World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
55
Citations
14268
World Ranking
4355
National Ranking
470

Tom Cox publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tom Cox sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 213 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Tom Cox D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tom Cox sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tom Cox is affiliated with Birkbeck, University of London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans fields primarily in Engineering and Health Professions, with a significant focus on subfields including General Health Professions, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Building and Construction, Environmental Engineering, and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics.

The main topics covered by Cox's work include:

  • Healthcare professionals' stress and burnout
  • Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Gyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research
  • Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
  • Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Building Energy and Comfort Optimization

Several recent papers demonstrate the breadth of Cox's expertise across these fields:

  • "Doctors' working conditions, wellbeing and hospital quality of care: A multilevel analysis" (2020, Safety Science)
  • "Dexmedetomidine- or Clonidine-Based Sedation Compared With Propofol in Critically Ill Patients" (2025, JAMA)
  • "Field testing of the QUB method for assessing the thermal performance of dwellings: In situ measurements of the heat transfer coefficient of a circa 1950s detached house in UK" (2020, Energy and Buildings)
  • "Work-related factors in the etiology of symptoms of post-traumatic stress among first responders: the Brazilian Firefighters Longitudinal Health Study (FLoHS)" (2021, Cadernos de Saúde Pública)
  • "Returning to clinical work and doctors' personal, social and organisational needs: a systematic review" (2022, BMJ Open)

Cox frequently collaborates with coauthors including Timothy Walsh, Kevin Teoh, David Hope, Nazir Lone, and John Norrie. The most common publication venues for Cox include:

  • Energy and Buildings
  • JAMA
  • Safety Science
  • BMJ Open
  • Cadernos de Saúde Pública

The interdisciplinary nature of Cox's work is reflected in the combination of health-related research on healthcare professionals and workplace well-being with engineering-focused studies on building energy and electronic research.

Best Publications

  • Research on work-related stress

    Tom Cox

  • Exploratory Factor Analysis: A Users’Guide

    Eamonn Ferguson;Tom Cox

  • The structure of employee attitudes to safety: A European example

    Sue Cox;Tom Cox

  • An inventory for the measurement of self‐reported stress and arousal

    Colin Mackay;Tom Cox;Grenville Burrows;Tony Lazzerini

  • The cost of work-related stress to society: a systematic review

    Juliet Hassard;Kevin R. H. Teoh;Gintare Visockaite;Philip Dewe

  • Individual differences, stress and coping.

    Tom Cox;Eamonn Ferguson

  • Burnout, Health, Work Stress, and Organizational Healthiness

    Tom Cox;George Kuk;Michael P. Leiter

  • Psychosocial factors predicting employee sickness absence during economic decline

    M Kivimäki;J Vahtera;L Thomson;A Griffiths

  • Relationship between work stress and body mass index among 45,810 female and male employees

    Anne Kouvonen;Mika Kivimäki;Sara J Cox;Tom Cox

  • The Appraisal of Life Events (ALE) scale: Reliability and validity

    Eamonn Ferguson;Gerald Matthews;Tom Cox

  • Individual strategies for coping with stress at work: A review

    Philip Dewe;Tom Cox;Eamonn Ferguson

  • The nature and measurement of work-related stress: theory and practice

    Tom Cox;A. Griffiths

  • The future of organizational interventions: addressing the challenges of today's organizations

    Karina Nielsen;Toon W. Taris;Tom Cox

  • Psychosocial factors and psychophysiological mechanisms in the aetiology and development of cancers

    Tom Cox;Colin Mackay

  • Evaluating organizational-level work stress interventions: Beyond traditional methods

    Tom Cox;Maria Karanika;Amanda Griffiths;Jonathan Houdmont

  • The nature and measurement of stress

    Tom Cox

  • Exposure to occupational violence and the buffering effects of intra-organizational support.

    Phil Leather;Claire Lawrence;Di Beale;Tom Cox

  • Calculating the cost of work-related stress and psychosocial risks

    J. Hassard;Kevin Teoh;Tom Cox;M. Cosmar

  • The European Framework for Psychosocial Risk Management: PRIMA-EF

    S. Leka;Tom Cox

  • Integrated motor drives: state of the art and future trends

    Robert Abebe;Gaurang Vakil;Giovanni Lo Calzo;Thomas Cox

  • The development of the European framework for psychosocial risk management: PRIMA-EF.

    Stavroula Leka;Aditya Jain;Tom Cox;Evelyn Kortum

Frequent Co-Authors

Mika Kivimäki
Mika Kivimäki University College London
Jussi Vahtera
Jussi Vahtera Turku University Hospital
Eamonn Ferguson
Eamonn Ferguson University of Nottingham
Tarja Heponiemi
Tarja Heponiemi Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare
Mai Stafford
Mai Stafford University College London
Ari Väänänen
Ari Väänänen Finnish Institute of Occupational Health
Toon W. Taris
Toon W. Taris Utrecht University
Karina Nielsen
Karina Nielsen University of Sheffield
Fehmidah Munir
Fehmidah Munir Loughborough University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens up a variety of online learning opportunities, especially for those interested in becoming mental health professionals. Online psychology programs provide foundational knowledge and flexible study options for students balancing work or family commitments.

For aspiring mental health counselors, understanding certification requirements is crucial, as they can differ by location. Those seeking to practice as counselors in different cities should familiarize themselves with the specific regulations. For example, individuals can find detailed guidance on Mesa mental health counselor certification requirements and the steps needed to practice in Arizona.

Similarly, potential counselors in Florida should review the Miami mental health counselor certification requirements. For those looking toward the Midwest, be sure to check out the mental health counselor requirements in Milwaukee and the Minneapolis mental health counselor certification requirements.

By completing an accredited online psychology degree and meeting state-specific certification standards, graduates can pursue rewarding careers in counseling and mental health support across the country.

Best Scientists Citing Tom Cox

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles