
| 2016 | 20 |
| 2017 | 15 |
| 2018 | 15 |
| 2019 | 13 |
| 2020 | 16 |
| 2021 | 11 |
| 2022 | 6 |
| 2023 | 7 |
| 2024 | 2 |
| 2025 | 10 |
| Total | 229 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michal Dadlez sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 181 publications — 51st percentile
51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 47–56 | 7 | |
| 57–66 | 17 | |
| 67–76 | 65 | |
| 77–86 | 90 | |
| 87–96 | 125 | |
| 97–106 | 131 | |
| 107–116 | 162 | |
| 117–126 | 177 | |
| 127–136 | 158 | |
| 137–146 | 158 | |
| 147–156 | 146 | |
| 157–166 | 159 | |
| 167–176 | 131 | |
| 177–186 | 110 | 181 |
| 187–196 | 112 | |
| 197–206 | 100 | |
| 207–216 | 89 | |
| 217–226 | 98 | |
| 227–236 | 74 | |
| 237–246 | 72 | |
| 247–256 | 63 | |
| 257–266 | 53 | |
| 267–276 | 54 | |
| 277–286 | 49 | |
| 287–296 | 52 | |
| 297–306 | 43 | |
| 307–316 | 46 | |
| 317–326 | 41 | |
| 327–336 | 42 | |
| 337–346 | 31 | |
| 347–356 | 28 | |
| 357–366 | 29 | |
| 367–376 | 26 | |
| 377–386 | 24 | |
| 387–396 | 24 | |
| 397–406 | 14 | |
| 407–416 | 13 | |
| 417–426 | 20 | |
| 427–436 | 12 | |
| 437–446 | 20 | |
| 447–456 | 11 | |
| 457–466 | 10 | |
| 467–476 | 14 | |
| 477–486 | 14 | |
| 487–496 | 10 | |
| 497–506 | 13 | |
| 507–516 | 13 | |
| 517–526 | 2 | |
| 527–536 | 4 | |
| 537–546 | 6 | |
| 547–556 | 8 | |
| 557–563 | 6 | |
| 564+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michal Dadlez sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 49 D-Index — 16th percentile
16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 40–41 | 36 | |
| 42–43 | 101 | |
| 44–45 | 115 | |
| 46–47 | 121 | |
| 48–49 | 118 | 49 |
| 50–51 | 130 | |
| 52–53 | 106 | |
| 54–55 | 116 | |
| 56–57 | 113 | |
| 58–59 | 129 | |
| 60–61 | 120 | |
| 62–63 | 105 | |
| 64–65 | 131 | |
| 66–67 | 95 | |
| 68–69 | 97 | |
| 70–71 | 106 | |
| 72–73 | 83 | |
| 74–75 | 89 | |
| 76–77 | 77 | |
| 78–79 | 70 | |
| 80–81 | 73 | |
| 82–83 | 60 | |
| 84–85 | 48 | |
| 86–87 | 45 | |
| 88–89 | 50 | |
| 90–91 | 31 | |
| 92–93 | 51 | |
| 94–95 | 43 | |
| 96–97 | 38 | |
| 98–99 | 39 | |
| 100–101 | 41 | |
| 102–103 | 29 | |
| 104–105 | 33 | |
| 106–107 | 35 | |
| 108–109 | 20 | |
| 110–111 | 38 | |
| 112–113 | 19 | |
| 114–115 | 28 | |
| 116–117 | 13 | |
| 118–119 | 23 | |
| 120–121 | 16 | |
| 122–123 | 15 | |
| 124–125 | 11 | |
| 126–127 | 21 | |
| 128–129 | 7 | |
| 130–131 | 13 | |
| 132–133 | 14 | |
| 134–135 | 17 | |
| 136–137 | 9 | |
| 138–139 | 8 | |
| 140–141 | 16 | |
| 142–143 | 7 | |
| 144 | 7 | |
| 145+ | 100 |
Michal Dadlez is affiliated with the Polish Academy of Sciences in Poland and has contributed extensively to research in the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology as well as Medicine. Their work spans a variety of subfields including Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Spectroscopy, Immunology, and Immunology and Allergy.
The topics covered in their research include:
Michal Dadlez has published multiple papers, some of the notable recent works are:
Frequent co-authors collaborating with Michal Dadlez include:
The primary publication venues for Michal Dadlez's research are:
Anna Niedzwiecka;Joseph Marcotrigiano;Janusz Stepinski;Marzena Jankowska-Anyszka
Marcin R. Przewloka;Zsolt Venkei;Victor M. Bolanos-Garcia;Janusz Debski
Marcin Ufnal;Radoslaw Jazwiec;Michal Dadlez;Adrian Drapala
Nikola S. Dzhindzhev;George Tzolovsky;Zoltan Lipinszki;Sandra Schneider
Zbigniew Dominski;Xiao Cui Yang;Handan Kaygun;Michal Dadlez
Olivier Arnaiz;Agata Malinowska;Catherine Klotz;Linda Sperling
Joanna Zuberek;Aleksandra Wyslouch-Cieszynska;Anna Niedzwiecka;Michal Dadlez;Michal Dadlez
Ronny Helland;Jacek Otlewski;Ottar Sundheim;Michal Dadlez
Izabela Wawer;Izabela Wawer;Maria Bucholc;Jéremy Astier;Anna Anielska-Mazur
Daniel Krowarsch;Michal Dadlez;Olga Buczek;Izabela Krokoszynska
Cyril Thouverey;Agata Malinowska;Marcin Balcerzak;Agnieszka Strzelecka-Kiliszek
Michal Mikula;Tymon Rubel;Jakub Karczmarski;Krzysztof Goryca
Marcin Balcerzak;Agata Malinowska;Cyril Thouverey;Cyril Thouverey;Anna Sekrecka
Marcin Kłoniecki;Agnieszka Jabłonowska;Jarosław Poznański;James Langridge
Michał Mikula;Artur Dzwonek;Jakub Karczmarski;Tymon Rubel
Tomasz Huc;Adrian Drapala;Marta Gawrys;Marek Konop
Wlodzimierz Tszyrsznic;Agnieszka Borowiec;Emilia Pawlowska;Radoslaw Jazwiec
Jolanta Polanowska;Izabela Krokoszynska;Honorata Czapinska;Wieslaw Watorek
Daniel Buszewicz;Rafał Archacki;Rafał Archacki;Antoni Palusiński;Maciej Kotliński
Marcin R. Przewloka;Zsolt Venkei;Victor M. Bolanos-Garcia;Janusz Debski
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
Exploring a degree in Molecular Biology opens doors to numerous diverse and exciting career paths. Many students pursue science-related professions, but there are also thriving opportunities beyond the laboratory—including interdisciplinary and creative roles.
For instance, educators interested in communication disorders might consider transitioning from teacher to speech and language therapist. This pathway combines a science background with compassion and real-world impact.
Creative minds can blend scientific knowledge with design skills by enrolling in the best online graphic design degree programs, bringing a unique perspective to science communication and visual storytelling.
Those intrigued by structure, design, and research may explore architecture. Earning an architecture degree online allows science graduates to apply analytical skills in innovative ways within the built environment.
Additionally, students with a strong aptitude for problem-solving and quantitative analysis might consider one of the online mathematics degrees. This path supports careers in biotech, data science, or scientific research.
By exploring related online degrees and flexible study options, students can customize their learning experience to best align with their personal interests and professional ambitions.
Fudan University
University of Bristol
Italian Institute of Technology
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
University of Connecticut
Medical University of South Carolina
Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine
National Institutes of Health
Sapienza University of Rome
Aalto University
IMT Nord Europe
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
University of Arizona
Lundquist Institute
Montana State University
