World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
60
Citations
14038
World Ranking
1464
National Ranking
273

Tom Cox publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tom Cox sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 246 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Tom Cox D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tom Cox sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tom Cox is affiliated with the University of Nottingham in the United Kingdom and has contributed to research spanning engineering and health professions. Their work intersects subfields including general health professions, electrical and electronic engineering, building and construction, environmental engineering, and atomic and molecular physics, and optics.

Their recent publications cover a range of topics such as healthcare professionals' stress and burnout, workplace health and well-being, gyrotron and vacuum electronics research, intensive care unit cognitive disorders, anesthesia and sedative agents, employment and welfare studies, and building energy and comfort optimization.

Notable recent papers include:

  • Doctors' working conditions, wellbeing and hospital quality of care: A multilevel analysis (2020) published in Safety Science
  • Dexmedetomidine- or Clonidine-Based Sedation Compared With Propofol in Critically Ill Patients (2025) published in JAMA
  • Field testing of the QUB method for assessing the thermal performance of dwellings: In situ measurements of the heat transfer coefficient of a circa 1950s detached house in UK (2020) published in Energy and Buildings
  • Work-related factors in the etiology of symptoms of post-traumatic stress among first responders: the Brazilian Firefighters Longitudinal Health Study (FLoHS) (2021) published in Cadernos de Saúde Pública
  • Returning to clinical work and doctors' personal, social and organisational needs: a systematic review (2022) published in BMJ Open

Frequent co-authors with whom Tom Cox has collaborated include:

  • Timothy Walsh
  • Kevin Teoh
  • David Hope
  • Nazir Lone
  • John Norrie

Their publications have appeared regularly in venues such as Energy and Buildings, JAMA, Safety Science, BMJ Open, and Cadernos de Saúde Pública.

Their work on healthcare professionals' stress and burnout and workplace health and well-being reflects interdisciplinary research across both health and engineering domains. Simultaneously, contributions to topics like gyrotron and vacuum electronics research and building energy optimization reveal a broad engagement with engineering complexities.

Tom Cox's research outputs demonstrate a blend of clinical, environmental, and technical perspectives that contribute to understanding and improving both healthcare settings and engineering applications.

Best Publications

  • Exploratory Factor Analysis: A Users’Guide

    Eamonn Ferguson;Tom Cox

  • The structure of employee attitudes to safety: A European example

    Sue Cox;Tom Cox

  • An inventory for the measurement of self‐reported stress and arousal

    Colin Mackay;Tom Cox;Grenville Burrows;Tony Lazzerini

  • The cost of work-related stress to society: a systematic review

    Juliet Hassard;Kevin R. H. Teoh;Gintare Visockaite;Philip Dewe

  • Burnout, Health, Work Stress, and Organizational Healthiness

    Tom Cox;George Kuk;Michael P. Leiter

  • Psychosocial factors predicting employee sickness absence during economic decline

    M Kivimäki;J Vahtera;L Thomson;A Griffiths

  • Relationship between work stress and body mass index among 45,810 female and male employees

    Anne Kouvonen;Mika Kivimäki;Sara J Cox;Tom Cox

  • The Appraisal of Life Events (ALE) scale: Reliability and validity

    Eamonn Ferguson;Gerald Matthews;Tom Cox

  • Individual strategies for coping with stress at work: A review

    Philip Dewe;Tom Cox;Eamonn Ferguson

  • Rail passenger crowding, stress, health and safety in Britain

    Tom Cox;Jonathan Houdmont;Amanda Griffiths

  • The future of organizational interventions: addressing the challenges of today's organizations

    Karina Nielsen;Toon W. Taris;Tom Cox

  • Psychometric evaluation of a short measure of social capital at work

    Anne Kouvonen;Mika Kivimäki;Mika Kivimäki;Jussi Vahtera;Tuula Oksanen

  • Psychosocial factors and psychophysiological mechanisms in the aetiology and development of cancers

    Tom Cox;Colin Mackay

  • Evaluating organizational-level work stress interventions: Beyond traditional methods

    Tom Cox;Maria Karanika;Amanda Griffiths;Jonathan Houdmont

  • Safety, Systems and People

    Sue Cox;Tom Cox

  • The nature and measurement of stress

    Tom Cox

  • Exposure to occupational violence and the buffering effects of intra-organizational support.

    Phil Leather;Claire Lawrence;Di Beale;Tom Cox

  • Calculating the cost of work-related stress and psychosocial risks

    J. Hassard;Kevin Teoh;Tom Cox;M. Cosmar

  • Integrated motor drives: state of the art and future trends

    Robert Abebe;Gaurang Vakil;Giovanni Lo Calzo;Thomas Cox

  • Psychosocial factors predicting employee sickness absence during economic decline.

    Unknown

  • The measurement of self-reported stress and arousal.

    Tom Cox;Colin Mackay

  • Downsizing, changes in work, and self-rated health of employees: A 7-year 3-wave panel study

    Mika Kivimäki;Jussi Vahtera;Jaana Pentti;Louise Thomson

  • Evaluating organizational stress-management interventions using adapted study designs

    Raymond Randall;Amanda Griffiths;Tom Cox

  • Measurement of the subjective work environment

    Tom Cox;Eamonn Ferguson

  • Stress, coping and problem solving

    Tom Cox

  • Participants' accounts of a stress management intervention

    Raymond Randall;Tom Cox;Amanda Griffiths

  • Work-related stress in nursing : controlling the risk to health

    Tom. Cox;Amanda. Griffiths;Sue. Cox

  • The nature and assessment of general well-being

    Tom Cox;Michele Thirlaway;Gordon Gotts;Sue Cox

  • A Risk Management Approach to the Prevention of Work Stress

    Tom Cox;Amanda Griffths;Raymond Randall

  • Job strain, effort-reward imbalance, and heavy drinking: a study in 40,851 employees.

    Anne Kouvonen;Mika Kivimäki;Sara J Cox;Kari Poikolainen

  • Work-related violence : assessment and intervention

    Phil Leather;Carol Brady;Claire Lawrence;Diane Beale

  • Work, employment and mental health in Europe

    Tom Cox;Stavroula Leka;Ivan Ivanov;Evelyn Kortum

  • Organizational health, culture and helping

    Tom Cox;Ian Howarth

  • The health of health care organizations

    Tom Cox;Michael Leiter

  • Work-place social capital and smoking cessation: The Finnish Public Sector Study

    Anne Kouvonen;Tuula Oksanen;Jussi Vahtera;Ari Väänänen

  • The Experience and Effects of Stress in Teachers

    Tom Cox;Terence Brockley

Frequent Co-Authors

Jussi Vahtera
Jussi Vahtera Turku University Hospital
Mika Kivimäki
Mika Kivimäki University College London
Eamonn Ferguson
Eamonn Ferguson University of Nottingham
Claire Lawrence
Claire Lawrence University of Nottingham
Michael P. Leiter
Michael P. Leiter Deakin University
Jean-Paul Chavas
Jean-Paul Chavas University of Wisconsin–Madison
Marko Elovainio
Marko Elovainio University of Helsinki
Toon W. Taris
Toon W. Taris Utrecht University
David D. Clarke
David D. Clarke University of Nottingham
Chris Gerada
Chris Gerada University of Nottingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Social Sciences and Humanities offers a wide range of online study options that lead to rewarding careers. Many students are now choosing flexible online programs to balance work, life, and education. It's important to select the right degree pathway that matches your career goals and interests.

If you are interested in clinical or counseling roles, consider exploring the psyd programs for advanced practitioner training in psychology. For those aiming to work with families and couples, the online mft programs provide a specialized route to becoming a licensed Marriage and Family Therapist.

Affordability is a key concern for many students. You can find high-quality, affordable online psychology masters programs, making it easier to achieve your educational goals without taking on excessive debt.

For those looking to move quickly into leadership or academic roles, the shortest online edd programs offer accelerated pathways to an advanced doctorate in education.

With so many flexible online degrees now available, it’s possible to find a pathway that fits your timeline, budget, and career ambitions in the Social Sciences and Humanities fields.

Best Scientists Citing Tom Cox

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles