World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Biology and Biochemistry
Poland
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
59
Citations
13423
World Ranking
12465
National Ranking
14

Agnieszka Chacinska publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Agnieszka Chacinska sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 125 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Agnieszka Chacinska D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Agnieszka Chacinska sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Biology and Biochemistry in Poland Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Biology and Biochemistry in Poland Leader Award
  • 2018 - Member of Academia Europaea
  • 2016 - Polish Academy of Science
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)

Overview

Agnieszka Chacinska is affiliated with the IMol Polish Academy of Sciences in Poland and specializes in research within Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. The primary focus of their work lies in Molecular Biology, with contributions also spanning Cell Biology, Clinical Biochemistry, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, and Aging.

The scientist's research covers several main topics, notably:

  • Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
  • Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • ATP Synthase and ATPases Research
  • Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease
  • Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
  • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases

Agnieszka Chacinska has published frequently in venues such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Molecular Biology
  • EMBO Reports
  • FEBS Letters
  • Trends in Biochemical Sciences

Recent papers reflect a continued engagement with mitochondrial biology and protein homeostasis. Examples include:

  • Cytosolic aggregation of mitochondrial proteins disrupts cellular homeostasis by stimulating the aggregation of other proteins (2021) published in eLife
  • Mitochondrial protein biogenesis in the synapse is supported by local translation (2020) published in EMBO Reports
  • Muscle-derived exophers promote reproductive fitness (2021) published in EMBO Reports
  • COA6 Facilitates Cytochrome c Oxidase Biogenesis as Thiol-reductase for Copper Metallochaperones in Mitochondria (2020) published in Journal of Molecular Biology
  • The ubiquitin-proteasome system and its crosstalk with mitochondria as therapeutic targets in medicine (2020) published in Pharmacological Research

Frequent co-authors in their body of work include:

  • M Wasilewski
  • Ben Hur Marins Mussulini
  • Remigiusz A. Serwa
  • Bettina Warscheid
  • Vanessa Linke

Agnieszka Chacinska has been recognized by several awards and memberships such as:

  • Member of Academia Europaea (2018)
  • Polish Academy of Science (2016)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)

Best Publications

  • Importing Mitochondrial Proteins: Machineries and Mechanisms

    Agnieszka Chacinska;Carla M Koehler;Dusanka Milenkovic;Trevor James Lithgow

  • The proteome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mitochondria

    Albert Sickmann;Jörg Reinders;Yvonne Wagner;Cornelia Joppich

  • Essential role of Mia40 in import and assembly of mitochondrial intermembrane space proteins.

    Agnieszka Chacinska;Sylvia Pfannschmidt;Nils Wiedemann;Vera Kozjak

  • Machinery for protein sorting and assembly in the mitochondrial outer membrane

    Nils Wiedemann;Vera Kozjak;Agnieszka Chacinska;Birgit Schönfisch

  • Dual Role of Mitofilin in Mitochondrial Membrane Organization and Protein Biogenesis

    Karina von der Malsburg;Judith M. Müller;Maria Bohnert;Silke Oeljeklaus

  • Mitochondrial presequence translocase: switching between TOM tethering and motor recruitment involves Tim21 and Tim17.

    Agnieszka Chacinska;Maria Lind;Maria Lind;Ann E. Frazier;Jan Dudek

  • Mistargeted mitochondrial proteins activate a proteostatic response in the cytosol

    Lidia Wrobel;Ulrike Topf;Piotr Bragoszewski;Sebastian Wiese;Sebastian Wiese

  • The Mitochondrial Presequence Translocase: An Essential Role of Tim50 in Directing Preproteins to the Import Channel

    Andreas Geissler;Agnieszka Chacinska;Kaye N. Truscott;Nils Wiedemann

  • The Mitochondrial Morphology Protein Mdm10 Functions in Assembly of the Preprotein Translocase of the Outer Membrane

    Chris Meisinger;Michael Rissler;Agnieszka Chacinska;Luiza K.Sanjuán Szklarz

  • Uniform nomenclature for the mitochondrial contact site and cristae organizing system

    Nikolaus Pfanner;Martin van der Laan;Paolo Amati;Roderick A. Capaldi

  • Tim50 maintains the permeability barrier of the mitochondrial inner membrane.

    Michael Meinecke;Richard Wagner;Peter Kovermann;Bernard Guiard

  • Quantitative proteomics identifies redox switches for global translation modulation by mitochondrially produced reactive oxygen species.

    Ulrike Topf;Ida Suppanz;Lukasz Samluk;Lukasz Samluk;Lidia Wrobel

  • Novel Mitochondrial Intermembrane Space Proteins as Substrates of the MIA Import Pathway

    Kipros Gabriel;Dusanka Milenkovic;Agnieszka Chacinska;Judith M Muller

  • The essential mitochondrial protein Erv1 cooperates with Mia40 in biogenesis of intermembrane space proteins.

    Michael Rissler;Nils Wiedemann;Sylvia Pfannschmidt;Kipros Gabriel

  • Intermembrane Space Proteome of Yeast Mitochondria

    F.-Nora Vögtle;Julia M. Burkhart;Sanjana Rao;Carolin Gerbeth

  • Identification of the Signal Directing Tim9 and Tim10 into the Intermembrane Space of Mitochondria

    Dusanka Milenkovic;Thomas Ramming;Judith M. Müller;Lena-Sophie Wenz

  • The morphology proteins Mdm12/Mmm1 function in the major β-barrel assembly pathway of mitochondria

    Chris Meisinger;Sylvia Pfannschmidt;Michael Rissler;Dusanka Milenkovic

  • Mitochondrial translocation contact sites: separation of dynamic and stabilizing elements in formation of a TOM–TIM–preprotein supercomplex

    Agnieszka Chacinska;Peter Rehling;Bernard Guiard;Ann E. Frazier

  • The mitochondrial import protein Mim1 promotes biogenesis of multispanning outer membrane proteins

    Thomas Becker;Lena-Sophie Wenz;Vivien Krüger;Vivien Krüger;Waltraut Lehmann

  • Control of mitochondrial biogenesis and function by the ubiquitin-proteasome system.

    Piotr Bragoszewski;Michal Turek;Agnieszka Chacinska;Agnieszka Chacinska

Frequent Co-Authors

Nikolaus Pfanner
Nikolaus Pfanner University of Freiburg
Peter Rehling
Peter Rehling University of Göttingen
Bernard Guiard
Bernard Guiard Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Chris Meisinger
Chris Meisinger University of Freiburg
Nils Wiedemann
Nils Wiedemann University of Freiburg
Martin van der Laan
Martin van der Laan Saarland University
Helmut E. Meyer
Helmut E. Meyer Ruhr University Bochum
Bettina Warscheid
Bettina Warscheid University of Freiburg
Thomas Becker
Thomas Becker Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Albert Sickmann
Albert Sickmann Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry creates opportunities to enter diverse health science fields. For those interested in technology and patient care, rad tech online programs provide a gateway to working with diagnostic imaging in clinical settings.

Nutrition and human health are closely tied to biochemistry. If you want to become a licensed nutrition expert, registered dietitian masters programs offer advanced credentials and knowledge to work in hospitals, clinics, or wellness organizations.

For a quicker path into healthcare, an online medical assisting school can prepare you to support both medical and administrative tasks in doctors’ offices and clinics—ideal for gaining practical skills after your initial studies.

Those already working as Medical Assistants can take their career further through an ma to lpn bridge program, advancing toward Licensed Practical Nurse status through flexible, online study.

Whether looking for technical, nutritional, or hands-on medical pathways, Biology and Biochemistry graduates have a wide range of online options for further specialization and career growth.

Best Scientists Citing Agnieszka Chacinska

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles