World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
39
Citations
4661
World Ranking
6467
National Ranking
2187

Stewart W. Breck publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stewart W. Breck sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 108 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Stewart W. Breck D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stewart W. Breck sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stewart W. Breck is affiliated with the United States Department of Agriculture in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with a significant emphasis on wildlife ecology and conservation.

The main fields of study in which Breck publishes include Environmental Science, particularly in subfields such as Ecology, Genetics, Small Animals, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Geography, Planning and Development. Their work covers a range of topics, notably wildlife ecology and conservation, human-animal interaction studies, animal behavior and welfare studies, ecology and biodiversity studies, zoonotic diseases and public health, geographies of human-animal interactions, and species distribution and climate change.

Frequent publication venues for Breck's work include Ecosphere, Journal of Applied Ecology, PeerJ, Global Ecology and Conservation, and Animal Conservation.

Their recent papers illustrate the scope of their research interests:

  • "The evolutionary consequences of human-wildlife conflict in cities" (2020) published in Evolutionary Applications
  • "Individual and population fitness consequences associated with large carnivore use of residential development" (2020) published in Ecosphere
  • "A systematic map of human-carnivore coexistence" (2022) published in Biological Conservation
  • "Public perspectives and media reporting of wolf reintroduction in Colorado" (2020) published in PeerJ
  • "Movement, space-use and resource preferences of European golden jackals in human-dominated landscapes: insights from a telemetry study" (2021) published in Mammalian Biology

Stewart W. Breck collaborates frequently with several researchers, among the most common are:

  • Kevin R. Crooks
  • Julie K. Young
  • Dana L. Hoag
  • Rebecca M. Niemiec
  • Tara L. Teel

Best Publications

  • Wolf Depredation Trends and the Use of Fladry Barriers to Protect Livestock in Western North America

    Marco Musiani;Charles Mamo;Luigi Boitani;Carolyn Callaghan

  • The Carrot or the Stick? Evaluation of Education and Enforcement as Management Tools for Human-Wildlife Conflicts

    Sharon Baruch-Mordo;Stewart W. Breck;Kenneth R. Wilson;John Broderick

  • The intrepid urban coyote: a comparison of bold and exploratory behavior in coyotes from urban and rural environments.

    Stewart W. Breck;Sharon A. Poessel;Peter Mahoney;Peter Mahoney;Julie K. Young;Julie K. Young

  • Stochasticity in natural forage production affects use of urban areas by black bears: implications to management of human-bear conflicts.

    Sharon Baruch-Mordo;Kenneth R. Wilson;David L. Lewis;John Broderick

  • A conceptual model for the integration of social and ecological information to understand human-wildlife interactions

    Stacy A. Lischka;Stacy A. Lischka;Tara L. Teel;Heather E. Johnson;Sarah E. Reed;Sarah E. Reed

  • The evolutionary consequences of human–wildlife conflict in cities

    Christopher J Schell;Lauren A Stanton;Julie K Young;Lisa M Angeloni

  • Spatiotemporal Distribution of Black Bear‐Human Conflicts in Colorado, USA

    Sharon Baruch‐Mordo;Stewart W. Breck;Kenneth R. Wilson;David M. Theobald

  • Adaptive use of nonlethal strategies for minimizing wolf–sheep conflict in Idaho

    Suzanne A. Stone;Stewart W. Breck;Jesse Timberlake;Peter M. Haswell

  • A Tool Box Half Full: How Social Science can Help Solve Human-Wildlife Conflict

    Sharon Baruch-Mordo;Stewart W. Breck;Kenneth R. Wilson;John Broderick

  • Patterns of human–coyote conflicts in the Denver Metropolitan Area†

    Sharon A. Poessel;Stewart W. Breck;Tara L. Teel;Stephanie A. Shwiff

  • Evaluation of Fecal DNA Preservation Techniques and Effects of Sample Age and Diet on Genotyping Success

    Michael Panasci;Warren B. Ballard;Stewart Breck;David Rodriguez

  • Shifting perceptions of risk and reward: Dynamic selection for human development by black bears in the western United States

    H.E. Johnson;S.W. Breck;S. Baruch-Mordo;D.L. Lewis

  • Foraging ecology of black bears in urban environments: guidance for human‐bear conflict mitigation

    D. L. Lewis;S. Baruch-Mordo;K. R. Wilson;S. W. Breck

  • No single solution: application of behavioural principles in mitigating human–wildlife conflict

    Bradley F. Blackwell;Travis L. DeVault;Esteban Fernández-Juricic;Eric M. Gese

  • Differences in food hoarding among six species of heteromyid rodents

    Stephen H. Jenkins;Stewart W. Breck

  • Using Genetic Relatedness to Investigate the Development of Conflict Behavior in Black Bears

    S. W. Breck;C. L. Williams;J. P. Beckmann;S. M. Matthews

  • Compounding effects of human development and a natural food shortage on a black bear population along a human development-wildland interface

    Jared S. Laufenberg;Heather E. Johnson;Paul F. Doherty;Stewart W. Breck

  • Biological, technical, and social aspects of applying electrified fladry for livestock protection from wolves (Canis lupus).

    N. J. Lance;N. J. Lance;S. W. Breck;C. Sime;P. Callahan

  • Human development and climate affect hibernation in a large carnivore with implications for human–carnivore conflicts

    Heather E. Johnson;David L. Lewis;Tana L. Verzuh;Cody F. Wallace

  • Modeling connectivity of black bears in a desert sky island archipelago

    Todd C. Atwood;Todd C. Atwood;Julie K. Young;Julie K. Young;Jon P. Beckmann;Stewart W. Breck

  • Vigilance in Cattle: The Influence of Predation, Social Interactions, and Environmental Factors

    Bryan M. Kluever;Stewart W. Breck;Larry D. Howery;Paul R. Krausman

Frequent Co-Authors

Warren B. Ballard
Warren B. Ballard Texas Tech University
Kevin R. Crooks
Kevin R. Crooks Colorado State University
Tara L. Teel
Tara L. Teel Colorado State University
Dean E. Biggins
Dean E. Biggins United States Geological Survey
Eric M. Gese
Eric M. Gese United States Department of Agriculture
Robert J. Baker
Robert J. Baker Texas Tech University
Francesca Cagnacci
Francesca Cagnacci Fondazione Edmund Mach
Gina M. Ylitalo
Gina M. Ylitalo National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Richard Cronn
Richard Cronn US Forest Service
Elisabetta Visalberghi
Elisabetta Visalberghi National Research Council (CNR)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in expanding your expertise beyond Ecology and Evolution, several related online degrees offer diverse skills and career opportunities. Students with a passion for the environment may find that the online college for military provides flexible, accessible learning—especially if you have military commitments or need adaptable study options.

For those more interested in human and social systems, there are specialized choices. Social and environmental advocacy often intersect, and earning a degree from msw online programs can prepare graduates to work in areas like community outreach and ecological justice.

Deepening your understanding of behavior and cognition is also valuable in environmental education or research. An online masters in psychology provides insights into human and animal behavior, supporting work in conservation or sustainability initiatives.

Finally, ecological change can impact mental health and well-being. A master of mental health online equips students to address these emerging challenges, combining ecological awareness with counseling skills. Exploring these related pathways can help you find a career focus that combines your scientific interests with broader social impact.

Best Scientists Citing Stewart W. Breck

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles