What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Gene
- Internal medicine
- Enzyme
Mark C. Fishman mostly deals with Cell biology, Zebrafish, Anatomy, Nitric oxide synthase and Genetics.
His Growth cone study in the realm of Cell biology interacts with subjects such as HEY2.
His work deals with themes such as Phenotype, Endocardium, Aorta, Neuroscience and Cell fate determination, which intersect with Zebrafish.
Mark C. Fishman combines subjects such as Atrium, Dorsal aorta, Notochord, Mesoderm and Spinal cord with his study of Anatomy.
Endocrinology, Internal medicine and Nitric oxide are closely tied to his Nitric oxide synthase research.
The Sarcomere research Mark C. Fishman does as part of his general Endocrinology study is frequently linked to other disciplines of science, such as Troponin T, therefore creating a link between diverse domains of science.
His most cited work include:
- Conservation of the sequence and temporal expression of let-7 heterochronic regulatory RNA (2008 citations)
- Hypertension in mice lacking the gene for endothelial nitric oxide synthase (1846 citations)
- Effects of cerebral ischemia in mice deficient in neuronal nitric oxide synthase (1463 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Zebrafish, Cell biology, Internal medicine, Endocrinology and Genetics.
His Zebrafish study incorporates themes from Positional cloning, Mutant, Genetic screen, Embryo and Anatomy.
His Cell biology research incorporates themes from Neuron and Heart development.
His Internal medicine research integrates issues from Cell culture and Gene expression.
Endocrinology is closely attributed to Knockout mouse in his study.
He interconnects Ischemia and Vasodilation in the investigation of issues within Nitric oxide synthase.
He most often published in these fields:
- Zebrafish (36.02%)
- Cell biology (33.05%)
- Internal medicine (22.03%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2006-2021)?
- Zebrafish (36.02%)
- Cell biology (33.05%)
- Molecular biology (11.02%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Mark C. Fishman focuses on Zebrafish, Cell biology, Molecular biology, Cancer research and DKK1.
Zebrafish is a subfield of Genetics that Mark C. Fishman investigates.
The various areas that Mark C. Fishman examines in his Cell biology study include Positional cloning, Mutant and Tyrosine.
His Molecular biology research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Enhancer, RNA splicing, snRNP and SMN1.
His DKK1 study combines topics in areas such as Cell, Antibody and Protein target.
In his study, Endocrinology is inextricably linked to Ventricle, which falls within the broad field of Skeletal muscle.
Between 2006 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- SMN2 splice modulators enhance U1-pre-mRNA association and rescue SMA mice (204 citations)
- Selective and Specific Inhibition of the Plasmodium falciparum Lysyl-tRNA Synthetase by the Fungal Secondary Metabolite Cladosporin (147 citations)
- High-resolution chemical dissection of a model eukaryote reveals targets, pathways and gene functions. (112 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Gene
- Enzyme
- Internal medicine
Zebrafish, Molecular biology, Genetics, Gene and Positional cloning are his primary areas of study.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including High-Throughput Screening Assays and Bioinformatics.
When carried out as part of a general Gene research project, his work on Precursor mRNA, SMN1, splice and RNA splicing is frequently linked to work in SMA*, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of study.
His Positional cloning study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Cell biology, Myosin and Sarcomerogenesis.
His Cell biology study frequently intersects with other fields, such as Ectopic expression.
His research on Sarcomerogenesis is centered around Endocrinology and Internal medicine.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
